从玉米片到垃圾学:历史探究的动态

Stevan Kalmon, Peggy O'Neill-Jones, C. Stout, Linda Sargent Wood
{"title":"从玉米片到垃圾学:历史探究的动态","authors":"Stevan Kalmon, Peggy O'Neill-Jones, C. Stout, Linda Sargent Wood","doi":"10.1093/OAHMAG/OAS024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What can corn chips teach us about history? Quite a bit, as participants learned at a History Education Clearinghouse workshop at the 2011 American Historical Association annual meeting. Upon arriving for the workshop, we found sandwich baggies filled with golden-brown chips on every seat. Historian Laurel Thatcher Ulrich and Harvard Project Zero director Shari Tishman used the chips as artifacts to lead the participants through a See/Think/Wonder exercise. They provided a thinking routine that provokes inquiry about artifacts—even the mundane corn chip—that is useful for learners of all ages (Figure 1). By encouraging detailed observation and turning the ordinary into a voyage of exploration, See/Think/ Wonder teases out many historical questions and connections: from corn planters and pickers to ethnobotany and the history of cooking, from African American work songs to Native American creation stories, from agribusiness to manufacturing to ethanol (1). A month later, one of the authors of this article repeated the same exercise with a cohort of K–12 teachers. They noted how corn chips and the step-by-step thinking process provide a flexible vehicle for moving from personal connections through intriguing questions to investigation. After that workshop, one of the teachers decided to test the exercise with her fourth graders, giving them magnifying glasses to help them inspect the chips in greater detail. “Students came up with the same questions that our cohort came up with back in February,” Teresa Robbins reported. “I was so surprised and proud that they used higher order thinking skills to formulate these questions. They asked about the families that were involved in growing the corn, the brand and its historical significance, the factory that it was produced at, the packaging that was used, and many other questions” (2). As the corn chip story illustrates, a growing number of teachers are finding ways to cultivate these higher order skills and habits by engaging their students in a systematic process of historical inquiry (3). To help teachers think more deeply about the dynamics of inquiry and to foster it in their classrooms, this article presents a theoretical inquiry framework that provides context, purpose, and shape to historical thinking. We construct this framework by combining Barbara Stripling’s existing model of inquiry with our own Dual Inquiry (DI) model. Whereas Stripling’s model focuses on the learner’s inquiry process, the DI model captures inquiry from the teacher’s perspective, describing the dual roles of teacher-as-learner and teacher-as-teacher. With the aim of enabling teachers to draw practical inspiration from our model, we have provided a number of concrete illustrations, including applications to the upcoming year’s theme for National History Day.","PeriodicalId":346852,"journal":{"name":"OAH Magazine of History","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Corn Chips to Garbology: The Dynamics of Historical Inquiry\",\"authors\":\"Stevan Kalmon, Peggy O'Neill-Jones, C. Stout, Linda Sargent Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OAHMAG/OAS024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What can corn chips teach us about history? Quite a bit, as participants learned at a History Education Clearinghouse workshop at the 2011 American Historical Association annual meeting. Upon arriving for the workshop, we found sandwich baggies filled with golden-brown chips on every seat. Historian Laurel Thatcher Ulrich and Harvard Project Zero director Shari Tishman used the chips as artifacts to lead the participants through a See/Think/Wonder exercise. They provided a thinking routine that provokes inquiry about artifacts—even the mundane corn chip—that is useful for learners of all ages (Figure 1). By encouraging detailed observation and turning the ordinary into a voyage of exploration, See/Think/ Wonder teases out many historical questions and connections: from corn planters and pickers to ethnobotany and the history of cooking, from African American work songs to Native American creation stories, from agribusiness to manufacturing to ethanol (1). A month later, one of the authors of this article repeated the same exercise with a cohort of K–12 teachers. They noted how corn chips and the step-by-step thinking process provide a flexible vehicle for moving from personal connections through intriguing questions to investigation. After that workshop, one of the teachers decided to test the exercise with her fourth graders, giving them magnifying glasses to help them inspect the chips in greater detail. “Students came up with the same questions that our cohort came up with back in February,” Teresa Robbins reported. “I was so surprised and proud that they used higher order thinking skills to formulate these questions. They asked about the families that were involved in growing the corn, the brand and its historical significance, the factory that it was produced