国家生物燃料生产和使用计划中的竞争力和社会包容:巴西南部地区有关豆油的尖锐机构解决方案中盈利意识的负面反馈

A. L. M. S. Zopelari, A. da Silva César
{"title":"国家生物燃料生产和使用计划中的竞争力和社会包容:巴西南部地区有关豆油的尖锐机构解决方案中盈利意识的负面反馈","authors":"A. L. M. S. Zopelari, A. da Silva César","doi":"10.1109/BWSS.2012.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper intends to make some inferences about the relation of competiveness and social inclusion, and interpret in an operational manner the success of South Region soybean familiar growers ascribed to the National Programme for Biofuels Production and Use. It inquires the hypothesis of sharp institutional arrangements acting as an interface in the social system through whose structure the interrelation between competitiveness and social inclusion might take place. The methodology include collected data, statistical treatment of series and modelling the system. The theoretical framework stemmed from Ulrich Beck's Risk Society, Garret Hardin's Tragedy of the Commons and Eli nor Ostrom's Governing the Commons to Cesar's three-dimension analyses of governance towards competitiveness. The assessments confirmed that Insitutional Settlements are suitable to preclude Risks, but it needs finer operationalization. The model helped to enlight that the most sensitive variable is profitability and if there are severe perturbations, then the negative feedbacks will trigger social vulnerability.","PeriodicalId":432252,"journal":{"name":"2012 Third Brazilian Workshop on Social Simulation","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competitiveness and Social Inclusion within National Programme for Production and Use of Biofuels: Negative Feedbacks on Profitability Awareness in Sharp Institutional Settlements in Brazil South Region Concerning Soybean Oil\",\"authors\":\"A. L. M. S. Zopelari, A. da Silva César\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BWSS.2012.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper intends to make some inferences about the relation of competiveness and social inclusion, and interpret in an operational manner the success of South Region soybean familiar growers ascribed to the National Programme for Biofuels Production and Use. It inquires the hypothesis of sharp institutional arrangements acting as an interface in the social system through whose structure the interrelation between competitiveness and social inclusion might take place. The methodology include collected data, statistical treatment of series and modelling the system. The theoretical framework stemmed from Ulrich Beck's Risk Society, Garret Hardin's Tragedy of the Commons and Eli nor Ostrom's Governing the Commons to Cesar's three-dimension analyses of governance towards competitiveness. The assessments confirmed that Insitutional Settlements are suitable to preclude Risks, but it needs finer operationalization. The model helped to enlight that the most sensitive variable is profitability and if there are severe perturbations, then the negative feedbacks will trigger social vulnerability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 Third Brazilian Workshop on Social Simulation\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 Third Brazilian Workshop on Social Simulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BWSS.2012.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Third Brazilian Workshop on Social Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BWSS.2012.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在对竞争力与社会包容的关系做出一些推论,并以一种可操作的方式解释南方地区大豆熟悉种植者归因于国家生物燃料生产和使用计划的成功。它探讨了尖锐的制度安排作为社会系统中的接口的假设,通过其结构,竞争力和社会包容之间的相互关系可能发生。方法包括收集数据、序列统计处理和系统建模。理论框架源于乌尔里希·贝克的《风险社会》、加勒特·哈丁的《公地悲剧》和伊莱·诺·奥斯特罗姆的《治理公地》,以及塞萨尔对竞争力治理的三维分析。评估证实,机构结算适合于排除风险,但需要更精细的操作。该模型有助于揭示最敏感的变量是盈利能力,如果存在严重的扰动,那么负反馈将引发社会脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Competitiveness and Social Inclusion within National Programme for Production and Use of Biofuels: Negative Feedbacks on Profitability Awareness in Sharp Institutional Settlements in Brazil South Region Concerning Soybean Oil
This paper intends to make some inferences about the relation of competiveness and social inclusion, and interpret in an operational manner the success of South Region soybean familiar growers ascribed to the National Programme for Biofuels Production and Use. It inquires the hypothesis of sharp institutional arrangements acting as an interface in the social system through whose structure the interrelation between competitiveness and social inclusion might take place. The methodology include collected data, statistical treatment of series and modelling the system. The theoretical framework stemmed from Ulrich Beck's Risk Society, Garret Hardin's Tragedy of the Commons and Eli nor Ostrom's Governing the Commons to Cesar's three-dimension analyses of governance towards competitiveness. The assessments confirmed that Insitutional Settlements are suitable to preclude Risks, but it needs finer operationalization. The model helped to enlight that the most sensitive variable is profitability and if there are severe perturbations, then the negative feedbacks will trigger social vulnerability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信