W. M. Juárez, M. Huerín, M. Lobo, G. Masson, Dona Websmaster, N. Fernández, G. Micali, Mariano Nemec, C. Romero, G. Molinero
{"title":"糖尿病患者的血脂目标。低密度脂蛋白胆固醇计算新公式应用后的临床意义","authors":"W. M. Juárez, M. Huerín, M. Lobo, G. Masson, Dona Websmaster, N. Fernández, G. Micali, Mariano Nemec, C. Romero, G. Molinero","doi":"10.7775/RAC.88.1.16342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There are clear recommendations for lipid management in diabetic patients. A new formula for the calculation of LDLcholesterol(LDL-C) would improve the inaccuracy of the Friedewald formula.Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the use of statins and the fulfillment of lipid goals in diabetic patients, evaluatingthe consequences of applying a new formula for LDL-C calculation.Methods: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter study including type 2 diabetic patients over 18 years of age. LDL-Cwas calculated using the classic Friedewald formula and the new formula. Recommendations of the position document for the appropriateuse of statins from the Argentine Society of Cardiology were followed.Results: A total of 528 patients were included in the study. In secondary prevention, 77.2% of patients received statins (23.4% highintensitystatins) and 36.6% and 36.0% of these patients achieved the goals of LDL-C below 70% mg/dl and non-HDL-C below 100mg/dl, respectively. In 20.8% of patients with LDL-C below 70 mg/dl according to the Friedewald formula, this goal was not attainedwhen the new formula was applied. In primary prevention, 62.2% patients with risk factors or white organ damage received statins(14.7% high-intensity statins) and 20.9% and 20.4% achieved the goals of LDL-C below 70% mg/dl and non-HDL-C below 100 mg/dl. In 27.7% of patients with LDL-C below 70 mg/dl using the Friedewald formula, this goal was not reached when applying the newformula. More patients did not achieve the LDL-C goal with the new formula when the triglyceride level was higher.Conclusion: In this population, the appropriate use of statins and the fulfillment of lipid goals were poor. Applying the new LDL-Cformula optimized the evaluation of these patients.","PeriodicalId":447734,"journal":{"name":"Argentine Journal of Cardiology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lipid Goals in Diabetic Patients. Clinical Implications after Application of a New Formula for LDL-cholesterol Calculation\",\"authors\":\"W. M. Juárez, M. Huerín, M. Lobo, G. Masson, Dona Websmaster, N. Fernández, G. Micali, Mariano Nemec, C. Romero, G. Molinero\",\"doi\":\"10.7775/RAC.88.1.16342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: There are clear recommendations for lipid management in diabetic patients. A new formula for the calculation of LDLcholesterol(LDL-C) would improve the inaccuracy of the Friedewald formula.Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the use of statins and the fulfillment of lipid goals in diabetic patients, evaluatingthe consequences of applying a new formula for LDL-C calculation.Methods: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter study including type 2 diabetic patients over 18 years of age. LDL-Cwas calculated using the classic Friedewald formula and the new formula. Recommendations of the position document for the appropriateuse of statins from the Argentine Society of Cardiology were followed.Results: A total of 528 patients were included in the study. In secondary prevention, 77.2% of patients received statins (23.4% highintensitystatins) and 36.6% and 36.0% of these patients achieved the goals of LDL-C below 70% mg/dl and non-HDL-C below 100mg/dl, respectively. In 20.8% of patients with LDL-C below 70 mg/dl according to the Friedewald formula, this goal was not attainedwhen the new formula was applied. In primary prevention, 62.2% patients with risk factors or white organ damage received statins(14.7% high-intensity statins) and 20.9% and 20.4% achieved the goals of LDL-C below 70% mg/dl and non-HDL-C below 100 mg/dl. In 27.7% of patients with LDL-C below 70 mg/dl using the Friedewald formula, this goal was not reached when applying the newformula. More patients did not achieve the LDL-C goal with the new formula when the triglyceride level was higher.Conclusion: In this population, the appropriate use of statins and the fulfillment of lipid goals were poor. Applying the new LDL-Cformula optimized the evaluation of these patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Argentine Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Argentine Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7775/RAC.88.1.16342\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argentine Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7775/RAC.88.1.16342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lipid Goals in Diabetic Patients. Clinical Implications after Application of a New Formula for LDL-cholesterol Calculation
Background: There are clear recommendations for lipid management in diabetic patients. A new formula for the calculation of LDLcholesterol(LDL-C) would improve the inaccuracy of the Friedewald formula.Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the use of statins and the fulfillment of lipid goals in diabetic patients, evaluatingthe consequences of applying a new formula for LDL-C calculation.Methods: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter study including type 2 diabetic patients over 18 years of age. LDL-Cwas calculated using the classic Friedewald formula and the new formula. Recommendations of the position document for the appropriateuse of statins from the Argentine Society of Cardiology were followed.Results: A total of 528 patients were included in the study. In secondary prevention, 77.2% of patients received statins (23.4% highintensitystatins) and 36.6% and 36.0% of these patients achieved the goals of LDL-C below 70% mg/dl and non-HDL-C below 100mg/dl, respectively. In 20.8% of patients with LDL-C below 70 mg/dl according to the Friedewald formula, this goal was not attainedwhen the new formula was applied. In primary prevention, 62.2% patients with risk factors or white organ damage received statins(14.7% high-intensity statins) and 20.9% and 20.4% achieved the goals of LDL-C below 70% mg/dl and non-HDL-C below 100 mg/dl. In 27.7% of patients with LDL-C below 70 mg/dl using the Friedewald formula, this goal was not reached when applying the newformula. More patients did not achieve the LDL-C goal with the new formula when the triglyceride level was higher.Conclusion: In this population, the appropriate use of statins and the fulfillment of lipid goals were poor. Applying the new LDL-Cformula optimized the evaluation of these patients.