民事诉讼中法官独立原则与辩护独立原则的互动

A. Fedina
{"title":"民事诉讼中法官独立原则与辩护独立原则的互动","authors":"A. Fedina","doi":"10.18287/2542-047x-2022-8-2-70-77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the forms of interaction of the eponymous principle of independence in the professional activities of a pleader and a judge in a civil process. The conditions of independence are necessary for the judge and the pleader to be free in political, economic and intellectual terms for the qualitative implementation of professional activities. The author concludes that the independence of a pleader, as well as the independence of judges, has its own limits in subordination to Constitution of Russian Federation and the law, guarantees of the independence of pleaders and judges are similar in content. Guarantees of the independence of professional activities of judges and pleaders in the Russian Federation are the organizational independence of the judicial system and the bar, the activities of the bodies of judicial and bar community, the ban on interference in their professional activities, as well as the ban on engaging in any activities other than those defined in the law. Mutual respect for judicial and pleader independence makes the procedural activities of the pleader and the court in civil proceedings more effective and rewarding.","PeriodicalId":406056,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Journal of Samara University","volume":"466 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interaction of the principle of independence of judges and the principle of independence of advocacy in civil proceedings\",\"authors\":\"A. Fedina\",\"doi\":\"10.18287/2542-047x-2022-8-2-70-77\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines the forms of interaction of the eponymous principle of independence in the professional activities of a pleader and a judge in a civil process. The conditions of independence are necessary for the judge and the pleader to be free in political, economic and intellectual terms for the qualitative implementation of professional activities. The author concludes that the independence of a pleader, as well as the independence of judges, has its own limits in subordination to Constitution of Russian Federation and the law, guarantees of the independence of pleaders and judges are similar in content. Guarantees of the independence of professional activities of judges and pleaders in the Russian Federation are the organizational independence of the judicial system and the bar, the activities of the bodies of judicial and bar community, the ban on interference in their professional activities, as well as the ban on engaging in any activities other than those defined in the law. Mutual respect for judicial and pleader independence makes the procedural activities of the pleader and the court in civil proceedings more effective and rewarding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Juridical Journal of Samara University\",\"volume\":\"466 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Juridical Journal of Samara University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047x-2022-8-2-70-77\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Journal of Samara University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047x-2022-8-2-70-77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了在民事诉讼中辩护人与法官的专业活动中,独立的同名原则的相互作用形式。独立的条件是法官和辩护人在政治、经济和智力方面自由的必要条件,以便有质量地实施专业活动。作者认为,法官的独立性和法官的独立性在服从俄罗斯联邦宪法和法律方面都有其局限性,法官独立性的保障与法官独立性的保障在内容上是相似的。俄罗斯联邦法官和领导人专业活动独立性的保障是司法系统和律师协会的组织独立性,司法和律师协会机构的活动独立性,禁止干涉其专业活动,以及禁止从事法律规定以外的任何活动。相互尊重司法和辩护人的独立性,使辩护人和法院在民事诉讼中的诉讼活动更加有效和有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interaction of the principle of independence of judges and the principle of independence of advocacy in civil proceedings
The article examines the forms of interaction of the eponymous principle of independence in the professional activities of a pleader and a judge in a civil process. The conditions of independence are necessary for the judge and the pleader to be free in political, economic and intellectual terms for the qualitative implementation of professional activities. The author concludes that the independence of a pleader, as well as the independence of judges, has its own limits in subordination to Constitution of Russian Federation and the law, guarantees of the independence of pleaders and judges are similar in content. Guarantees of the independence of professional activities of judges and pleaders in the Russian Federation are the organizational independence of the judicial system and the bar, the activities of the bodies of judicial and bar community, the ban on interference in their professional activities, as well as the ban on engaging in any activities other than those defined in the law. Mutual respect for judicial and pleader independence makes the procedural activities of the pleader and the court in civil proceedings more effective and rewarding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信