牛粪、禽粪厌氧消化餐厨垃圾是克服单厌氧消化问题,提高沼气产量的一种手段

Mahmoud Saber, R. El-Khayat, Yahy Zean Zean, Salah Elsayed Elsayed, M. El-Howeity
{"title":"牛粪、禽粪厌氧消化餐厨垃圾是克服单厌氧消化问题,提高沼气产量的一种手段","authors":"Mahmoud Saber, R. El-Khayat, Yahy Zean Zean, Salah Elsayed Elsayed, M. El-Howeity","doi":"10.21608/ijesr.2023.309140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anaerobic mono digestion usually suffers from several problems at high rates of organic load, which leads to a negative effect on the activity of methane producing bacteria, which leads to a decrease in biogas production. Therefore, it is important to find scientific alternatives to overcome these problems. In this study, the low efficiency of anaerobic mono digestion of kitchen waste was efficiently overcome by anaerobic co digestion of kitchen waste with cattle dung and poultry manure. The results indicated that anaerobic co digestion for kitchen waste with cattle dung (T4) has significantly increased the production of biogas more than anaerobic mono digestion for kitchen waste (T3). The obtained results showed that the produced biogas ranged from 17.68 to 30.95 L, and the highest production was observed from T1 (cattle manure and starter), followed by T4 (kitchen waste, cattle dung and starter) and the lowest production resulting from T2 (poultry manure and starter). The results also indicated that methane production ranged from 10.08 to 19.87 liters, and that T1 (cattle manure and starter) was more productive than T4 (kitchen waste, cattle dung and starter), and T4 outperformed other treatments in methane pro ِduction. Biogas and methane production rates were based on either total solid or volatile solid where, ranged between 136.53-189.96 L/Kg consumed biogas and 77.84-121.95 L/Kg consumed methane. Volatile fatty acids concentration was decreased after anaerobic fermentation process. Also, the pH values increased at the end of anaerobic digestion the values ranged between 7.65-8.02. After anaerobic digestion, the total and faecal coliform count as well as Salmonella & Shigella were not discovered. The numbers of total bacterial count, aerobic cellulose decomposers and acid producers (aerobic and anaerobic) were decreased after anaerobic digestion. In contrast, the numbers of anaerobic cellulose decomposers were increased after anaerobic digestion.","PeriodicalId":169728,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Studies and Researches","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anaerobic Co Digestion of Kitchen Waste With Cattle Dung and Poultry Manure A Means to Overcome The Problems of Anaerobic Mono Digestion and Improve The Production of Biogas\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud Saber, R. El-Khayat, Yahy Zean Zean, Salah Elsayed Elsayed, M. El-Howeity\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ijesr.2023.309140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anaerobic mono digestion usually suffers from several problems at high rates of organic load, which leads to a negative effect on the activity of methane producing bacteria, which leads to a decrease in biogas production. Therefore, it is important to find scientific alternatives to overcome these problems. In this study, the low efficiency of anaerobic mono digestion of kitchen waste was efficiently overcome by anaerobic co digestion of kitchen waste with cattle dung and poultry manure. The results indicated that anaerobic co digestion for kitchen waste with cattle dung (T4) has significantly increased the production of biogas more than anaerobic mono digestion for kitchen waste (T3). The obtained results showed that the produced biogas ranged from 17.68 to 30.95 L, and the highest production was observed from T1 (cattle manure and starter), followed by T4 (kitchen waste, cattle dung and starter) and the lowest production resulting from T2 (poultry manure and starter). The results also indicated that methane production ranged from 10.08 to 19.87 liters, and that T1 (cattle manure and starter) was more productive than T4 (kitchen