胃内气球之旅从过去到今天,未来展望

M. Rezvani
{"title":"胃内气球之旅从过去到今天,未来展望","authors":"M. Rezvani","doi":"10.5812/MINSURGERY.62031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the overweight and obesity are the significant public health concern and rises globally; scientist, surgeons, bariatrician and pharmacists are in a serious attempt to treat this syndrome by different way of approach. New medication and occasional devices are coming on board and introduced to this field. According to Noah Yuval Hariri “A Brief History of Tomorrow” in 2012 about 56 million people passed away throughout the entire world; 620,000 of them died because of human violence (war killed 120,000 people, and crime killed another 500,000). In contrast, 800,000 committed suicides happened and 1.5 million died of diabetes. He concludes that Sugar and obesity in follow is more dangerous than gun power (1). Although intra gastric balloon is not a new device in the world, it was introduced to the United States for weight loss purpose relatively in a recent time. DeBakey’s review in 1938 showed that bezoars led to weight loss (2). Free floating intragastric balloons were used by Neiben and Harboe in 1982 (3). In 1985 the Garren-Edwards Bubble was introduced as the first food and drug administration (FDA)approved device, but the approval was withdrawn seven years later because of its accompanied complication (4). Analysis of its problems led to recommendations for noninvasive design. While numbers of further developed devices were used outside of the United States, mostly in Europe and South America, the FDA did not approve any new devices until 2015 (4). The device is intended to be used in patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 to 40 kg/m. (5). Since intra gastric balloon became available to bariatric surgeons in the United States, over 5000 patients have been done and the number of surgery is increasing. Currently there are three FDA approved balloons in the USA. Studies have suggested that fluid is superior to air for distending gastric balloons. Inflated balloons reduce the operative volume capacity of the stomach. While the typical gastric volume is about 900 mL, an inflated balloon may take up most of the space, about 700 (+/100) mL (6). Initial side effects of the balloon are common and may consist of nausea, vomiting, reflux, and stomach cramps. Other side effects or complications could be indigestion, bloating, flatulence, and diarrhea. Rare side effects include esophagitis, gastric ulcer formation, or gastric perforation (7). The device could become deflated and slip into the lower intestines. Migration of a balloon could lead to bowel obstruction and potentially perforation (8). Gastric balloons are generally considered to be safe and effective in the short run. There could be procedurerelated side effects due to endoscopy and anesthesia. Rarely, the endoscopic placement of a balloon could lead to death. According to The US FDA there are five reports of unanticipated deaths that occurred from 2016 to the present in patients who received a liquid-filled intragastric balloon to treat obesity. Four reports involve the orbera intragastric balloon system (Apollo Endosurgery) and one report involves the ReShape integrated dual balloon system (ReShape Medical). All five patients died within 1 month or less of balloon placement. Three patients died 1 to 3 days after the balloon was placed. Today’s safety alert has been sent to healthcare providers for close monitoring of patients with liquid-filled intragastric balloon systems used to treat obesity. Since then, both companies have revised their product labeling to address these risks, per FDA recommendation (9). Nowadays, the FDA continues to recommend that healthcare providers closely monitor patients treated with these devices for complications and report any adverse events related to intragastric balloon systems through","PeriodicalId":158928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Journey of Intragastric Balloon from Past to Today, Future Perspective\",\"authors\":\"M. Rezvani\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/MINSURGERY.62031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the overweight and obesity are the significant public health concern and rises globally; scientist, surgeons, bariatrician and pharmacists are in a serious attempt to treat this syndrome by different way of approach. New medication and occasional devices are coming on board and introduced to this field. According to Noah Yuval Hariri “A Brief History of Tomorrow” in 2012 about 56 million people passed away throughout the entire world; 620,000 of them died because of human violence (war killed 120,000 people, and crime killed another 500,000). In contrast, 800,000 committed suicides happened and 1.5 million died of diabetes. He concludes that Sugar and obesity in follow is more dangerous than gun power (1). Although intra gastric balloon is not a new device in the world, it was introduced to the United States for weight loss purpose relatively in a recent time. DeBakey’s review in 1938 showed that bezoars led to weight loss (2). Free floating intragastric balloons were used by Neiben and Harboe in 1982 (3). In 1985 the Garren-Edwards Bubble