开普敦大学学术咨询系统的概念和早期实施

Ermien van Pletzen, Riashna Sithaldeen, Danielle L. Fontaine-Rainen, Megan Bam, Carmelita Lee Shong, Deepti Charitar, Simphiwe Dlulani, Juanitill Sebothoma, Dimakatso Sebothoma
{"title":"开普敦大学学术咨询系统的概念和早期实施","authors":"Ermien van Pletzen, Riashna Sithaldeen, Danielle L. Fontaine-Rainen, Megan Bam, Carmelita Lee Shong, Deepti Charitar, Simphiwe Dlulani, Juanitill Sebothoma, Dimakatso Sebothoma","doi":"10.24085/jsaa.v9i2.3688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academic advising is a High-Impact Practice that supports better outcomes for all students, particularly those encountering structural barriers to success. This paper presents a case study of processes followed in a three-year project (2018–20) at the University of Cape Town (UCT) to conceptualise, design, and start implementing an academic advising system. Three goals were formulated:\n\nto develop conceptual capacity and a theory of academic advising;\nto develop an academic advising model responsive to institutional context and student need; and\nto develop structures, relationships, tools, and resources to implement a coherent system.\nAn informed grounded theory approach was used to analyse baseline data of existing support and advising at the institution. Data was collected through document and desktop research, interviews with stakeholders,\nand student focus groups. A monitoring and evaluation framework was developed to track and reflect on progress against the goals. Iterative cycles of data collection, analysis, and reflection took place as implementation started. A key finding was that UCT’s advising structures incline towards a decentralised faculty-based model, complemented by centralised support services that encompass advising functions. Low levels of integration were found, as well as inefficient duplication of services. To address these challenges, the conceptual and operational capacity of the academic advising team needed to be advanced. This was done by assembling a multidisciplinary team, undergoing professional training, and by running a journal club. A promising theoretical approach that emerged was a capability approach to academic advising. A shared model of academic advising was found to be best suited to the institutional context and a three-tiered model operationalised by faculty, professional, and peer advisers, as well as by automated advising tools, was designed. Implementation started through pilot projects. During Covid-19, innovative concept and centralised systems development that connected students to institutional resources, enabling them to practise agency and supporting their ability to achieve despite unprecedented structural barriers, demonstrated the viability of the capability approach adopted for steering further development of the system.","PeriodicalId":336239,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Students Affairs in Africa","volume":"2375 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptualisation and Early Implementation of an Academic Advising System at the University of Cape Town\",\"authors\":\"Ermien van Pletzen, Riashna Sithaldeen, Danielle L. Fontaine-Rainen, Megan Bam, Carmelita Lee Shong, Deepti Charitar, Simphiwe Dlulani, Juanitill Sebothoma, Dimakatso Sebothoma\",\"doi\":\"10.24085/jsaa.v9i2.3688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Academic advising is a High-Impact Practice that supports better outcomes for all students, particularly those encountering structural barriers to success. This paper presents a case study of processes followed in a three-year project (2018–20) at the University of Cape Town (UCT) to conceptualise, design, and start implementing an academic advising system. Three goals were formulated:\\n\\nto develop conceptual capacity and a theory of academic advising;\\nto develop an academic advising model responsive to institutional context and student need; and\\nto develop structures, relationships, tools, and resources to implement a coherent system.