推迟不可避免的:货币政策能促进南部非洲的环境可持续性吗?

O. Shobande
{"title":"推迟不可避免的:货币政策能促进南部非洲的环境可持续性吗?","authors":"O. Shobande","doi":"10.1353/jda.2022.0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Globally, stakeholders are desperate in search of appropriate monetary policy for promoting environmental sustainability and countering the threat of climate events. They have attempted to identify some mechanisms such as climate lending system, sound financial development, and interest rate to adjust pollution to tackle climate-related risk. These advocates of the monetary environment nexus proposed three key strategies. First, banks should lower rates to financing climate-related lending criteria. Second, consider lower financing rates for firms that embrace carbon footprints. Third, central banks (CBs) must reconsider financing condition-based threshold of lending and climate risk disclosure. To heighten the debate, the central banks are advised to favour green policies, even if there is a need to compromise stability and productivity to realise the objectives. However, the question of whether it is appropriate to include climate mandates as part of the central bank operational mandate remains controversial. This is because the CBs, climatologists and scientists are divided in opinion with regards to using monetary policy to promote environmental sustainability without creating distortion in the system. More so, the persistent questions include how fast and at what cost can a monetary policy promote environmental sustainability. The extent of the aftermath, which is associated with the failure of monetary authorities in encouraging sustainability and the complications arising during economic activities in Africa, remains unknown. In addition to physical risk, bubble assets, slow farm productivity, prolonged growth, and other factors remain a concern. Although climate change is widely believed to impact only agriculture and energy, the banking sector is insecure due to the risk of imminent financial crises. This study investigates whether a monetary policy can promote climate financing in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). The SADC is selected as the candidate of inquiry because it has been identified as a potential hotspot of climate events. The empirical evidence is based on Westerlund cointegration that accounts for cross-sectional dependency and the Panel Vector Autoregressive/ Panel Vector Error Correction methodology. The findings indicate that a long-lasting relationship exists among the factors; however, the monetary policy induces sustainability with a feedback effect on the economy. Therefore, the mandates of CBs differ and handling financial stability as well as climate-related concerns may cause distortions that go beyond existing monetary instruments.","PeriodicalId":286315,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Developing Areas","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postponing the Inevitable: Can Monetary Policy Promote Environmental Sustainability in Southern Africa?\",\"authors\":\"O. Shobande\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jda.2022.0045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:Globally, stakeholders are desperate in search of appropriate monetary policy for promoting environmental sustainability and countering the threat of climate events. They have attempted to identify some mechanisms such as climate lending system, sound financial development, and interest rate to adjust pollution to tackle climate-related risk. These advocates of the monetary environment nexus proposed three key strategies. First, banks should lower rates to financing climate-related lending criteria. Second, consider lower financing rates for firms that embrace carbon footprints. Third, central banks (CBs) must reconsider financing condition-based threshold of lending and climate risk disclosure. To heighten the debate, the central banks are advised to favour green policies, even if there is a need to compromise stability and productivity to realise the objectives. However, the question of whether it is appropriate to include climate mandates as part of the central bank operational mandate remains controversial. This is because the CBs, climatologists and scientists are divided in opinion with regards to using monetary policy to promote environmental sustainability without creating distortion in the system. More so, the persistent questions include how fast and at what cost can a monetary policy promote environmental sustainability. The extent of the aftermath, which is associated with the failure of monetary authorities in encouraging sustainability and the complications arising during economic activities in Africa, remains unknown. In addition to physical risk, bubble assets, slow farm productivity, prolonged growth, and other factors