[多普勒血流动力学评价生物人工瓣膜二尖瓣位置失效]。

Journal of cardiology. Supplement Pub Date : 1991-01-01
T Takamoto, M Nitta, H Ito, F Marumo, T Sakamoto, A Suzuki
{"title":"[多普勒血流动力学评价生物人工瓣膜二尖瓣位置失效]。","authors":"T Takamoto,&nbsp;M Nitta,&nbsp;H Ito,&nbsp;F Marumo,&nbsp;T Sakamoto,&nbsp;A Suzuki","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) allows the accurate assessment of primary tissue degeneration of bioprosthetic valves. The Doppler method permits quantitative evaluation of the pressure gradient across the prosthetic valve or detection of regurgitant flow. The present study summarized our clinical experiences of serial cases of mitral valve replacement (MVR) with bioprostheses at the mitral position, and clarified the clinical usefulness and limitations of Doppler and 2DE examinations for the early detection of primary valve dysfunction. Consecutive 65 patients undergoing single mitral valve replacement from April, 1977 to November, 1979 were listed for the study. A survey of the present clinical status was carried out from July, 1988 to July, 1990 (a follow-up period ranged from 84 to 127 months) for all patients, and the information was available from 53 patients (47 adults and six infants). Twenty-four survived patients without re-MVR were examined by Doppler and 2DE. Among the 53 patients, 34 were alive and 19 dead, and the total survival rate was 64.2%. The reasons for death in 19 patients were perioperative death in seven (including four infants with severe calcification of bioprostheses), chronic heart failure in three, cerebral infarction in two, post blood transfusion hepatitis in two, endocarditis in one, and non-cardiac death such as cancers in four. During the long-term observation of 47 adult patients, 14 cases (30%) had re-MVR (one for a stenotic lesion with massive calcification, and 13 for torn leaflets). Thickening and/or torn leaflets were noted in 13 (54%) of the 24 survived patients without re-MVR.2+ suggests that bioprosthetic valve replacement at the mitral position may not be recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":77193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology. Supplement","volume":"25 ","pages":"149-57; discussion 158-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of bioprosthetic valve failure in the mitral position].\",\"authors\":\"T Takamoto,&nbsp;M Nitta,&nbsp;H Ito,&nbsp;F Marumo,&nbsp;T Sakamoto,&nbsp;A Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) allows the accurate assessment of primary tissue degeneration of bioprosthetic valves. The Doppler method permits quantitative evaluation of the pressure gradient across the prosthetic valve or detection of regurgitant flow. The present study summarized our clinical experiences of serial cases of mitral valve replacement (MVR) with bioprostheses at the mitral position, and clarified the clinical usefulness and limitations of Doppler and 2DE examinations for the early detection of primary valve dysfunction. Consecutive 65 patients undergoing single mitral valve replacement from April, 1977 to November, 1979 were listed for the study. A survey of the present clinical status was carried out from July, 1988 to July, 1990 (a follow-up period ranged from 84 to 127 months) for all patients, and the information was available from 53 patients (47 adults and six infants). Twenty-four survived patients without re-MVR were examined by Doppler and 2DE. Among the 53 patients, 34 were alive and 19 dead, and the total survival rate was 64.2%. The reasons for death in 19 patients were perioperative death in seven (including four infants with severe calcification of bioprostheses), chronic heart failure in three, cerebral infarction in two, post blood transfusion hepatitis in two, endocarditis in one, and non-cardiac death such as cancers in four. During the long-term observation of 47 adult patients, 14 cases (30%) had re-MVR (one for a stenotic lesion with massive calcification, and 13 for torn leaflets). Thickening and/or torn leaflets were noted in 13 (54%) of the 24 survived patients without re-MVR.2+ suggests that bioprosthetic valve replacement at the mitral position may not be recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiology. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"149-57; discussion 158-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiology. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

m模式和二维超声心动图(2DE)可以准确评估生物假体瓣膜的原发性组织变性。多普勒方法可以定量评估假体瓣膜的压力梯度或检测反流。本文总结了我们在二尖瓣位置应用生物假体进行二尖瓣置换术(MVR)的一系列病例的临床经验,并阐明了多普勒和2DE检查对早期发现原发性瓣膜功能障碍的临床价值和局限性。从1977年4月至1979年11月,连续65例接受单二尖瓣置换术的患者被纳入研究。从1988年7月至1990年7月对所有患者进行临床现状调查(随访期84 ~ 127个月),获得53例(成人47例,婴儿6例)资料。24例未发生re-MVR的存活患者行多普勒和2DE检查。53例患者中存活34例,死亡19例,总生存率为64.2%。19例患者的死亡原因为围手术期死亡7例(包括4例伴有生物假体严重钙化的婴儿),慢性心力衰竭3例,脑梗死2例,输血后肝炎2例,心内膜炎1例,非心脏性死亡如癌症4例。在对47例成人患者的长期观察中,有14例(30%)发生了re-MVR(一例狭窄病变伴大量钙化,13例小叶撕裂)。在24例没有re-MVR的存活患者中,有13例(54%)发现小叶增厚和/或撕裂。2+提示在二尖瓣位置不推荐生物人工瓣膜置换术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of bioprosthetic valve failure in the mitral position].

M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) allows the accurate assessment of primary tissue degeneration of bioprosthetic valves. The Doppler method permits quantitative evaluation of the pressure gradient across the prosthetic valve or detection of regurgitant flow. The present study summarized our clinical experiences of serial cases of mitral valve replacement (MVR) with bioprostheses at the mitral position, and clarified the clinical usefulness and limitations of Doppler and 2DE examinations for the early detection of primary valve dysfunction. Consecutive 65 patients undergoing single mitral valve replacement from April, 1977 to November, 1979 were listed for the study. A survey of the present clinical status was carried out from July, 1988 to July, 1990 (a follow-up period ranged from 84 to 127 months) for all patients, and the information was available from 53 patients (47 adults and six infants). Twenty-four survived patients without re-MVR were examined by Doppler and 2DE. Among the 53 patients, 34 were alive and 19 dead, and the total survival rate was 64.2%. The reasons for death in 19 patients were perioperative death in seven (including four infants with severe calcification of bioprostheses), chronic heart failure in three, cerebral infarction in two, post blood transfusion hepatitis in two, endocarditis in one, and non-cardiac death such as cancers in four. During the long-term observation of 47 adult patients, 14 cases (30%) had re-MVR (one for a stenotic lesion with massive calcification, and 13 for torn leaflets). Thickening and/or torn leaflets were noted in 13 (54%) of the 24 survived patients without re-MVR.2+ suggests that bioprosthetic valve replacement at the mitral position may not be recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信