waste, cattle dung and starter), and T4 outperformed other treatments in methane pro ِduction. Biogas and methane production rates were based on either total solid or volatile solid where, ranged between 136.53-189.96 L/Kg consumed biogas and 77.84-121.95 L/Kg consumed methane. Volatile fatty acids concentration was decreased after anaerobic fermentation process. Also, the pH values increased at the end of anaerobic digestion the values ranged between 7.65-8.02. After anaerobic digestion, the total and faecal coliform count as well as Salmonella & Shigella were not discovered. The numbers of total bacterial count, aerobic cellulose decomposers and acid producers (aerobic and anaerobic) were decreased after anaerobic digestion. In contrast, the numbers of anaerobic cellulose decomposers were increased after anaerobic digestion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environmental Studies and Researches\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environmental Studies and Researches\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ijesr.2023.309140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Studies and Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ijesr.2023.309140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在高有机负荷下,厌氧单消化通常会遇到几个问题,这会对产甲烷细菌的活性产生负面影响,从而导致沼气产量减少。因此,找到科学的替代方案来克服这些问题是很重要的。本研究通过将餐厨垃圾与牛粪、禽粪进行厌氧共消化,有效地克服了餐厨垃圾单厌氧消化效率低的问题。结果表明,餐厨垃圾与牛粪厌氧共消化(T4)比单厌氧消化(T3)更能显著提高餐厨垃圾的沼气产量。结果表明:产气量在17.68 ~ 30.95 L之间,T1(牛粪和发酵剂)产气量最高,T4(厨余、牛粪和发酵剂)产气量次之,T2(禽粪和发酵剂)产气量最低。甲烷产量在10.08 ~ 19.87 l之间,T1处理(牛粪和发酵剂)的甲烷产量高于T4处理(厨余、牛粪和发酵剂),T4处理的甲烷产量优于其他处理ِduction。沼气和甲烷产率基于总固体或挥发性固体,其中沼气消耗136.53-189.96 L/Kg,甲烷消耗77.84-121.95 L/Kg。厌氧发酵后挥发性脂肪酸浓度降低。厌氧消化结束时pH值升高,在7.65 ~ 8.02之间。经厌氧消化后,未检出总大肠菌群和粪便大肠菌群计数,也未检出沙门氏菌和志贺氏菌。厌氧消化后细菌总数、好氧纤维素分解菌和产酸菌(好氧和厌氧)数量均下降。相反,厌氧消化后,厌氧纤维素分解者数量增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anaerobic Co Digestion of Kitchen Waste With Cattle Dung and Poultry Manure A Means to Overcome The Problems of Anaerobic Mono Digestion and Improve The Production of Biogas
Anaerobic mono digestion usually suffers from several problems at high rates of organic load, which leads to a negative effect on the activity of methane producing bacteria, which leads to a decrease in biogas production. Therefore, it is important to find scientific alternatives to overcome these problems. In this study, the low efficiency of anaerobic mono digestion of kitchen waste was efficiently overcome by anaerobic co digestion of kitchen waste with cattle dung and poultry manure. The results indicated that anaerobic co digestion for kitchen waste with cattle dung (T4) has significantly increased the production of biogas more than anaerobic mono digestion for kitchen waste (T3). The obtained results showed that the produced biogas ranged from 17.68 to 30.95 L, and the highest production was observed from T1 (cattle manure and starter), followed by T4 (kitchen waste, cattle dung and starter) and the lowest production resulting from T2 (poultry manure and starter). The results also indicated that methane production ranged from 10.08 to 19.87 liters, and that T1 (cattle manure and starter) was more productive than T4 (kitchen waste, cattle dung and starter), and T4 outperformed other treatments in methane pro ِduction. Biogas and methane production rates were based on either total solid or volatile solid where, ranged between 136.53-189.96 L/Kg consumed biogas and 77.84-121.95 L/Kg consumed methane. Volatile fatty acids concentration was decreased after anaerobic fermentation process. Also, the pH values increased at the end of anaerobic digestion the values ranged between 7.65-8.02. After anaerobic digestion, the total and faecal coliform count as well as Salmonella & Shigella were not discovered. The numbers of total bacterial count, aerobic cellulose decomposers and acid producers (aerobic and anaerobic) were decreased after anaerobic digestion. In contrast, the numbers of anaerobic cellulose decomposers were increased after anaerobic digestion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信