remain a concern. Although climate change is widely believed to impact only agriculture and energy, the banking sector is insecure due to the risk of imminent financial crises. This study investigates whether a monetary policy can promote climate financing in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). The SADC is selected as the candidate of inquiry because it has been identified as a potential hotspot of climate events. The empirical evidence is based on Westerlund cointegration that accounts for cross-sectional dependency and the Panel Vector Autoregressive/ Panel Vector Error Correction methodology. The findings indicate that a long-lasting relationship exists among the factors; however, the monetary policy induces sustainability with a feedback effect on the economy. Therefore, the mandates of CBs differ and handling financial stability as well as climate-related concerns may cause distortions that go beyond existing monetary instruments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Developing Areas\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Developing Areas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2022.0045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Developing Areas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2022.0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在全球范围内,利益相关者迫切需要合适的货币政策来促进环境可持续性和应对气候事件的威胁。他们试图确定一些机制,如气候贷款制度、健全的金融发展和利率来调节污染,以应对与气候相关的风险。这些货币环境联系的倡导者提出了三个关键策略。首先,银行应降低利率,以满足与气候相关的贷款标准。其次,考虑降低碳足迹企业的融资利率。第三,央行必须重新考虑融资条件贷款门槛和气候风险披露。为了加剧争论,有人建议各国央行支持绿色政策,即使为了实现这些目标,需要牺牲稳定和生产率。然而,将气候任务作为央行业务任务的一部分是否合适的问题仍然存在争议。这是因为央行、气候学家和科学家在利用货币政策促进环境可持续性而不造成系统扭曲的问题上存在分歧。更重要的是,持续存在的问题包括,货币政策促进环境可持续性的速度有多快,代价有多大。与货币当局未能鼓励可持续性和非洲经济活动期间出现的复杂情况有关的后果的程度仍然不得而知。除了实物风险外,泡沫资产、农业生产率缓慢、经济增长时间过长等因素仍令人担忧。尽管人们普遍认为气候变化只会影响农业和能源,但由于金融危机迫在眉睫的风险,银行业是不安全的。本研究探讨了货币政策是否能够促进南部非洲发展共同体(SADC)的气候融资。南共体被选为调查候选者,因为它已被确定为气候事件的潜在热点。经验证据基于Westerlund协整,该协整考虑了横截面依赖性和面板向量自回归/面板向量误差校正方法。研究结果表明,这些因素之间存在着长期的关系;然而,货币政策通过对经济的反馈效应诱导可持续性。因此,央行的任务不同,处理金融稳定以及气候相关问题可能会造成超出现有货币工具范围的扭曲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postponing the Inevitable: Can Monetary Policy Promote Environmental Sustainability in Southern Africa?
ABSTRACT:Globally, stakeholders are desperate in search of appropriate monetary policy for promoting environmental sustainability and countering the threat of climate events. They have attempted to identify some mechanisms such as climate lending system, sound financial development, and interest rate to adjust pollution to tackle climate-related risk. These advocates of the monetary environment nexus proposed three key strategies. First, banks should lower rates to financing climate-related lending criteria. Second, consider lower financing rates for firms that embrace carbon footprints. Third, central banks (CBs) must reconsider financing condition-based threshold of lending and climate risk disclosure. To heighten the debate, the central banks are advised to favour green policies, even if there is a need to compromise stability and productivity to realise the objectives. However, the question of whether it is appropriate to include climate mandates as part of the central bank operational mandate remains controversial. This is because the CBs, climatologists and scientists are divided in opinion with regards to using monetary policy to promote environmental sustainability without creating distortion in the system. More so, the persistent questions include how fast and at what cost can a monetary policy promote environmental sustainability. The extent of the aftermath, which is associated with the failure of monetary authorities in encouraging sustainability and the complications arising during economic activities in Africa, remains unknown. In addition to physical risk, bubble assets, slow farm productivity, prolonged growth, and other factors remain a concern. Although climate change is widely believed to impact only agriculture and energy, the banking sector is insecure due to the risk of imminent financial crises. This study investigates whether a monetary policy can promote climate financing in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). The SADC is selected as the candidate of inquiry because it has been identified as a potential hotspot of climate events. The empirical evidence is based on Westerlund cointegration that accounts for cross-sectional dependency and the Panel Vector Autoregressive/ Panel Vector Error Correction methodology. The findings indicate that a long-lasting relationship exists among the factors; however, the monetary policy induces sustainability with a feedback effect on the economy. Therefore, the mandates of CBs differ and handling financial stability as well as climate-related concerns may cause distortions that go beyond existing monetary instruments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信