导论:数学文本的历史解释和时代错误问题

N. Guicciardini
{"title":"导论:数学文本的历史解释和时代错误问题","authors":"N. Guicciardini","doi":"10.1017/9781108874564.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": I provide a definition of “anachronism” as well as an overview of the different positions concerning anachronism taken by historians of mathematics, since the important debate on the “algebra” of the Baby-lonians and the “geometrical algebra” of Euclid and Apollonius. Should we stress the continuity of past mathematics with the mathematics prac-ticed today, or should we emphasize its difference, namely what makes it a product of a distant, Babylonian or Greek, mathematical culture? The issue of anachronism is a vexed one in historical interpretation, but is particularly thorny when one attempts to historicize a discipline that is, perhaps naively, celebrated for being independent of the context. The overview made available in this chapter provides the reader with information on the historiographical background against which the following chapters have been written.","PeriodicalId":325706,"journal":{"name":"Anachronisms in the History of Mathematics","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: The historical interpretation of mathematical texts and the problem of anachronism\",\"authors\":\"N. Guicciardini\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781108874564.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": I provide a definition of “anachronism” as well as an overview of the different positions concerning anachronism taken by historians of mathematics, since the important debate on the “algebra” of the Baby-lonians and the “geometrical algebra” of Euclid and Apollonius. Should we stress the continuity of past mathematics with the mathematics prac-ticed today, or should we emphasize its difference, namely what makes it a product of a distant, Babylonian or Greek, mathematical culture? The issue of anachronism is a vexed one in historical interpretation, but is particularly thorny when one attempts to historicize a discipline that is, perhaps naively, celebrated for being independent of the context. The overview made available in this chapter provides the reader with information on the historiographical background against which the following chapters have been written.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anachronisms in the History of Mathematics\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anachronisms in the History of Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108874564.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anachronisms in the History of Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108874564.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我提供了一个“时代错误”的定义,并概述了数学历史学家对时代错误所采取的不同立场,因为关于婴儿的“代数”和欧几里得和阿波罗尼乌斯的“几何代数”的重要辩论。我们是应该强调过去的数学与今天的数学的连续性,还是应该强调它的差异,即是什么使它成为遥远的巴比伦或希腊数学文化的产物?时代错误的问题在历史解释中是一个棘手的问题,但当一个人试图将一门学科历史化时,尤其棘手,这门学科可能天真地以独立于背景而闻名。本章提供的概述为读者提供了以下各章所依据的史学背景信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction: The historical interpretation of mathematical texts and the problem of anachronism
: I provide a definition of “anachronism” as well as an overview of the different positions concerning anachronism taken by historians of mathematics, since the important debate on the “algebra” of the Baby-lonians and the “geometrical algebra” of Euclid and Apollonius. Should we stress the continuity of past mathematics with the mathematics prac-ticed today, or should we emphasize its difference, namely what makes it a product of a distant, Babylonian or Greek, mathematical culture? The issue of anachronism is a vexed one in historical interpretation, but is particularly thorny when one attempts to historicize a discipline that is, perhaps naively, celebrated for being independent of the context. The overview made available in this chapter provides the reader with information on the historiographical background against which the following chapters have been written.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信