托尼·布莱尔的首相任期是新自由主义吗?《英国经济政策调查》,1979-2007年

N. Elhefnawy
{"title":"托尼·布莱尔的首相任期是新自由主义吗?《英国经济政策调查》,1979-2007年","authors":"N. Elhefnawy","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3676360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of the term \"neoliberal\" has become controversial in recent years, at least in part because of its diversity of possible uses, and the apparent vagueness or looseness of some of those uses. That controversy has significantly extended to the characterization of center-left political parties and their leaders, like the Labour Party's Tony Blair, as neoliberals--a problem exacerbated by a comparative scarcity of summations of the relevant portions of their conduct in office that are at once properly grounded and contextualized, concise and accessible. \n \nAs a contribution to the establishment of a more substantial foundation for debates over neoliberalism in general, and the British policy record of recent decades, this paper endeavors to offer just such a summation, with an eye to answering the question \"Was Tony Blair's Prime Ministership neoliberal?\" To that end it endeavors to provide a comprehensive, rigorous definition of neoliberalism taking into account the term's at once referring to multiple, interrelated phenomena, in particular a body of ideology, style of policymaking and economic model. This general discussion of neoliberalism, moreover, is bolstered by a a detailed examination of the stated intentions and actual policies of the Margaret Thatcher prime ministership that is perhaps more widely and firmly identified with the \"neoliberal turn\" than any other. In considering Thatcher's record, the paper also fills in crucial historical context and provides a still more fully developed basis for assessing Blair prime ministership in light of the definition provided, and the precedent and context created by preceding Conservative governments. \n \n \nUltimately this paper concludes that Blair's conduct as party leader and prime minister do in fact safely warrant characterization as neoliberal, and indeed as a significant consolidation and extension of the policy thrust from Margaret Thatcher forward. This paper also concludes that this has arguably been obscured by, besides the inadequacies of much of the available literature already mentioned, the extent to which his neoliberalism consisted of acquiescence in and extension of the initiatives of preceding Conservative governments more than presenting new ones of his own; an overreadiness to see even the most modest apparent deviation from the \"Thatcherite line\" as a break with neoliberalism (for instance, Blair's increased funding of health care, for example, while overlooking his commitment to internal markets, and intensified collaboration with the private sector, which may be said to have furthered the system's characteristically neoliberal privatization); and the degree to which Blair's domestic record has been overshadowed by his foreign policy record, above all his role in the Iraq war.","PeriodicalId":244949,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Was Tony Blair's Prime Ministership Neoliberal?': A Survey of British Economic Policy, 1979-2007\",\"authors\":\"N. Elhefnawy\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3676360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of the term \\\"neoliberal\\\" has become controversial in recent years, at least in part because of its diversity of possible uses, and the apparent vagueness or looseness of some of those uses. That controversy has significantly extended to the characterization of center-left political parties and their leaders, like the Labour Party's Tony Blair, as neoliberals--a problem exacerbated by a comparative scarcity of summations of the relevant portions of their conduct in office that are at once properly grounded and contextualized, concise and accessible. \\n \\nAs a contribution to the establishment of a more substantial foundation for debates over neoliberalism in general, and the British policy record of recent decades, this paper endeavors to offer just such a summation, with an eye to answering the question \\\"Was Tony Blair's Prime Ministership neoliberal?\\\" To that end it endeavors to provide a comprehensive, rigorous definition of neoliberalism taking into account the term's at once referring to multiple, interrelated phenomena, in particular a body of ideology, style of policymaking and economic model. This general discussion of neoliberalism, moreover, is bolstered by a a detailed examination of the stated intentions and actual policies of the Margaret Thatcher prime ministership that is perhaps more widely and firmly identified with the \\\"neoliberal turn\\\" than any other. In considering Thatcher's record, the paper also fills in crucial historical context and provides a still more fully developed basis for assessing Blair prime ministership in light of the definition provided, and the precedent and context created by preceding Conservative governments. \\n \\n \\nUltimately this paper concludes that Blair's conduct as party leader and