Possibilities of a portable electrocardiogram and pulse wave recorder in detecting left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Highlights. The article presents a novel and unique method for assessment of left ventricular systolic disfunction using electrocardiography and photoplethysmography data. This method will improve and simplify the detection of cardiovascular diseases.Aim. To evaluate left ventricular (LV) systolic function using electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals recorded by a single-channel ECG and PPG-based monitor.Methods. The prospective study included 489 patients over 18 years old with various cardiovascular diseases. All participants underwent echocardiography to determine the main indicators of LV systolic function: LV ejection fraction (EF), LV outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT VTI), and global longitudinal strain (GLS). Moreover, all patients underwent 1-lead ECG and PPG recording using a single-channel ECG and PPG-based monitor (CardioQvark). The obtained data were analyzed, and ROC curve analysis was performed.Results. We have identified ECG and PPG parameters associated with a decrease in LV contractile function. During the analysis, the ECG, T-wave amplitude (TA) and RonsF parameters showed the highest diagnostic accuracy. With EF below 55%, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.822, sensitivity (Se) 80%, specificity (Sp) 69% in EF below 55% in TA; in RonsF AUC was 0.743, Se 81%, Sp 77%. With EF below 40%, AUC was 0.915, Se 85%, Sp 83% in TA, and in RonsF AUC was 0.844, Se 82%, Sp 82%. Diagnostic accuracy of ECG signals in case of LVOT VTI lower than 16 cm was measured: TA (AUC 0.755, Se 82%, Sp 70%), RonsF (AUC 0.620, Se 77%, Sp 72%). PPG signals were not significantly associated with reduced EF; however, the pulse wave parameters were associated with lower LVOT VTI: in DP-B0 AUC was 0.687, Se 71%, Sp 74%. The combination of ECG and PPG signals was significantly associated with EF below 40% (RonsF * DP-SEP (AUC 0.877, Se 86%, Sp 85%). ECG and PPG signals were not associated with LV GLS.Conclusion. Assessment of LV systolic function can be performed by analyzing ECG and PPG signals recorded using a portable single-channel CardioQvark monitor.