{"title":"假设检验和确证","authors":"J. Sprenger, S. Hartmann","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199672110.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to Popper and other influential philosophers and scientists, scientific knowledge grows by repeatedly testing our best hypotheses. However, the interpretation of non-significant results—those that do not lead to a “rejection” of the tested hypothesis—poses a major philosophical challenge. To what extent do they corroborate the tested hypothesis or provide a reason to accept it? In this chapter, we prove two impossibility results for measures of corroboration that follow Popper’s criterion of measuring both predictive success and the testability of a hypothesis. Then we provide an axiomatic characterization of a more promising and scientifically useful concept of corroboration and discuss implications for the practice of hypothesis testing and the concept of statistical significance.","PeriodicalId":140328,"journal":{"name":"Bayesian Philosophy of Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypothesis Tests and Corroboration\",\"authors\":\"J. Sprenger, S. Hartmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780199672110.003.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to Popper and other influential philosophers and scientists, scientific knowledge grows by repeatedly testing our best hypotheses. However, the interpretation of non-significant results—those that do not lead to a “rejection” of the tested hypothesis—poses a major philosophical challenge. To what extent do they corroborate the tested hypothesis or provide a reason to accept it? In this chapter, we prove two impossibility results for measures of corroboration that follow Popper’s criterion of measuring both predictive success and the testability of a hypothesis. Then we provide an axiomatic characterization of a more promising and scientifically useful concept of corroboration and discuss implications for the practice of hypothesis testing and the concept of statistical significance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":140328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bayesian Philosophy of Science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bayesian Philosophy of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199672110.003.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bayesian Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199672110.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
According to Popper and other influential philosophers and scientists, scientific knowledge grows by repeatedly testing our best hypotheses. However, the interpretation of non-significant results—those that do not lead to a “rejection” of the tested hypothesis—poses a major philosophical challenge. To what extent do they corroborate the tested hypothesis or provide a reason to accept it? In this chapter, we prove two impossibility results for measures of corroboration that follow Popper’s criterion of measuring both predictive success and the testability of a hypothesis. Then we provide an axiomatic characterization of a more promising and scientifically useful concept of corroboration and discuss implications for the practice of hypothesis testing and the concept of statistical significance.