SAFEXPLAIN:基于AI的安全且可解释的关键嵌入式系统

J. Abella, Jon Pérez, Cristofer Englund, Bahram Zonooz, Gabriele Giordana, Carlo Donzella, F. Cazorla, E. Mezzetti, Isabel Serra, Axel Brando, Irune Agirre, Fernando Eizaguirre, Thanh Hai Bui, E. Arani, F. Sarfraz, Ajay Balasubramaniam, Ahmed Badar, I. Bloise, L. Feruglio, Ilaria Cinelli, Davide Brighenti, Davide Cunial
{"title":"SAFEXPLAIN:基于AI的安全且可解释的关键嵌入式系统","authors":"J. Abella, Jon Pérez, Cristofer Englund, Bahram Zonooz, Gabriele Giordana, Carlo Donzella, F. Cazorla, E. Mezzetti, Isabel Serra, Axel Brando, Irune Agirre, Fernando Eizaguirre, Thanh Hai Bui, E. Arani, F. Sarfraz, Ajay Balasubramaniam, Ahmed Badar, I. Bloise, L. Feruglio, Ilaria Cinelli, Davide Brighenti, Davide Cunial","doi":"10.23919/DATE56975.2023.10137128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deep Learning (DL) techniques are at the heart of most future advanced software functions in Critical Autonomous AI-based Systems (CAIS), where they also represent a major competitive factor. Hence, the economic success of CAIS industries (e.g., automotive, space, railway) depends on their ability to design, implement, qualify, and certify DL-based software products under bounded effort/cost. However, there is a fundamental gap between Functional Safety (FUSA) requirements on CAIS and the nature of DL solutions. This gap stems from the development process of DL libraries and affects high-level safety concepts such as (1) explainability and traceability, (2) suitability for varying safety requirements, (3) FUSA-compliant implementations, and (4) real-time constraints. As a matter of fact, the data-dependent and stochastic nature of DL algorithms clashes with current FUSA practice, which instead builds on deterministic, verifiable, and pass/fail test-based software. The SAFEXPLAIN project tackles these challenges and targets by providing a flexible approach to allow the certification - hence adoption - of DL-based solutions in CAIS building on: (1) DL solutions that provide end-to-end traceability, with specific approaches to explain whether predictions can be trusted and strategies to reach (and prove) correct operation, in accordance to certification standards; (2) alternative and increasingly sophisticated design safety patterns for DL with varying criticality and fault tolerance requirements; (3) DL library implementations that adhere to safety requirements; and (4) computing platform configurations, to regain determinism, and probabilistic timing analyses, to handle the remaining non-determinism.","PeriodicalId":340349,"journal":{"name":"2023 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SAFEXPLAIN: Safe and Explainable Critical Embedded Systems Based on AI\",\"authors\":\"J. Abella, Jon Pérez, Cristofer Englund, Bahram Zonooz, Gabriele Giordana, Carlo Donzella, F. Cazorla, E. Mezzetti, Isabel Serra, Axel Brando, Irune Agirre, Fernando Eizaguirre, Thanh Hai Bui, E. Arani, F. Sarfraz, Ajay Balasubramaniam, Ahmed Badar, I. Bloise, L. Feruglio, Ilaria Cinelli, Davide Brighenti, Davide Cunial\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/DATE56975.2023.10137128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Deep Learning (DL) techniques are at the heart of most future advanced software functions in Critical Autonomous AI-based Systems (CAIS), where they also represent a major competitive factor. Hence, the economic success of CAIS industries (e.g., automotive, space, railway) depends on their ability to design, implement, qualify, and certify DL-based software products under bounded effort/cost. However, there is a fundamental gap between Functional Safety (FUSA) requirements on CAIS and the nature of DL solutions. This gap stems from the development process of DL libraries and affects high-level safety concepts such as (1) explainability and traceability, (2) suitability for varying safety requirements, (3) FUSA-compliant implementations, and (4) real-time constraints. As a matter of fact, the data-dependent and stochastic nature of DL algorithms clashes with current FUSA practice, which instead builds on deterministic, verifiable, and pass/fail test-based software. The SAFEXPLAIN project tackles these challenges and targets by providing a flexible approach to allow the certification - hence adoption - of DL-based solutions in CAIS building on: (1) DL solutions that provide end-to-end traceability, with specific approaches to explain whether predictions can be trusted and strategies to reach (and prove) correct operation, in accordance to certification standards; (2) alternative and increasingly sophisticated design safety patterns for DL with varying criticality and fault tolerance requirements; (3) DL library implementations that adhere to safety requirements; and (4) computing platform configurations, to regain determinism, and probabilistic timing analyses, to handle the remaining non-determinism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/DATE56975.2023.10137128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/DATE56975.2023.10137128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

深度学习(DL)技术是关键自主人工智能系统(CAIS)中大多数未来先进软件功能的核心,也是一个主要的竞争因素。因此,CAIS行业(例如,汽车、航天、铁路)的经济成功取决于它们在有限的努力/成本下设计、实现、鉴定和认证基于dl的软件产品的能力。然而,CAIS的功能安全(FUSA)要求与DL解决方案的本质之间存在根本差距。这种差距源于DL库的开发过程,并影响了高级安全概念,例如(1)可解释性和可追溯性,(2)对不同安全需求的适用性,(3)符合fusa的实现,以及(4)实时约束。事实上,深度学习算法的数据依赖性和随机性与当前的FUSA实践相冲突,后者建立在确定性、可验证和通过/失败测试的软件上。SAFEXPLAIN项目通过提供一种灵活的方法来解决这些挑战和目标,从而允许在CAIS中采用基于DL的解决方案:(1)提供端到端可追溯性的DL解决方案,具有根据认证标准解释预测是否可信的具体方法和达到(并证明)正确操作的策略;(2)具有不同临界性和容错要求的DL的可选和日益复杂的设计安全模式;(3)符合安全要求的DL库实现;(4)计算平台配置,恢复确定性,并进行概率时序分析,处理剩余的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SAFEXPLAIN: Safe and Explainable Critical Embedded Systems Based on AI
Deep Learning (DL) techniques are at the heart of most future advanced software functions in Critical Autonomous AI-based Systems (CAIS), where they also represent a major competitive factor. Hence, the economic success of CAIS industries (e.g., automotive, space, railway) depends on their ability to design, implement, qualify, and certify DL-based software products under bounded effort/cost. However, there is a fundamental gap between Functional Safety (FUSA) requirements on CAIS and the nature of DL solutions. This gap stems from the development process of DL libraries and affects high-level safety concepts such as (1) explainability and traceability, (2) suitability for varying safety requirements, (3) FUSA-compliant implementations, and (4) real-time constraints. As a matter of fact, the data-dependent and stochastic nature of DL algorithms clashes with current FUSA practice, which instead builds on deterministic, verifiable, and pass/fail test-based software. The SAFEXPLAIN project tackles these challenges and targets by providing a flexible approach to allow the certification - hence adoption - of DL-based solutions in CAIS building on: (1) DL solutions that provide end-to-end traceability, with specific approaches to explain whether predictions can be trusted and strategies to reach (and prove) correct operation, in accordance to certification standards; (2) alternative and increasingly sophisticated design safety patterns for DL with varying criticality and fault tolerance requirements; (3) DL library implementations that adhere to safety requirements; and (4) computing platform configurations, to regain determinism, and probabilistic timing analyses, to handle the remaining non-determinism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信