10. 豁免条款及法例

E. MacDonald, R. Atkins, J. Krebs
{"title":"10. 豁免条款及法例","authors":"E. MacDonald, R. Atkins, J. Krebs","doi":"10.1093/HE/9780198752844.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter deals with the statutory policing of exemption clauses under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA) and addresses the changes to the law made by the Consumer Rights Act 2015. It explains the structure of UCTA and how to use it. It considers the different types of situations in which exemption clauses fall within it, under different sections (eg s2 negligence, s3 written standard terms of business, s6 and s7 goods contracts), and the need to consider whether a section renders a clause automatically ineffective or subjects it to the requirement of reasonableness. It looks at the application of the requirement of reasonableness and factors which have been identified as significant, such as the potential for insurance, the availability of alternatives, and reasons for a level of limitation. It considers the meaning of the UCTA’s definition of ‘deals as consumer’.","PeriodicalId":214244,"journal":{"name":"Koffman & Macdonald's Law of Contract","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"10. Exemption clauses and legislation\",\"authors\":\"E. MacDonald, R. Atkins, J. Krebs\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/HE/9780198752844.003.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter deals with the statutory policing of exemption clauses under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA) and addresses the changes to the law made by the Consumer Rights Act 2015. It explains the structure of UCTA and how to use it. It considers the different types of situations in which exemption clauses fall within it, under different sections (eg s2 negligence, s3 written standard terms of business, s6 and s7 goods contracts), and the need to consider whether a section renders a clause automatically ineffective or subjects it to the requirement of reasonableness. It looks at the application of the requirement of reasonableness and factors which have been identified as significant, such as the potential for insurance, the availability of alternatives, and reasons for a level of limitation. It considers the meaning of the UCTA’s definition of ‘deals as consumer’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":214244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Koffman & Macdonald's Law of Contract\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Koffman & Macdonald's Law of Contract\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/HE/9780198752844.003.0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koffman & Macdonald's Law of Contract","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/HE/9780198752844.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章涉及1977年《不公平合同条款法》(UCTA)下豁免条款的法定监管,并涉及2015年《消费者权益法》对法律的修改。它解释了UCTA的结构和如何使用它。它考虑了豁免条款在不同章节(例如第2条疏忽、第3条书面标准商业条款、第6条和第7条货物合同)下适用的不同类型的情况,以及是否需要考虑某一章节使条款自动失效或使其受到合理性要求的约束。它着眼于合理性要求的适用和已确定为重要的因素,例如保险的潜力、替代方案的可用性以及限制程度的原因。它考虑了UCTA对“作为消费者的交易”的定义的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
10. Exemption clauses and legislation
This chapter deals with the statutory policing of exemption clauses under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA) and addresses the changes to the law made by the Consumer Rights Act 2015. It explains the structure of UCTA and how to use it. It considers the different types of situations in which exemption clauses fall within it, under different sections (eg s2 negligence, s3 written standard terms of business, s6 and s7 goods contracts), and the need to consider whether a section renders a clause automatically ineffective or subjects it to the requirement of reasonableness. It looks at the application of the requirement of reasonableness and factors which have been identified as significant, such as the potential for insurance, the availability of alternatives, and reasons for a level of limitation. It considers the meaning of the UCTA’s definition of ‘deals as consumer’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信