{"title":"总线网格上的遗忘路由算法","authors":"K. Iwama, Eiji Miyano","doi":"10.1109/IPPS.1997.580986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An optimal [1.5N/sup 1/2/] lower bound is shown for oblivious routing on the mesh of buses, a two-dimensional parallel model consisting of N/sup 1/2//spl times/N/sup 1/2/ processors, N/sup 1/2/ row and N/sup 1/2/ column buses but no local connections between neighbouring processors. Many lower bound proofs for routing on mesh-structured models use a single instance (adversary) which includes difficult packet-movement. This approach does not work in our case; our proof is the first which exploits the fact that the routing algorithm has to cope with many different instances. Note that the two-dimensional mesh of buses includes 2N/sup 1/2/ buses and each processor can access two different buses. Apparently the three-dimensional model provides more communication facilities, namely, including 3N/sup 2/3/ buses and each processor can access three different buses. Surprisingly, however, the oblivious routing on the three-dimensional mesh of buses needs more time, i.e., /spl Omega/(N/sup 2/3/) steps, which is another important result of this paper.","PeriodicalId":145892,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 11th International Parallel Processing Symposium","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oblivious routing algorithms on the mesh of buses\",\"authors\":\"K. Iwama, Eiji Miyano\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPPS.1997.580986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An optimal [1.5N/sup 1/2/] lower bound is shown for oblivious routing on the mesh of buses, a two-dimensional parallel model consisting of N/sup 1/2//spl times/N/sup 1/2/ processors, N/sup 1/2/ row and N/sup 1/2/ column buses but no local connections between neighbouring processors. Many lower bound proofs for routing on mesh-structured models use a single instance (adversary) which includes difficult packet-movement. This approach does not work in our case; our proof is the first which exploits the fact that the routing algorithm has to cope with many different instances. Note that the two-dimensional mesh of buses includes 2N/sup 1/2/ buses and each processor can access two different buses. Apparently the three-dimensional model provides more communication facilities, namely, including 3N/sup 2/3/ buses and each processor can access three different buses. Surprisingly, however, the oblivious routing on the three-dimensional mesh of buses needs more time, i.e., /spl Omega/(N/sup 2/3/) steps, which is another important result of this paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 11th International Parallel Processing Symposium\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 11th International Parallel Processing Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPPS.1997.580986\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 11th International Parallel Processing Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPPS.1997.580986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An optimal [1.5N/sup 1/2/] lower bound is shown for oblivious routing on the mesh of buses, a two-dimensional parallel model consisting of N/sup 1/2//spl times/N/sup 1/2/ processors, N/sup 1/2/ row and N/sup 1/2/ column buses but no local connections between neighbouring processors. Many lower bound proofs for routing on mesh-structured models use a single instance (adversary) which includes difficult packet-movement. This approach does not work in our case; our proof is the first which exploits the fact that the routing algorithm has to cope with many different instances. Note that the two-dimensional mesh of buses includes 2N/sup 1/2/ buses and each processor can access two different buses. Apparently the three-dimensional model provides more communication facilities, namely, including 3N/sup 2/3/ buses and each processor can access three different buses. Surprisingly, however, the oblivious routing on the three-dimensional mesh of buses needs more time, i.e., /spl Omega/(N/sup 2/3/) steps, which is another important result of this paper.