井口疲劳:结构可靠性分析应用于井组的好处

T. Hørte, M. Macke, A. Aardal, L. Reinås, P. Bjønnes, Erik Kristian Thon Frimanslund
{"title":"井口疲劳:结构可靠性分析应用于井组的好处","authors":"T. Hørte, M. Macke, A. Aardal, L. Reinås, P. Bjønnes, Erik Kristian Thon Frimanslund","doi":"10.1115/omae2019-96214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper outlines the methodology when performing structural reliability analysis (SRA) for wellhead fatigue of a complete field compared to individual wells. The field consist of several well and template systems from different suppliers. Further this paper will emphasize on added knowledge that can arise from the field vs. well analysis approach. Finally, some advice and guiding on necessary prerequisites for launching a field SRA will be shared.\n The methodology followed previous advices, with the added element that all wells were categorized depending on similarities in well design. Furthermore, a number of local finite element analyses for a specified systematic set of variations in input parameters have been performed by relevant equipment manufacturers to calculate the fatigue stress at critical hot spots (load-to-stress curves).\n Similar actions on loads had to be performed. A comprehensive set of global load analyses for each of the different rigs that have been operating on the field where needed to assess the cyclic fatigue loads from historical operations on each well. Finally, global and local analysis results were then gathered, and used as input to the SRA combined with a response surface technique.\n The additional effort for making the underlying global and local analyses covering all wells, and not only a single well, is limited for a given type of wellhead system. The field results now provide the operator with an improved basis for planning of future operations on the field, and enables optimization of the drilling plan and utilization of rigs throughout the varying environmental conditions for different seasons of the year and different operations, while managing the associated risk.","PeriodicalId":314553,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3: Structures, Safety, and Reliability","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wellhead Fatigue: Benefits of Structural Reliability Analysis Applied to Groups of Wells\",\"authors\":\"T. Hørte, M. Macke, A. Aardal, L. Reinås, P. Bjønnes, Erik Kristian Thon Frimanslund\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/omae2019-96214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper outlines the methodology when performing structural reliability analysis (SRA) for wellhead fatigue of a complete field compared to individual wells. The field consist of several well and template systems from different suppliers. Further this paper will emphasize on added knowledge that can arise from the field vs. well analysis approach. Finally, some advice and guiding on necessary prerequisites for launching a field SRA will be shared.\\n The methodology followed previous advices, with the added element that all wells were categorized depending on similarities in well design. Furthermore, a number of local finite element analyses for a specified systematic set of variations in input parameters have been performed by relevant equipment manufacturers to calculate the fatigue stress at critical hot spots (load-to-stress curves).\\n Similar actions on loads had to be performed. A comprehensive set of global load analyses for each of the different rigs that have been operating on the field where needed to assess the cyclic fatigue loads from historical operations on each well. Finally, global and local analysis results were then gathered, and used as input to the SRA combined with a response surface technique.\\n The additional effort for making the underlying global and local analyses covering all wells, and not only a single well, is limited for a given type of wellhead system. The field results now provide the operator with an improved basis for planning of future operations on the field, and enables optimization of the drilling plan and utilization of rigs throughout the varying environmental conditions for different seasons of the year and different operations, while managing the associated risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 3: Structures, Safety, and Reliability\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 3: Structures, Safety, and Reliability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2019-96214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3: Structures, Safety, and Reliability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2019-96214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文概述了与单井相比,对整个油田的井口疲劳进行结构可靠性分析(SRA)的方法。该油田由来自不同供应商的几个井和模板系统组成。此外,本文将强调现场分析方法与井分析方法之间可能产生的附加知识。最后,就开展野外SRA的必要条件提出一些建议和指导。该方法遵循了之前的建议,并根据井设计的相似性对所有井进行了分类。此外,相关设备制造商对输入参数的特定系统变化集进行了一些局部有限元分析,以计算关键热点处的疲劳应力(载荷-应力曲线)。必须对负载执行类似的操作。一套全面的全球载荷分析,用于评估每口井历史作业的循环疲劳载荷。最后,收集全局和局部分析结果,并结合响应面技术作为SRA的输入。对于特定类型的井口系统来说,额外的工作是对所有井进行全局和局部分析,而不仅仅是对单井进行分析。现在,现场结果为作业者提供了更好的基础来规划未来的现场作业,并能够在不同的环境条件下,在不同的季节和不同的作业中优化钻井计划和钻机的利用率,同时管理相关的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wellhead Fatigue: Benefits of Structural Reliability Analysis Applied to Groups of Wells
This paper outlines the methodology when performing structural reliability analysis (SRA) for wellhead fatigue of a complete field compared to individual wells. The field consist of several well and template systems from different suppliers. Further this paper will emphasize on added knowledge that can arise from the field vs. well analysis approach. Finally, some advice and guiding on necessary prerequisites for launching a field SRA will be shared. The methodology followed previous advices, with the added element that all wells were categorized depending on similarities in well design. Furthermore, a number of local finite element analyses for a specified systematic set of variations in input parameters have been performed by relevant equipment manufacturers to calculate the fatigue stress at critical hot spots (load-to-stress curves). Similar actions on loads had to be performed. A comprehensive set of global load analyses for each of the different rigs that have been operating on the field where needed to assess the cyclic fatigue loads from historical operations on each well. Finally, global and local analysis results were then gathered, and used as input to the SRA combined with a response surface technique. The additional effort for making the underlying global and local analyses covering all wells, and not only a single well, is limited for a given type of wellhead system. The field results now provide the operator with an improved basis for planning of future operations on the field, and enables optimization of the drilling plan and utilization of rigs throughout the varying environmental conditions for different seasons of the year and different operations, while managing the associated risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信