斜交桥面延伸桥的力学性能

Junqing Xue, Shenghong Mao, B. Briseghella, Bao-chun Chen, Jian-bao Miao, Xu Wang
{"title":"斜交桥面延伸桥的力学性能","authors":"Junqing Xue, Shenghong Mao, B. Briseghella, Bao-chun Chen, Jian-bao Miao, Xu Wang","doi":"10.2749/nanjing.2022.1730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The deck-extension bridges is the most widely used jointless bridges in China due to the simple structure and convenient construction. The mechanical performance of skewed bridges is more complex than that of right bridges. To understand the difference between the skewed deck- extension bridge (SDEB) and the skewed jointed bridge (SJB), a SDEB built in China was chosen as a case study. The girders and approach slabs longitudinal displacements were monitored. A finite element model (FEM) was implemented by using the MIDAS-Civil software, of which the accuracy was verified by monitoring results. The mechanical performance of the SDEB and SJB under different load cases was compared. The influence of different skew angles on the mechanical performance of the SDEB was studied. The results indicated that the mid-span bending moment of the SDEB was slightly smaller by 5% than that of the SJB. Compared with the SJB, the mid-span torque of the girder in the side span and axial force at the girder end in the SDEB were significantly larger, which should be paid special attentions to during the design. The in-plane rotation of the girder in the SDEB was limited by the approach slab; therefore, the lateral displacement of the SDEB was significantly smaller than that of the SJB, especially for the skew angle of 30°. Bearing unseating and deck cracks may be improved in SDEB.","PeriodicalId":410450,"journal":{"name":"IABSE Congress, Nanjing 2022: Bridges and Structures: Connection, Integration and Harmonisation","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical performance of skewed deck-extension bridge\",\"authors\":\"Junqing Xue, Shenghong Mao, B. Briseghella, Bao-chun Chen, Jian-bao Miao, Xu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.2749/nanjing.2022.1730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The deck-extension bridges is the most widely used jointless bridges in China due to the simple structure and convenient construction. The mechanical performance of skewed bridges is more complex than that of right bridges. To understand the difference between the skewed deck- extension bridge (SDEB) and the skewed jointed bridge (SJB), a SDEB built in China was chosen as a case study. The girders and approach slabs longitudinal displacements were monitored. A finite element model (FEM) was implemented by using the MIDAS-Civil software, of which the accuracy was verified by monitoring results. The mechanical performance of the SDEB and SJB under different load cases was compared. The influence of different skew angles on the mechanical performance of the SDEB was studied. The results indicated that the mid-span bending moment of the SDEB was slightly smaller by 5% than that of the SJB. Compared with the SJB, the mid-span torque of the girder in the side span and axial force at the girder end in the SDEB were significantly larger, which should be paid special attentions to during the design. The in-plane rotation of the girder in the SDEB was limited by the approach slab; therefore, the lateral displacement of the SDEB was significantly smaller than that of the SJB, especially for the skew angle of 30°. Bearing unseating and deck cracks may be improved in SDEB.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IABSE Congress, Nanjing 2022: Bridges and Structures: Connection, Integration and Harmonisation\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IABSE Congress, Nanjing 2022: Bridges and Structures: Connection, Integration and Harmonisation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2749/nanjing.2022.1730\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IABSE Congress, Nanjing 2022: Bridges and Structures: Connection, Integration and Harmonisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2749/nanjing.2022.1730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

上承式桥梁结构简单,施工方便,是目前国内应用最广泛的一种无接缝桥梁。斜交桥梁的受力性能比斜交桥梁更为复杂。为了解斜交桥面延伸桥(SDEB)与斜交节理桥(SJB)的区别,以国内某斜交桥面延伸桥为例进行了研究。监测了梁和引线板的纵向位移。利用MIDAS-Civil软件建立了有限元模型,通过监测结果验证了有限元模型的准确性。比较了SDEB和SJB在不同荷载工况下的受力性能。研究了不同倾斜角度对SDEB力学性能的影响。结果表明:SDEB的跨中弯矩比SJB略小5%;与SJB结构相比,SDEB结构侧跨中梁的跨中扭矩和梁端轴力明显更大,在设计时应特别注意。在SDEB中,梁的面内转动受到引板的限制;因此,SDEB的侧向位移明显小于SJB,尤其是在倾斜角度为30°时。在SDEB中,轴承脱臼和甲板裂缝可以得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanical performance of skewed deck-extension bridge
The deck-extension bridges is the most widely used jointless bridges in China due to the simple structure and convenient construction. The mechanical performance of skewed bridges is more complex than that of right bridges. To understand the difference between the skewed deck- extension bridge (SDEB) and the skewed jointed bridge (SJB), a SDEB built in China was chosen as a case study. The girders and approach slabs longitudinal displacements were monitored. A finite element model (FEM) was implemented by using the MIDAS-Civil software, of which the accuracy was verified by monitoring results. The mechanical performance of the SDEB and SJB under different load cases was compared. The influence of different skew angles on the mechanical performance of the SDEB was studied. The results indicated that the mid-span bending moment of the SDEB was slightly smaller by 5% than that of the SJB. Compared with the SJB, the mid-span torque of the girder in the side span and axial force at the girder end in the SDEB were significantly larger, which should be paid special attentions to during the design. The in-plane rotation of the girder in the SDEB was limited by the approach slab; therefore, the lateral displacement of the SDEB was significantly smaller than that of the SJB, especially for the skew angle of 30°. Bearing unseating and deck cracks may be improved in SDEB.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信