挑战初任教师对贫困对教育成就的影响的误解在英格兰的初级教师教育计划

Ian Thompson
{"title":"挑战初任教师对贫困对教育成就的影响的误解在英格兰的初级教师教育计划","authors":"Ian Thompson","doi":"10.4324/9781315109268-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence from both empirical research studies and statistical analyses has repeatedly shown that the most economically disadvantaged students have the poorest educational outcomes in England Consecutive governments in the United Kingdom have expressed concerns over both ‘social mobility’ and the failure to educate the poor and most disadvantaged in society. However, the policy response in England, the only UK jurisdiction where education remains the concern of the central government, has been to combine a neoliberal policy of diversification in types of school and compensatory reforms aimed at disadvantaged students with a neo-conservative drive towards a more traditional curriculum and more rigorous testing (Burn & Childs, 2016). At the same time, the government discourse that has often blamed schools and teachers and exhorted schools to do more without providing the necessary resources has only increased the pressure on disadvantaged children. Moves by the current government to supposedly increase social mobility through more selective state schools is likely to exacerbate inequality (Andrews, Hutchinson & Johnes, 2016).","PeriodicalId":224835,"journal":{"name":"Resisting Educational Inequality","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenging beginning teachers’ misconceptions of the effects of poverty on educational attainment in an initial teacher education programme in England\",\"authors\":\"Ian Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315109268-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evidence from both empirical research studies and statistical analyses has repeatedly shown that the most economically disadvantaged students have the poorest educational outcomes in England Consecutive governments in the United Kingdom have expressed concerns over both ‘social mobility’ and the failure to educate the poor and most disadvantaged in society. However, the policy response in England, the only UK jurisdiction where education remains the concern of the central government, has been to combine a neoliberal policy of diversification in types of school and compensatory reforms aimed at disadvantaged students with a neo-conservative drive towards a more traditional curriculum and more rigorous testing (Burn & Childs, 2016). At the same time, the government discourse that has often blamed schools and teachers and exhorted schools to do more without providing the necessary resources has only increased the pressure on disadvantaged children. Moves by the current government to supposedly increase social mobility through more selective state schools is likely to exacerbate inequality (Andrews, Hutchinson & Johnes, 2016).\",\"PeriodicalId\":224835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resisting Educational Inequality\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resisting Educational Inequality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315109268-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resisting Educational Inequality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315109268-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

来自实证研究和统计分析的证据一再表明,在英格兰,经济条件最差的学生的教育成果最差。英国历届政府都对“社会流动性”和对贫困和社会最弱势群体的教育失败表示担忧。然而,作为英国唯一一个教育仍然是中央政府关注的司法管辖区,英格兰的政策反应是将学校类型多样化的新自由主义政策和针对弱势学生的补偿性改革与新保守主义的推动结合起来,以实现更传统的课程和更严格的测试(Burn & kids, 2016)。与此同时,政府经常指责学校和教师,并劝告学校在没有提供必要资源的情况下做得更多,这只会增加弱势儿童的压力。现任政府通过选择性更强的公立学校增加社会流动性的举措可能会加剧不平等(Andrews, Hutchinson & Johnes, 2016)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenging beginning teachers’ misconceptions of the effects of poverty on educational attainment in an initial teacher education programme in England
Evidence from both empirical research studies and statistical analyses has repeatedly shown that the most economically disadvantaged students have the poorest educational outcomes in England Consecutive governments in the United Kingdom have expressed concerns over both ‘social mobility’ and the failure to educate the poor and most disadvantaged in society. However, the policy response in England, the only UK jurisdiction where education remains the concern of the central government, has been to combine a neoliberal policy of diversification in types of school and compensatory reforms aimed at disadvantaged students with a neo-conservative drive towards a more traditional curriculum and more rigorous testing (Burn & Childs, 2016). At the same time, the government discourse that has often blamed schools and teachers and exhorted schools to do more without providing the necessary resources has only increased the pressure on disadvantaged children. Moves by the current government to supposedly increase social mobility through more selective state schools is likely to exacerbate inequality (Andrews, Hutchinson & Johnes, 2016).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信