银行流动性与银行绩效:寻找非线性关系

Eldar Sedaghat Parast, Siavash Golzarian pour, Vahid Hajizadeh
{"title":"银行流动性与银行绩效:寻找非线性关系","authors":"Eldar Sedaghat Parast, Siavash Golzarian pour, Vahid Hajizadeh","doi":"10.52547/jme.16.4.417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Liquid assets are critical for banking operations. They guarantee avoiding liquidity risk and widens managerial decision options to invest in emerging profitable projects; however, holding extra liquidity entails opportunity costs. Accordingly, empirical literature does not provide a conclusive relationship between liquidity and profitability. The purpose of this research is to analyze the asymmetric effects of holding liquid assets by commercial banks on their profitability. Parallel to a detailed review of contradicting theories and empirical evidence, we have developed an econometric model to capture the nonlinear effects of liquidity on performance. The proposed model is tested for a sample of seven listed Iranian commercial banks during 2006-2018 by Arellano-Bond dynamic panel-data estimation. We found that the nonlinear relationship, if any, is not an inverse U as Bordeleau and Graham (2010) suggested. Results show a positive (holding more liquid assets increases the profitability of Iranian banks), and even an accelerating effect for liquidity, likely due to the low level of liquid assets maintained by Iranian banks. implementation of Basel III. They gathered twenty years of data for more than 6000 banks before 2000 and for more than 5000 banks between 2000 to 2012. The results show that banks react to regime change, and their behavior does not match the pre-regulation","PeriodicalId":151574,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Money and Economy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bank Liquidity and Bank Performance: Looking for a Nonlinear Nexus\",\"authors\":\"Eldar Sedaghat Parast, Siavash Golzarian pour, Vahid Hajizadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.52547/jme.16.4.417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Liquid assets are critical for banking operations. They guarantee avoiding liquidity risk and widens managerial decision options to invest in emerging profitable projects; however, holding extra liquidity entails opportunity costs. Accordingly, empirical literature does not provide a conclusive relationship between liquidity and profitability. The purpose of this research is to analyze the asymmetric effects of holding liquid assets by commercial banks on their profitability. Parallel to a detailed review of contradicting theories and empirical evidence, we have developed an econometric model to capture the nonlinear effects of liquidity on performance. The proposed model is tested for a sample of seven listed Iranian commercial banks during 2006-2018 by Arellano-Bond dynamic panel-data estimation. We found that the nonlinear relationship, if any, is not an inverse U as Bordeleau and Graham (2010) suggested. Results show a positive (holding more liquid assets increases the profitability of Iranian banks), and even an accelerating effect for liquidity, likely due to the low level of liquid assets maintained by Iranian banks. implementation of Basel III. They gathered twenty years of data for more than 6000 banks before 2000 and for more than 5000 banks between 2000 to 2012. The results show that banks react to regime change, and their behavior does not match the pre-regulation\",\"PeriodicalId\":151574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Money and Economy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Money and Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52547/jme.16.4.417\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Money and Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/jme.16.4.417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

流动资产对银行业务至关重要。它们保证避免流动性风险,并扩大管理决策选择,投资于新兴的盈利项目;然而,持有额外的流动性需要付出机会成本。因此,实证文献并没有提供流动性和盈利能力之间的结论性关系。本研究的目的是分析商业银行持有流动资产对其盈利能力的不对称影响。在详细回顾相互矛盾的理论和经验证据的同时,我们开发了一个计量经济学模型来捕捉流动性对绩效的非线性影响。通过Arellano-Bond动态面板数据估计,对2006-2018年期间七家伊朗上市商业银行的样本进行了模型测试。我们发现,如果存在非线性关系,也不是Bordeleau和Graham(2010)提出的逆U型关系。结果显示出积极的(持有更多的流动资产增加了伊朗银行的盈利能力),甚至是对流动性的加速效应,这可能是由于伊朗银行保持的低水平流动资产。实施巴塞尔协议III。他们收集了2000年之前6000多家银行20年的数据,以及2000年至2012年5000多家银行的数据。结果表明,银行会对制度变化做出反应,其行为与监管前不匹配
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bank Liquidity and Bank Performance: Looking for a Nonlinear Nexus
Liquid assets are critical for banking operations. They guarantee avoiding liquidity risk and widens managerial decision options to invest in emerging profitable projects; however, holding extra liquidity entails opportunity costs. Accordingly, empirical literature does not provide a conclusive relationship between liquidity and profitability. The purpose of this research is to analyze the asymmetric effects of holding liquid assets by commercial banks on their profitability. Parallel to a detailed review of contradicting theories and empirical evidence, we have developed an econometric model to capture the nonlinear effects of liquidity on performance. The proposed model is tested for a sample of seven listed Iranian commercial banks during 2006-2018 by Arellano-Bond dynamic panel-data estimation. We found that the nonlinear relationship, if any, is not an inverse U as Bordeleau and Graham (2010) suggested. Results show a positive (holding more liquid assets increases the profitability of Iranian banks), and even an accelerating effect for liquidity, likely due to the low level of liquid assets maintained by Iranian banks. implementation of Basel III. They gathered twenty years of data for more than 6000 banks before 2000 and for more than 5000 banks between 2000 to 2012. The results show that banks react to regime change, and their behavior does not match the pre-regulation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信