保障劳资破产的就业权利的法律保护

Edy Sony, Nugrah Gables Manery
{"title":"保障劳资破产的就业权利的法律保护","authors":"Edy Sony, Nugrah Gables Manery","doi":"10.47268/pela.v2i1.8373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Differences in legal position related to the division of bankruptcy between creditors holding collateral and labor rights in the of the Bankruptcy Law and in other laws and regulations will actually create legal uncertainty in providing guarantees of protection to labor rights and cause conflicts between legal norms. \nPurposes of the Research: To find out the various provisions of laws and regulations governing labor rights for the division of bankrupt debts and synchronization between Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy with other laws and regulations in regulating labor rights to the division of bankrupt and the application of legal protection of labor rights to the division of bankrupt debts.   \nMethods of the Research: The type of research used is normative juridical research. The nature of this research is descriptive. The data source used is secondary data. The nature of this research is descriptive analytical research and drawing conclusions using deductive methods. \nResults Originality of the Research: The research results show that the synchronization of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy with other provisions in the interpretation of the law has been assigned on the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18/PUU-VI/2008 and 67/PUU-XI/2013 that the payment of labor wages must take precedence over the bills of the state and separatist creditors while severance and other rights are granted after the compliance of the invoices of separatist creditors. In addition, the legal position for labor is determined by the Law and the decisions of the Constitutional Court as a preferred creditor of the proceeds of the sale of the boedel and its enforcement of the law refers to the lex specialis derogat lex generalis while take to consideration other term governing the rights of creditors. Legal implications to bankruptcy companies, the compliance of labor rights is determined by the proceeds of the sale of boedel which is based on the provisions in Article 95 of Law No. 11 of 2020 about Omnibus Law as amended from the provisions regulated in Law No. 13 of 2003 about Manpower, Article 49 and Article 50 of Government Regulation No. 36 of 2021 about Wages.","PeriodicalId":251089,"journal":{"name":"PATTIMURA Legal Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Hak-Hak Tenaga Kerja Dalam Pembagian Hutang Harta Pailit\",\"authors\":\"Edy Sony, Nugrah Gables Manery\",\"doi\":\"10.47268/pela.v2i1.8373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Differences in legal position related to the division of bankruptcy between creditors holding collateral and labor rights in the of the Bankruptcy Law and in other laws and regulations will actually create legal uncertainty in providing guarantees of protection to labor rights and cause conflicts between legal norms. \\nPurposes of the Research: To find out the various provisions of laws and regulations governing labor rights for the division of bankrupt debts and synchronization between Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy with other laws and regulations in regulating labor rights to the division of bankrupt and the application of legal protection of labor rights to the division of bankrupt debts.   \\nMethods of the Research: The type of research used is normative juridical research. The nature of this research is descriptive. The data source used is secondary data. The nature of this research is descriptive analytical research and drawing conclusions using deductive methods. \\nResults Originality of the Research: The research results show that the synchronization of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy with other provisions in the interpretation of the law has been assigned on the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18/PUU-VI/2008 and 67/PUU-XI/2013 that the payment of labor wages must take precedence over the bills of the state and separatist creditors while severance and other rights are granted after the compliance of the invoices of separatist creditors. In addition, the legal position for labor is determined by the Law and the decisions of the Constitutional Court as a preferred creditor of the proceeds of the sale of the boedel and its enforcement of the law refers to the lex specialis derogat lex generalis while take to consideration other term governing the rights of creditors. Legal implications to bankruptcy companies, the compliance of labor rights is determined by the proceeds of the sale of boedel which is based on the provisions in Article 95 of Law No. 11 of 2020 about Omnibus Law as amended from the provisions regulated in Law No. 13 of 2003 about Manpower, Article 49 and Article 50 of Government Regulation No. 36 of 2021 about Wages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":251089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PATTIMURA Legal Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PATTIMURA Legal Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v2i1.8373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PATTIMURA Legal Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v2i1.8373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:《破产法》和其他法律法规中关于抵押物债权人与劳工权利的破产划分的法律地位的差异,实际上会造成对劳工权利提供保障保护的法律不确定性,并导致法律规范之间的冲突。研究目的:了解法律法规对破产债务分割中劳动权利的各项规定,以及2004年《破产法》第37号法与其他法律法规对破产债务分割中劳动权利的同步规定,以及对破产债务分割中劳动权利法律保护的适用情况。研究方法:研究类型为规范法律研究。本研究的性质是描述性的。使用的数据源是辅助数据。本研究的性质是描述性分析研究,并使用演绎方法得出结论。研究原创性:此外,劳工的法律地位是由法律确定的,宪法法院作为出售债券所得收益的优先债权人的决定,其法律的执行参照特别法和克减法,同时考虑到管理债权人权利的其他条款。对破产公司的法律影响,劳工权利的遵守由出售boedel的收益决定,其依据是2020年第11号法第95条关于综合法的规定,该规定是根据2003年第13号法关于人力的规定、2021年第36号政府条例关于工资的规定第49条和第50条修正的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Hak-Hak Tenaga Kerja Dalam Pembagian Hutang Harta Pailit
Introduction: Differences in legal position related to the division of bankruptcy between creditors holding collateral and labor rights in the of the Bankruptcy Law and in other laws and regulations will actually create legal uncertainty in providing guarantees of protection to labor rights and cause conflicts between legal norms. Purposes of the Research: To find out the various provisions of laws and regulations governing labor rights for the division of bankrupt debts and synchronization between Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy with other laws and regulations in regulating labor rights to the division of bankrupt and the application of legal protection of labor rights to the division of bankrupt debts.   Methods of the Research: The type of research used is normative juridical research. The nature of this research is descriptive. The data source used is secondary data. The nature of this research is descriptive analytical research and drawing conclusions using deductive methods. Results Originality of the Research: The research results show that the synchronization of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy with other provisions in the interpretation of the law has been assigned on the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18/PUU-VI/2008 and 67/PUU-XI/2013 that the payment of labor wages must take precedence over the bills of the state and separatist creditors while severance and other rights are granted after the compliance of the invoices of separatist creditors. In addition, the legal position for labor is determined by the Law and the decisions of the Constitutional Court as a preferred creditor of the proceeds of the sale of the boedel and its enforcement of the law refers to the lex specialis derogat lex generalis while take to consideration other term governing the rights of creditors. Legal implications to bankruptcy companies, the compliance of labor rights is determined by the proceeds of the sale of boedel which is based on the provisions in Article 95 of Law No. 11 of 2020 about Omnibus Law as amended from the provisions regulated in Law No. 13 of 2003 about Manpower, Article 49 and Article 50 of Government Regulation No. 36 of 2021 about Wages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信