贝叶斯混合自动机:受不精确观测影响的相互作用混合系统的合理信念的形式化模型

P. Kröger, M. Fränzle
{"title":"贝叶斯混合自动机:受不精确观测影响的相互作用混合系统的合理信念的形式化模型","authors":"P. Kröger, M. Fränzle","doi":"10.4230/LITES.8.2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hybrid discrete-continuous system dynamics arises when discrete actions, e.g. by a decision al-gorithm, meet continuous behaviour, e.g. due to physical processes and continuous control. A nat-ural domain of such systems are emerging smart technologies which add elements of intelligence, cooperation, and adaptivity to physical entities, enabling them to interact with each other and with humans as systems of (human-)cyber-physical systems or (H)CPSes. Various flavours of hybrid automata have been suggested as a means to formally analyse CPS dynamics. In a previous article, we demonstrated that all these variants of hybrid automata provide inaccurate, in the sense of either overly pessimistic or overly optimistic, verdicts for engineered systems operating under imprecise observation of their environment due to, e.g., measurement error. We suggested a revised formal model, called Bayesian hybrid automata, that is able to represent state tracking and estimation in hybrid systems and thereby enhances precision of verdicts obtained from the model in comparison to traditional model variants. In this article, we present an extended definition of Bayesian hybrid automata which incorporates a new class of guard and invariant functions that allow to evaluate traditional guards and invariants over probability distributions. The resulting framework allows to model observers with knowledge about the control strategy of an observed agent but with imprecise estimates of the data on which the control decisions are based.","PeriodicalId":376325,"journal":{"name":"Leibniz Trans. Embed. Syst.","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bayesian Hybrid Automata: A Formal Model of Justified Belief in Interacting Hybrid Systems Subject to Imprecise Observation\",\"authors\":\"P. Kröger, M. Fränzle\",\"doi\":\"10.4230/LITES.8.2.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hybrid discrete-continuous system dynamics arises when discrete actions, e.g. by a decision al-gorithm, meet continuous behaviour, e.g. due to physical processes and continuous control. A nat-ural domain of such systems are emerging smart technologies which add elements of intelligence, cooperation, and adaptivity to physical entities, enabling them to interact with each other and with humans as systems of (human-)cyber-physical systems or (H)CPSes. Various flavours of hybrid automata have been suggested as a means to formally analyse CPS dynamics. In a previous article, we demonstrated that all these variants of hybrid automata provide inaccurate, in the sense of either overly pessimistic or overly optimistic, verdicts for engineered systems operating under imprecise observation of their environment due to, e.g., measurement error. We suggested a revised formal model, called Bayesian hybrid automata, that is able to represent state tracking and estimation in hybrid systems and thereby enhances precision of verdicts obtained from the model in comparison to traditional model variants. In this article, we present an extended definition of Bayesian hybrid automata which incorporates a new class of guard and invariant functions that allow to evaluate traditional guards and invariants over probability distributions. The resulting framework allows to model observers with knowledge about the control strategy of an observed agent but with imprecise estimates of the data on which the control decisions are based.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leibniz Trans. Embed. Syst.\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leibniz Trans. Embed. Syst.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4230/LITES.8.2.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leibniz Trans. Embed. Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LITES.8.2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

当离散行为(例如,通过决策算法)遇到连续行为(例如,由于物理过程和连续控制)时,就会出现混合离散-连续系统动力学。这种系统的一个自然领域是新兴的智能技术,这些技术为物理实体增加了智能、合作和适应性的元素,使它们能够作为(人类-)网络物理系统或(H) cps系统相互作用,并与人类互动。各种混合自动机已经被建议作为正式分析CPS动力学的一种手段。在之前的一篇文章中,我们证明了混合自动机的所有这些变体都提供了不准确的,在过度悲观或过度乐观的意义上,对于由于测量误差等原因而在不精确观察环境下运行的工程系统而言。我们提出了一种修正的形式模型,称为贝叶斯混合自动机,它能够表示混合系统中的状态跟踪和估计,从而与传统模型变体相比,提高了从模型获得的结论的精度。在本文中,我们提出了贝叶斯混合自动机的扩展定义,其中包含了一类新的保护和不变量函数,允许在概率分布上评估传统的保护和不变量。由此产生的框架允许对观察者建模,了解被观察代理的控制策略,但对控制决策所基于的数据进行不精确的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bayesian Hybrid Automata: A Formal Model of Justified Belief in Interacting Hybrid Systems Subject to Imprecise Observation
Hybrid discrete-continuous system dynamics arises when discrete actions, e.g. by a decision al-gorithm, meet continuous behaviour, e.g. due to physical processes and continuous control. A nat-ural domain of such systems are emerging smart technologies which add elements of intelligence, cooperation, and adaptivity to physical entities, enabling them to interact with each other and with humans as systems of (human-)cyber-physical systems or (H)CPSes. Various flavours of hybrid automata have been suggested as a means to formally analyse CPS dynamics. In a previous article, we demonstrated that all these variants of hybrid automata provide inaccurate, in the sense of either overly pessimistic or overly optimistic, verdicts for engineered systems operating under imprecise observation of their environment due to, e.g., measurement error. We suggested a revised formal model, called Bayesian hybrid automata, that is able to represent state tracking and estimation in hybrid systems and thereby enhances precision of verdicts obtained from the model in comparison to traditional model variants. In this article, we present an extended definition of Bayesian hybrid automata which incorporates a new class of guard and invariant functions that allow to evaluate traditional guards and invariants over probability distributions. The resulting framework allows to model observers with knowledge about the control strategy of an observed agent but with imprecise estimates of the data on which the control decisions are based.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信