利用教科书词汇、作业与实际计画评估程式设计入门课程的实用性

Kazuki Fukushima, T. Ishio, Kazumasa Shimari, Kenichi Matsumoto
{"title":"利用教科书词汇、作业与实际计画评估程式设计入门课程的实用性","authors":"Kazuki Fukushima, T. Ishio, Kazumasa Shimari, Kenichi Matsumoto","doi":"10.1109/CSEET58097.2023.00046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an assignment-based introductory programming course, a teacher makes a daily class plan based on a textbook and assigns tasks to the students. Assignments are prepared by the teacher so that students can have a better understanding of programming language constructs explained in the course. On the other hand, it is unclear how those language constructs are useful for practical programming tasks. To analyze the practicality of a programming course, this study proposes to compare the vocabularies of code used in textbooks, assignments, and regular programming tasks. If the vocabularies of the textbooks and assignments are closer to that of source code in actual projects, the programming course is considered more practical. As a case study, we have applied the method to evaluate a programming course focusing on data science for graduate students. The result revealed inconsistency between the programming language constructs taught in the course and frequently used in data analysis programs on the Kaggle platform.","PeriodicalId":256885,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE 35th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Assessment of Practicality of Introductory Programming Course Using Vocabulary of Textbooks, Assignments, and Actual Projects\",\"authors\":\"Kazuki Fukushima, T. Ishio, Kazumasa Shimari, Kenichi Matsumoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSEET58097.2023.00046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In an assignment-based introductory programming course, a teacher makes a daily class plan based on a textbook and assigns tasks to the students. Assignments are prepared by the teacher so that students can have a better understanding of programming language constructs explained in the course. On the other hand, it is unclear how those language constructs are useful for practical programming tasks. To analyze the practicality of a programming course, this study proposes to compare the vocabularies of code used in textbooks, assignments, and regular programming tasks. If the vocabularies of the textbooks and assignments are closer to that of source code in actual projects, the programming course is considered more practical. As a case study, we have applied the method to evaluate a programming course focusing on data science for graduate students. The result revealed inconsistency between the programming language constructs taught in the course and frequently used in data analysis programs on the Kaggle platform.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE 35th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE 35th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET58097.2023.00046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE 35th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET58097.2023.00046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在以作业为基础的编程入门课程中,教师根据教科书制定每日课程计划,并向学生分配任务。作业是由老师准备的,以便学生能更好地理解课程中解释的编程语言结构。另一方面,还不清楚这些语言结构对实际编程任务有何用处。为了分析编程课程的实用性,本研究建议比较教科书、作业和常规编程任务中使用的代码词汇表。如果教科书和作业中的词汇表更接近实际项目中的源代码,则认为编程课程更实用。作为一个案例研究,我们应用该方法来评估一门面向研究生的以数据科学为重点的编程课程。结果显示,课程中教授的编程语言结构与Kaggle平台上数据分析程序中经常使用的编程语言结构不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards Assessment of Practicality of Introductory Programming Course Using Vocabulary of Textbooks, Assignments, and Actual Projects
In an assignment-based introductory programming course, a teacher makes a daily class plan based on a textbook and assigns tasks to the students. Assignments are prepared by the teacher so that students can have a better understanding of programming language constructs explained in the course. On the other hand, it is unclear how those language constructs are useful for practical programming tasks. To analyze the practicality of a programming course, this study proposes to compare the vocabularies of code used in textbooks, assignments, and regular programming tasks. If the vocabularies of the textbooks and assignments are closer to that of source code in actual projects, the programming course is considered more practical. As a case study, we have applied the method to evaluate a programming course focusing on data science for graduate students. The result revealed inconsistency between the programming language constructs taught in the course and frequently used in data analysis programs on the Kaggle platform.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信