多语言学习者使用的学习策略

G. Krasowicz-Kupis, Mateusz Jan Dudka
{"title":"多语言学习者使用的学习策略","authors":"G. Krasowicz-Kupis, Mateusz Jan Dudka","doi":"10.17951/lrp.2023.42.1.101-121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The issue of learning effectiveness and the role of the learner in the whole process is still an interesting field of research. Among the competences of the future, the report Future of Skills. Employment in 2030 mentions the active acquisition of knowledge and its meaningful use including the use of learning strategies. Research Aim: The aim of this text was to compare the language learning strategies used by multilingual and bilingual learners. Method: Sixty individuals participated in our study. The adapted Language Learning Strategies Inventory (SILL) translated by E. Olejarczuk and the Cattell’s Culture Neutral Test of Fluid Intelligence (CFT-20-R) were used to control the intellectual level. Results: The obtained results prove that there are statistically significant differences between bilingual and multilingual groups in the use of language learning strategies. The level of fluid intelligence does not differentiate the groups. Conclusion: The research problem presented in this text can provide heuristics for further research in the area related to language learning and its psychological determinants.","PeriodicalId":258263,"journal":{"name":"Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning Strategies Used by Multilingual Learners\",\"authors\":\"G. Krasowicz-Kupis, Mateusz Jan Dudka\",\"doi\":\"10.17951/lrp.2023.42.1.101-121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The issue of learning effectiveness and the role of the learner in the whole process is still an interesting field of research. Among the competences of the future, the report Future of Skills. Employment in 2030 mentions the active acquisition of knowledge and its meaningful use including the use of learning strategies. Research Aim: The aim of this text was to compare the language learning strategies used by multilingual and bilingual learners. Method: Sixty individuals participated in our study. The adapted Language Learning Strategies Inventory (SILL) translated by E. Olejarczuk and the Cattell’s Culture Neutral Test of Fluid Intelligence (CFT-20-R) were used to control the intellectual level. Results: The obtained results prove that there are statistically significant differences between bilingual and multilingual groups in the use of language learning strategies. The level of fluid intelligence does not differentiate the groups. Conclusion: The research problem presented in this text can provide heuristics for further research in the area related to language learning and its psychological determinants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":258263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17951/lrp.2023.42.1.101-121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17951/lrp.2023.42.1.101-121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学习有效性和学习者在整个过程中的作用问题仍然是一个有趣的研究领域。在未来的能力中,报告《未来技能》。2030年的就业提到积极获取知识并有意义地使用知识,包括使用学习策略。研究目的:本文的目的是比较多语学习者和双语学习者使用的语言学习策略。方法:60人参加了我们的研究。采用e.o Olejarczuk翻译的适应性语言学习策略量表(SILL)和卡特尔的流体智力文化中性测验(CFT-20-R)来控制智力水平。结果:所得结果证明,双语和多语群体在语言学习策略的使用上存在统计学上的显著差异。流动智力的水平并不能区分不同的群体。结论:本文提出的研究问题可以为语言学习及其心理决定因素的进一步研究提供启发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning Strategies Used by Multilingual Learners
Introduction: The issue of learning effectiveness and the role of the learner in the whole process is still an interesting field of research. Among the competences of the future, the report Future of Skills. Employment in 2030 mentions the active acquisition of knowledge and its meaningful use including the use of learning strategies. Research Aim: The aim of this text was to compare the language learning strategies used by multilingual and bilingual learners. Method: Sixty individuals participated in our study. The adapted Language Learning Strategies Inventory (SILL) translated by E. Olejarczuk and the Cattell’s Culture Neutral Test of Fluid Intelligence (CFT-20-R) were used to control the intellectual level. Results: The obtained results prove that there are statistically significant differences between bilingual and multilingual groups in the use of language learning strategies. The level of fluid intelligence does not differentiate the groups. Conclusion: The research problem presented in this text can provide heuristics for further research in the area related to language learning and its psychological determinants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信