墨菲定律:体育博彩合法化如何产生国际影响

Baxter Geddie
{"title":"墨菲定律:体育博彩合法化如何产生国际影响","authors":"Baxter Geddie","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3331148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article discusses a history of gambling laws around the world and highlights the growth of the industry, particularly in regard to sports gambling. It goes on to address Antigua and Barbuda's World Trade Organization complaint against the United States for violating its commitments to the provision of gambling services. Since that dispute, the Supreme Court ruled in Murphy v. NCAA that Congress could not prohibit states from legalizing sports gambling. In the wake of Murphy v. NCAA, more countries will want to attract United States gamblers, and likewise, foreign gamblers will desire to enter the American gambling market. However, while sports gambling is now legal in many states, antiquated federal laws continue to prohibit the cross-border supply of gambling services. This Article shows that many countries have exemplified how regulation is more effective than prohibition, and it argues that the United States should remove remaining prohibitive laws and that the World Trade Organization should increase its role in gambling regulation to promote international uniformity and allow the gambling industry to achieve its full economic potential.","PeriodicalId":378416,"journal":{"name":"International Economic Law eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Murphy's Law: How Sports Gambling Legalization Can Have an International Impact\",\"authors\":\"Baxter Geddie\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3331148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Article discusses a history of gambling laws around the world and highlights the growth of the industry, particularly in regard to sports gambling. It goes on to address Antigua and Barbuda's World Trade Organization complaint against the United States for violating its commitments to the provision of gambling services. Since that dispute, the Supreme Court ruled in Murphy v. NCAA that Congress could not prohibit states from legalizing sports gambling. In the wake of Murphy v. NCAA, more countries will want to attract United States gamblers, and likewise, foreign gamblers will desire to enter the American gambling market. However, while sports gambling is now legal in many states, antiquated federal laws continue to prohibit the cross-border supply of gambling services. This Article shows that many countries have exemplified how regulation is more effective than prohibition, and it argues that the United States should remove remaining prohibitive laws and that the World Trade Organization should increase its role in gambling regulation to promote international uniformity and allow the gambling industry to achieve its full economic potential.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Economic Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Economic Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3331148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Economic Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3331148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了世界各地赌博法律的历史,并强调了该行业的增长,特别是在体育赌博方面。它接着讨论了安提瓜和巴布达向世界贸易组织申诉美国违反其提供赌博服务的承诺。自那次争端以来,最高法院在墨菲诉NCAA案中裁定,国会不能禁止各州将体育赌博合法化。在墨菲诉NCAA案之后,更多的国家将希望吸引美国赌徒,同样,外国赌徒将希望进入美国赌博市场。然而,虽然体育赌博现在在许多州是合法的,但过时的联邦法律仍然禁止跨境提供赌博服务。这篇文章表明,许多国家已经证明了监管如何比禁止更有效,它认为美国应该取消剩余的禁止性法律,世界贸易组织应该增加其在赌博监管中的作用,以促进国际统一,并允许博彩业充分发挥其经济潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Murphy's Law: How Sports Gambling Legalization Can Have an International Impact
This Article discusses a history of gambling laws around the world and highlights the growth of the industry, particularly in regard to sports gambling. It goes on to address Antigua and Barbuda's World Trade Organization complaint against the United States for violating its commitments to the provision of gambling services. Since that dispute, the Supreme Court ruled in Murphy v. NCAA that Congress could not prohibit states from legalizing sports gambling. In the wake of Murphy v. NCAA, more countries will want to attract United States gamblers, and likewise, foreign gamblers will desire to enter the American gambling market. However, while sports gambling is now legal in many states, antiquated federal laws continue to prohibit the cross-border supply of gambling services. This Article shows that many countries have exemplified how regulation is more effective than prohibition, and it argues that the United States should remove remaining prohibitive laws and that the World Trade Organization should increase its role in gambling regulation to promote international uniformity and allow the gambling industry to achieve its full economic potential.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信