{"title":"阿肯色州狩猎和鱼类委员会诉美国(2012年12月4日):美国最高法院驳回了明线规则,认为至少在某些情况下,政府造成的临时洪水可能是可补偿的","authors":"A. Varcoe","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2189590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thus far in the October 2012 Term, the U.S. Supreme Court has decided to hear two cases presenting takings law issues. This brief report focuses on the first of these two cases, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United States, which was decided in December 2012. The question presented in Arkansas Game was whether government actions that temporarily result in flooding can amount to takings of private property that trigger the right to just compensation under the Fifth Amendment.","PeriodicalId":346805,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United States (Dec. 4, 2012): Rejecting Bright-Line Rule, U.S. Supreme Court Holds that Temporary Government-Caused Flooding May Be a Compensable Taking, at Least in Some Circumstances\",\"authors\":\"A. Varcoe\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2189590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thus far in the October 2012 Term, the U.S. Supreme Court has decided to hear two cases presenting takings law issues. This brief report focuses on the first of these two cases, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United States, which was decided in December 2012. The question presented in Arkansas Game was whether government actions that temporarily result in flooding can amount to takings of private property that trigger the right to just compensation under the Fifth Amendment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2189590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2189590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United States (Dec. 4, 2012): Rejecting Bright-Line Rule, U.S. Supreme Court Holds that Temporary Government-Caused Flooding May Be a Compensable Taking, at Least in Some Circumstances
Thus far in the October 2012 Term, the U.S. Supreme Court has decided to hear two cases presenting takings law issues. This brief report focuses on the first of these two cases, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United States, which was decided in December 2012. The question presented in Arkansas Game was whether government actions that temporarily result in flooding can amount to takings of private property that trigger the right to just compensation under the Fifth Amendment.