\\nAn informed grounded theory approach was used to analyse baseline data of existing support and advising at the institution. Data was collected through document and desktop research, interviews with stakeholders,\\nand student focus groups. A monitoring and evaluation framework was developed to track and reflect on progress against the goals. Iterative cycles of data collection, analysis, and reflection took place as implementation started. A key finding was that UCT’s advising structures incline towards a decentralised faculty-based model, complemented by centralised support services that encompass advising functions. Low levels of integration were found, as well as inefficient duplication of services. To address these challenges, the conceptual and operational capacity of the academic advising team needed to be advanced. This was done by assembling a multidisciplinary team, undergoing professional training, and by running a journal club. A promising theoretical approach that emerged was a capability approach to academic advising. A shared model of academic advising was found to be best suited to the institutional context and a three-tiered model operationalised by faculty, professional, and peer advisers, as well as by automated advising tools, was designed. Implementation started through pilot projects. During Covid-19, innovative concept and centralised systems development that connected students to institutional resources, enabling them to practise agency and supporting their ability to achieve despite unprecedented structural barriers, demonstrated the viability of the capability approach adopted for steering further development of the system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":336239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Students Affairs in Africa\",\"volume\":\"2375 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Students Affairs in Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24085/jsaa.v9i2.3688\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Students Affairs in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24085/jsaa.v9i2.3688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

学术咨询是一种高影响力的实践,可以为所有学生提供更好的结果,特别是那些遇到结构性障碍的学生。本文介绍了开普敦大学(UCT)一个为期三年的项目(2018 - 2020)所遵循的过程的案例研究,该项目旨在概念化、设计和开始实施一个学术咨询系统。制定了三个目标:发展概念能力和学术指导理论;开发一种适应院校背景和学生需求的学术指导模式;并开发结构、关系、工具和资源来实现一个连贯的系统。我们采用了一种有根据的理论方法来分析该机构现有支持和建议的基线数据。数据是通过文件和桌面研究、与利益相关者的访谈和学生焦点小组收集的。制定了监测和评价框架,以跟踪和反映目标的进展情况。数据收集、分析和反映的迭代周期在实现开始时发生。一个重要的发现是,UCT的咨询结构倾向于以分散的教师为基础的模式,辅以包括咨询功能的集中支持服务。发现了低水平的整合,以及低效的服务重复。为了应对这些挑战,需要提高学术咨询小组的概念和业务能力。这是通过组建一个多学科团队、接受专业培训和经营一个期刊俱乐部来实现的。出现了一种很有前途的理论方法,即学术咨询的能力方法。研究发现,一个共享的学术咨询模式最适合该机构的背景,并设计了一个由教师、专业人士和同行顾问以及自动化咨询工具操作的三层模型。通过试点项目开始实施。在2019冠状病毒病期间,创新概念和集中系统开发将学生与机构资源联系起来,使他们能够实践代理,并支持他们在前所未有的结构性障碍下取得成就的能力,这表明了指导系统进一步发展所采用的能力方法的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conceptualisation and Early Implementation of an Academic Advising System at the University of Cape Town
Academic advising is a High-Impact Practice that supports better outcomes for all students, particularly those encountering structural barriers to success. This paper presents a case study of processes followed in a three-year project (2018–20) at the University of Cape Town (UCT) to conceptualise, design, and start implementing an academic advising system. Three goals were formulated: to develop conceptual capacity and a theory of academic advising; to develop an academic advising model responsive to institutional context and student need; and to develop structures, relationships, tools, and resources to implement a coherent system. An informed grounded theory approach was used to analyse baseline data of existing support and advising at the institution. Data was collected through document and desktop research, interviews with stakeholders, and student focus groups. A monitoring and evaluation framework was developed to track and reflect on progress against the goals. Iterative cycles of data collection, analysis, and reflection took place as implementation started. A key finding was that UCT’s advising structures incline towards a decentralised faculty-based model, complemented by centralised support services that encompass advising functions. Low levels of integration were found, as well as inefficient duplication of services. To address these challenges, the conceptual and operational capacity of the academic advising team needed to be advanced. This was done by assembling a multidisciplinary team, undergoing professional training, and by running a journal club. A promising theoretical approach that emerged was a capability approach to academic advising. A shared model of academic advising was found to be best suited to the institutional context and a three-tiered model operationalised by faculty, professional, and peer advisers, as well as by automated advising tools, was designed. Implementation started through pilot projects. During Covid-19, innovative concept and centralised systems development that connected students to institutional resources, enabling them to practise agency and supporting their ability to achieve despite unprecedented structural barriers, demonstrated the viability of the capability approach adopted for steering further development of the system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信