at, the packaging that was used, and many other questions” (2). As the corn chip story illustrates, a growing number of teachers are finding ways to cultivate these higher order skills and habits by engaging their students in a systematic process of historical inquiry (3). To help teachers think more deeply about the dynamics of inquiry and to foster it in their classrooms, this article presents a theoretical inquiry framework that provides context, purpose, and shape to historical thinking. We construct this framework by combining Barbara Stripling’s existing model of inquiry with our own Dual Inquiry (DI) model. Whereas Stripling’s model focuses on the learner’s inquiry process, the DI model captures inquiry from the teacher’s perspective, describing the dual roles of teacher-as-learner and teacher-as-teacher. With the aim of enabling teachers to draw practical inspiration from our model, we have provided a number of concrete illustrations, including applications to the upcoming year’s theme for National History Day.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OAH Magazine of History\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OAH Magazine of History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OAHMAG/OAS024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OAH Magazine of History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OAHMAG/OAS024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

关于历史,玉米片能告诉我们什么?在2011年美国历史协会年会上,与会者在历史教育交流中心研讨会上了解到,确实有很多。一到车间,我们就发现每个座位上都放着装满金棕色薯片的三明治袋。历史学家劳雷尔·撒切尔·乌尔里希和哈佛零号计划主管莎莉·蒂什曼用这些芯片作为人工制品,引导参与者进行“看/想/惊奇”练习。他们提供了一种思考程序,激发人们对人工制品的探究——甚至是平凡的玉米片——这对所有年龄段的学习者都很有用(图1)。通过鼓励详细观察,把平凡变成探索之旅,《看/想/惊奇》梳理出了许多历史问题和联系:从玉米种植者和采摘者到民族植物学和烹饪史,从非裔美国人的劳动歌曲到印第安人的创造故事,从农业综合企业到制造业到乙醇(1)。一个月后,这篇文章的一位作者对一群K-12教师重复了同样的练习。他们注意到,玉米片和循序渐进的思考过程为从个人关系到有趣的问题再到调查提供了一种灵活的工具。研讨会结束后,一位老师决定让她的四年级学生来测试这个练习,给他们放大镜,帮助他们更详细地观察芯片。特蕾莎·罗宾斯说:“学生们提出的问题与我们2月份的同龄人提出的问题相同。”“我非常惊讶和自豪,他们使用更高层次的思维技能来提出这些问题。他们询问了参与种植玉米的家庭,品牌及其历史意义,生产玉米的工厂,使用的包装,以及许多其他问题。越来越多的教师正在寻找方法,通过让学生参与系统的历史探究过程来培养这些更高层次的技能和习惯(3)。为了帮助教师更深入地思考探究的动态,并在课堂上培养它,本文提出了一个理论探究框架,为历史思维提供了背景、目的和形式。我们将芭芭拉·斯特林现有的探究模型与我们自己的双重探究(DI)模型相结合,构建了这个框架。Stripling的模型关注的是学习者的探究过程,而DI模型从教师的角度捕捉探究,描述了教师作为学习者和教师作为教师的双重角色。为了让教师从我们的模式中获得实际的启发,我们提供了一些具体的例子,包括对即将到来的国家历史日主题的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Corn Chips to Garbology: The Dynamics of Historical Inquiry
What can corn chips teach us about history? Quite a bit, as participants learned at a History Education Clearinghouse workshop at the 2011 American Historical Association annual meeting. Upon arriving for the workshop, we found sandwich baggies filled with golden-brown chips on every seat. Historian Laurel Thatcher Ulrich and Harvard Project Zero director Shari Tishman used the chips as artifacts to lead the participants through a See/Think/Wonder exercise. They provided a thinking routine that provokes inquiry about artifacts—even the mundane corn chip—that is useful for learners of all ages (Figure 1). By encouraging detailed observation and turning the ordinary into a voyage of exploration, See/Think/ Wonder teases out many historical questions and connections: from corn planters and pickers to ethnobotany and the history of cooking, from African American work songs to Native American creation stories, from agribusiness to manufacturing to ethanol (1). A month later, one of the authors of this article repeated the same exercise with a cohort of K–12 teachers. They noted how corn chips and the step-by-step thinking process provide a flexible vehicle for moving from personal connections through intriguing questions to investigation. After that workshop, one of the teachers decided to test the exercise with her fourth graders, giving them magnifying glasses to help them inspect the chips in greater detail. “Students came up with the same questions that our cohort came up with back in February,” Teresa Robbins reported. “I was so surprised and proud that they used higher order thinking skills to formulate these questions. They asked about the families that were involved in growing the corn, the brand and its historical significance, the factory that it was produced at, the packaging that was used, and many other questions” (2). As the corn chip story illustrates, a growing number of teachers are finding ways to cultivate these higher order skills and habits by engaging their students in a systematic process of historical inquiry (3). To help teachers think more deeply about the dynamics of inquiry and to foster it in their classrooms, this article presents a theoretical inquiry framework that provides context, purpose, and shape to historical thinking. We construct this framework by combining Barbara Stripling’s existing model of inquiry with our own Dual Inquiry (DI) model. Whereas Stripling’s model focuses on the learner’s inquiry process, the DI model captures inquiry from the teacher’s perspective, describing the dual roles of teacher-as-learner and teacher-as-teacher. With the aim of enabling teachers to draw practical inspiration from our model, we have provided a number of concrete illustrations, including applications to the upcoming year’s theme for National History Day.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信