腹股沟疝手术的现代方法

V. P. Shkaraban, I. Bulyk, S. Vasyliuk, O. Prudnikov, I. R. Labyak, S. V. Bitska, N. Pavliuk
{"title":"腹股沟疝手术的现代方法","authors":"V. P. Shkaraban, I. Bulyk, S. Vasyliuk, O. Prudnikov, I. R. Labyak, S. V. Bitska, N. Pavliuk","doi":"10.37699/2308-7005.1-2.2023.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary. The article analyzes modern clinical guidelines for the repair of inguinal hernias. In 2018, the Hernia Surge Group published clinical guidelines for inguinal hernia repair. Experts evaluated the effectiveness, advantages and disadvantages of many currently known methods of hernia repair, and with a high level of evidence recommended choosing two open (Shouldice and Lichtenstein) and two laparoscopic techniques (TAPP and TER). The Shouldice operation is considered the best if it is decided to choose inguinal hernia repair without a mesh. However, modern trends in the repair of inguinal hernias still lean toward tension-free techniques, regardless of the age and gender of the patient. Even in young men with various types of hernias, it is recommended to use a prolene mesh, which reduces the risk of recurrence without impairing sexual function and fertility indicators. The Lichtenstein repair is the standard for open (anterior) inguinal hernia repair. In endoscopic TAPP and TEP repairs, the mesh is inserted into the preperitoneal space, but the techniques differ in access to this space. Due to technical complexity and high cost, laparoscopic and endoscopic repair of inguinal hernias is primarily recommended for recurrent and bilateral hernias, as well as for comorbid operations. Both TAPP and TEP have different and rare but serious complications. The 2018 EHS guidelines recommend open (Lichtenstein) and endoscopic (TEP/TAPP) as equivalent and evidence-based options for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair.","PeriodicalId":405037,"journal":{"name":"Kharkiv Surgical School","volume":"44 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MODERN APPROACH TO INGUINAL HERNIA SURGERY\",\"authors\":\"V. P. Shkaraban, I. Bulyk, S. Vasyliuk, O. Prudnikov, I. R. Labyak, S. V. Bitska, N. Pavliuk\",\"doi\":\"10.37699/2308-7005.1-2.2023.31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary. The article analyzes modern clinical guidelines for the repair of inguinal hernias. In 2018, the Hernia Surge Group published clinical guidelines for inguinal hernia repair. Experts evaluated the effectiveness, advantages and disadvantages of many currently known methods of hernia repair, and with a high level of evidence recommended choosing two open (Shouldice and Lichtenstein) and two laparoscopic techniques (TAPP and TER). The Shouldice operation is considered the best if it is decided to choose inguinal hernia repair without a mesh. However, modern trends in the repair of inguinal hernias still lean toward tension-free techniques, regardless of the age and gender of the patient. Even in young men with various types of hernias, it is recommended to use a prolene mesh, which reduces the risk of recurrence without impairing sexual function and fertility indicators. The Lichtenstein repair is the standard for open (anterior) inguinal hernia repair. In endoscopic TAPP and TEP repairs, the mesh is inserted into the preperitoneal space, but the techniques differ in access to this space. Due to technical complexity and high cost, laparoscopic and endoscopic repair of inguinal hernias is primarily recommended for recurrent and bilateral hernias, as well as for comorbid operations. Both TAPP and TEP have different and rare but serious complications. The 2018 EHS guidelines recommend open (Lichtenstein) and endoscopic (TEP/TAPP) as equivalent and evidence-based options for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kharkiv Surgical School\",\"volume\":\"44 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kharkiv Surgical School\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37699/2308-7005.1-2.2023.31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kharkiv Surgical School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37699/2308-7005.1-2.2023.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

总结。本文分析了腹股沟疝修补术的现代临床指南。2018年,Hernia Surge Group发布了腹股沟疝修补临床指南。专家评估了许多目前已知的疝修补方法的有效性和优缺点,并以高水平的证据推荐选择两种开放式(Shouldice和Lichtenstein)和两种腹腔镜技术(TAPP和TER)。如果决定选择不带补片的腹股沟疝修补术,则应选择Shouldice手术。然而,在修补腹股沟疝的现代趋势仍然倾向于无张力的技术,不管病人的年龄和性别。即使在患有各种类型疝气的年轻男性中,也建议使用prolene网片,这样可以降低复发的风险,同时又不会损害性功能和生育指标。Lichtenstein修补术是开放式(前)腹股沟疝修补术的标准。在内窥镜TAPP和TEP修复中,将补片插入腹膜前间隙,但进入该间隙的技术不同。由于技术复杂、成本高,腹股沟疝的腹腔镜和内镜修复主要推荐用于复发性和双侧疝,以及合并症手术。TAPP和TEP都有不同且罕见但严重的并发症。2018年EHS指南推荐开放式(Lichtenstein)和内窥镜(TEP/TAPP)作为原发性单侧腹股沟疝修复的同等和循证选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MODERN APPROACH TO INGUINAL HERNIA SURGERY
Summary. The article analyzes modern clinical guidelines for the repair of inguinal hernias. In 2018, the Hernia Surge Group published clinical guidelines for inguinal hernia repair. Experts evaluated the effectiveness, advantages and disadvantages of many currently known methods of hernia repair, and with a high level of evidence recommended choosing two open (Shouldice and Lichtenstein) and two laparoscopic techniques (TAPP and TER). The Shouldice operation is considered the best if it is decided to choose inguinal hernia repair without a mesh. However, modern trends in the repair of inguinal hernias still lean toward tension-free techniques, regardless of the age and gender of the patient. Even in young men with various types of hernias, it is recommended to use a prolene mesh, which reduces the risk of recurrence without impairing sexual function and fertility indicators. The Lichtenstein repair is the standard for open (anterior) inguinal hernia repair. In endoscopic TAPP and TEP repairs, the mesh is inserted into the preperitoneal space, but the techniques differ in access to this space. Due to technical complexity and high cost, laparoscopic and endoscopic repair of inguinal hernias is primarily recommended for recurrent and bilateral hernias, as well as for comorbid operations. Both TAPP and TEP have different and rare but serious complications. The 2018 EHS guidelines recommend open (Lichtenstein) and endoscopic (TEP/TAPP) as equivalent and evidence-based options for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信