各州作为破产法第9章的守门人:联邦制、特别授权和保护市政经济健康

Michael S. Frost
{"title":"各州作为破产法第9章的守门人:联邦制、特别授权和保护市政经济健康","authors":"Michael S. Frost","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2390758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 9 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code provides relief exclusively to financially distressed state-based municipalities. Once a debtor municipality meets eligibility requirements however, Chapter 9 operates advantageously to debtors due to the constitutional protection of state sovereignty. Though Chapter 9 filings have historically been less frequent in comparison to other Code chapters, as Chapter 9 filing quantities and outstanding debt numbers continue to increase, the macro-level economic impact of these filings also continues to raise concerns. Eligibility for Chapter 9 access requires debtors to be \"specifically authorized\" by state law to access the federal bankruptcy system. Thus, each State operates as its own gatekeeper to Chapter 9. Because of this, States bear the responsibility of balancing the economic impact of municipal bankruptcy with the ultimate needs of individual municipalities to find relief from financial distress. This piece advances the idea that the optimal balance is found through States implementing statutory express authorization to Chapter 9 as well as an additional conditional authorization system based on the Political Model. Additionally, this piece provides a breakdown of how each of the 50 states handles the Chapter 9 specific authorization requirement as well as a comprehensive analysis of each Conditional Authorization system currently being implemented.","PeriodicalId":368113,"journal":{"name":"State & Local Government eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"States as Chapter 9 Bankruptcy Gatekeepers: Federalism, Specific Authorization, and Protection of Municipal Economic Health\",\"authors\":\"Michael S. Frost\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2390758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chapter 9 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code provides relief exclusively to financially distressed state-based municipalities. Once a debtor municipality meets eligibility requirements however, Chapter 9 operates advantageously to debtors due to the constitutional protection of state sovereignty. Though Chapter 9 filings have historically been less frequent in comparison to other Code chapters, as Chapter 9 filing quantities and outstanding debt numbers continue to increase, the macro-level economic impact of these filings also continues to raise concerns. Eligibility for Chapter 9 access requires debtors to be \\\"specifically authorized\\\" by state law to access the federal bankruptcy system. Thus, each State operates as its own gatekeeper to Chapter 9. Because of this, States bear the responsibility of balancing the economic impact of municipal bankruptcy with the ultimate needs of individual municipalities to find relief from financial distress. This piece advances the idea that the optimal balance is found through States implementing statutory express authorization to Chapter 9 as well as an additional conditional authorization system based on the Political Model. Additionally, this piece provides a breakdown of how each of the 50 states handles the Chapter 9 specific authorization requirement as well as a comprehensive analysis of each Conditional Authorization system currently being implemented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":368113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"State & Local Government eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"State & Local Government eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2390758\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"State & Local Government eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2390758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

美国破产法第9章专门为财政困难的州级市政当局提供救济。然而,一旦债务人市政当局符合资格要求,由于宪法对国家主权的保护,第9章对债务人有利。尽管与法典其他章节相比,第9章的申请在历史上较少,但随着第9章的申请数量和未偿债务数量持续增加,这些申请的宏观经济影响也继续引起人们的关注。申请第九章破产保护的资格要求债务人获得州法律的“特别授权”,可以进入联邦破产保护系统。因此,每个国家都是第9章的自己的守门人。因此,国家有责任平衡城市破产的经济影响和个别城市摆脱财政困境的最终需要。本文提出了一种观点,即通过各国实施第9章的法定明示授权以及基于政治模式的附加条件授权制度来实现最佳平衡。此外,本文还详细介绍了50个州如何处理第9章的具体授权要求,并对目前正在实施的每个条件授权系统进行了全面分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
States as Chapter 9 Bankruptcy Gatekeepers: Federalism, Specific Authorization, and Protection of Municipal Economic Health
Chapter 9 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code provides relief exclusively to financially distressed state-based municipalities. Once a debtor municipality meets eligibility requirements however, Chapter 9 operates advantageously to debtors due to the constitutional protection of state sovereignty. Though Chapter 9 filings have historically been less frequent in comparison to other Code chapters, as Chapter 9 filing quantities and outstanding debt numbers continue to increase, the macro-level economic impact of these filings also continues to raise concerns. Eligibility for Chapter 9 access requires debtors to be "specifically authorized" by state law to access the federal bankruptcy system. Thus, each State operates as its own gatekeeper to Chapter 9. Because of this, States bear the responsibility of balancing the economic impact of municipal bankruptcy with the ultimate needs of individual municipalities to find relief from financial distress. This piece advances the idea that the optimal balance is found through States implementing statutory express authorization to Chapter 9 as well as an additional conditional authorization system based on the Political Model. Additionally, this piece provides a breakdown of how each of the 50 states handles the Chapter 9 specific authorization requirement as well as a comprehensive analysis of each Conditional Authorization system currently being implemented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信