prime minister do in fact safely warrant characterization as neoliberal, and indeed as a significant consolidation and extension of the policy thrust from Margaret Thatcher forward. This paper also concludes that this has arguably been obscured by, besides the inadequacies of much of the available literature already mentioned, the extent to which his neoliberalism consisted of acquiescence in and extension of the initiatives of preceding Conservative governments more than presenting new ones of his own; an overreadiness to see even the most modest apparent deviation from the \\\"Thatcherite line\\\" as a break with neoliberalism (for instance, Blair's increased funding of health care, for example, while overlooking his commitment to internal markets, and intensified collaboration with the private sector, which may be said to have furthered the system's characteristically neoliberal privatization); and the degree to which Blair's domestic record has been overshadowed by his foreign policy record, above all his role in the Iraq war.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Macroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Macroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3676360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3676360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

近年来,“新自由主义”一词的使用引起了争议,至少部分原因在于它可能的用途的多样性,以及其中一些用途的明显模糊或松散。这一争议已经严重延伸到将中左翼政党及其领导人(如工党的托尼·布莱尔(Tony Blair))定性为新自由主义者的问题上——对这些政党执政期间相关行为的总结相对缺乏,从而加剧了这一问题。这些总结既有适当的依据,又有背景,既简洁又通俗易懂。作为对新自由主义辩论和近几十年英国政策记录建立更实质性基础的贡献,本文试图提供这样一个总结,着眼于回答“托尼·布莱尔的首相任期是新自由主义吗?”为了达到这个目的,它努力提供一个全面、严格的新自由主义定义,同时考虑到这个术语指的是多种相互关联的现象,特别是一套意识形态、决策风格和经济模式。此外,这种关于新自由主义的一般性讨论得到了对玛格丽特•撒切尔(Margaret Thatcher)首相任期内所陈述的意图和实际政策的详细审查的支持,撒切尔可能比其他任何首相任期都更广泛、更坚定地认同于“新自由主义转向”。在考虑撒切尔的政绩时,本文还补充了关键的历史背景,并根据所提供的定义,以及之前保守党政府所创造的先例和背景,为评估布莱尔的首相任期提供了一个更全面的基础。最后,本文的结论是,布莱尔作为政党领袖和首相的行为,实际上可以安全地保证新自由主义者的特征,并且确实是玛格丽特·撒切尔向前推进的政策的重要巩固和延伸。本文还得出结论,除了已经提到的许多现有文献的不足之处之外,他的新自由主义在多大程度上是默许和扩展了前保守党政府的倡议,而不是提出自己的新倡议,这可以说是模糊了这一点;过度倾向于将哪怕是最温和的背离“撒切尔路线”的行为视为与新自由主义的分裂(例如,布莱尔增加了对医疗保健的资助,却忽视了他对内部市场的承诺,并加强了与私营部门的合作,这可以说是进一步推进了该体系特有的新自由主义私有化);以及布莱尔的内政记录在多大程度上被他的外交政策记录所掩盖,尤其是他在伊拉克战争中的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Was Tony Blair's Prime Ministership Neoliberal?': A Survey of British Economic Policy, 1979-2007
The use of the term "neoliberal" has become controversial in recent years, at least in part because of its diversity of possible uses, and the apparent vagueness or looseness of some of those uses. That controversy has significantly extended to the characterization of center-left political parties and their leaders, like the Labour Party's Tony Blair, as neoliberals--a problem exacerbated by a comparative scarcity of summations of the relevant portions of their conduct in office that are at once properly grounded and contextualized, concise and accessible. As a contribution to the establishment of a more substantial foundation for debates over neoliberalism in general, and the British policy record of recent decades, this paper endeavors to offer just such a summation, with an eye to answering the question "Was Tony Blair's Prime Ministership neoliberal?" To that end it endeavors to provide a comprehensive, rigorous definition of neoliberalism taking into account the term's at once referring to multiple, interrelated phenomena, in particular a body of ideology, style of policymaking and economic model. This general discussion of neoliberalism, moreover, is bolstered by a a detailed examination of the stated intentions and actual policies of the Margaret Thatcher prime ministership that is perhaps more widely and firmly identified with the "neoliberal turn" than any other. In considering Thatcher's record, the paper also fills in crucial historical context and provides a still more fully developed basis for assessing Blair prime ministership in light of the definition provided, and the precedent and context created by preceding Conservative governments. Ultimately this paper concludes that Blair's conduct as party leader and prime minister do in fact safely warrant characterization as neoliberal, and indeed as a significant consolidation and extension of the policy thrust from Margaret Thatcher forward. This paper also concludes that this has arguably been obscured by, besides the inadequacies of much of the available literature already mentioned, the extent to which his neoliberalism consisted of acquiescence in and extension of the initiatives of preceding Conservative governments more than presenting new ones of his own; an overreadiness to see even the most modest apparent deviation from the "Thatcherite line" as a break with neoliberalism (for instance, Blair's increased funding of health care, for example, while overlooking his commitment to internal markets, and intensified collaboration with the private sector, which may be said to have furthered the system's characteristically neoliberal privatization); and the degree to which Blair's domestic record has been overshadowed by his foreign policy record, above all his role in the Iraq war.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信