was introduced as the first food and drug administration (FDA)approved device, but the approval was withdrawn seven years later because of its accompanied complication (4). Analysis of its problems led to recommendations for noninvasive design. While numbers of further developed devices were used outside of the United States, mostly in Europe and South America, the FDA did not approve any new devices until 2015 (4). The device is intended to be used in patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 to 40 kg/m. (5). Since intra gastric balloon became available to bariatric surgeons in the United States, over 5000 patients have been done and the number of surgery is increasing. Currently there are three FDA approved balloons in the USA. Studies have suggested that fluid is superior to air for distending gastric balloons. Inflated balloons reduce the operative volume capacity of the stomach. While the typical gastric volume is about 900 mL, an inflated balloon may take up most of the space, about 700 (+/100) mL (6). Initial side effects of the balloon are common and may consist of nausea, vomiting, reflux, and stomach cramps. Other side effects or complications could be indigestion, bloating, flatulence, and diarrhea. Rare side effects include esophagitis, gastric ulcer formation, or gastric perforation (7). The device could become deflated and slip into the lower intestines. Migration of a balloon could lead to bowel obstruction and potentially perforation (8). Gastric balloons are generally considered to be safe and effective in the short run. There could be procedurerelated side effects due to endoscopy and anesthesia. Rarely, the endoscopic placement of a balloon could lead to death. According to The US FDA there are five reports of unanticipated deaths that occurred from 2016 to the present in patients who received a liquid-filled intragastric balloon to treat obesity. Four reports involve the orbera intragastric balloon system (Apollo Endosurgery) and one report involves the ReShape integrated dual balloon system (ReShape Medical). All five patients died within 1 month or less of balloon placement. Three patients died 1 to 3 days after the balloon was placed. Today’s safety alert has been sent to healthcare providers for close monitoring of patients with liquid-filled intragastric balloon systems used to treat obesity. Since then, both companies have revised their product labeling to address these risks, per FDA recommendation (9). Nowadays, the FDA continues to recommend that healthcare providers closely monitor patients treated with these devices for complications and report any adverse events related to intragastric balloon systems through\",\"PeriodicalId\":158928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/MINSURGERY.62031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/MINSURGERY.62031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于超重和肥胖是一个重大的公共卫生问题,并且在全球范围内呈上升趋势;科学家、外科医生、减肥专家和药剂师都在认真尝试用不同的方法来治疗这种综合征。新的药物和偶尔出现的设备正在进入这个领域。根据诺亚·尤瓦尔·哈里里(Noah Yuval Hariri)的《明日简史》(A Brief History of Tomorrow), 2012年全世界约有5600万人去世;其中62万人死于人类暴力(战争导致12万人死亡,犯罪导致50万人死亡)。相比之下,有80万人自杀,150万人死于糖尿病。他的结论是,糖和肥胖在随访中比枪的威力更危险(1)。虽然胃内气囊在世界上并不是一种新设备,但在美国,它是最近才被引入到减肥目的的。DeBakey在1938年的综述表明,牛粪可以减轻体重(2)。Neiben和Harboe在1982年使用了自由漂浮的胃内气球(3)。1985年,Garren-Edwards气泡作为第一个获得美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的设备被引入,但由于其伴随的并发症,该批准在7年后被撤回(4)。对其问题的分析导致了对无创设计的建议。虽然许多进一步开发的设备在美国以外的地区使用,主要是在欧洲和南美,但FDA直到2015年才批准任何新设备(4)。该设备旨在用于体重指数(BMI)为30至40 kg/m的患者。(5)自从胃内球囊术在美国应用于减肥外科医生以来,已经有超过5000名患者接受了这种手术,而且手术的数量还在增加。目前,美国有三种经FDA批准的气球。研究表明,液体比空气更适合扩张胃球囊。膨胀的气球会减少胃的手术容量。典型的胃容量约为900 mL,充气球囊可能占据大部分空间,约700 (+/100)mL(6)。球囊最初的副作用很常见,可能包括恶心、呕吐、反流和胃痉挛。其他副作用或并发症可能是消化不良、腹胀、胀气和腹泻。罕见的副作用包括食管炎、胃溃疡形成或胃穿孔(7)。该装置可能会变瘪并滑入下肠。球囊的移动可能导致肠梗阻和潜在穿孔(8)。一般认为胃球囊在短期内是安全有效的。由于内窥镜检查和麻醉,可能会有手术相关的副作用。在内窥镜下放置气球很少会导致死亡。根据美国食品和药物管理局的数据,从2016年到现在,有5例接受充液胃内球囊治疗肥胖的患者意外死亡的报告。四份报告涉及orbera胃内球囊系统(Apollo Endosurgery),一份报告涉及重塑集成双球囊系统(重塑医学)。5例患者均在球囊放置后1个月内死亡。3例患者在气囊放置后1 ~ 3天死亡。今天的安全警报已发送给医疗保健提供者,以密切监测使用充液胃内球囊系统治疗肥胖的患者。从那时起,两家公司都根据FDA的建议修改了他们的产品标签,以解决这些风险(9)。如今,FDA继续建议医疗保健提供者密切监测使用这些设备治疗的患者的并发症,并通过胃内气囊系统报告任何不良事件
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Journey of Intragastric Balloon from Past to Today, Future Perspective
As the overweight and obesity are the significant public health concern and rises globally; scientist, surgeons, bariatrician and pharmacists are in a serious attempt to treat this syndrome by different way of approach. New medication and occasional devices are coming on board and introduced to this field. According to Noah Yuval Hariri “A Brief History of Tomorrow” in 2012 about 56 million people passed away throughout the entire world; 620,000 of them died because of human violence (war killed 120,000 people, and crime killed another 500,000). In contrast, 800,000 committed suicides happened and 1.5 million died of diabetes. He concludes that Sugar and obesity in follow is more dangerous than gun power (1). Although intra gastric balloon is not a new device in the world, it was introduced to the United States for weight loss purpose relatively in a recent time. DeBakey’s review in 1938 showed that bezoars led to weight loss (2). Free floating intragastric balloons were used by Neiben and Harboe in 1982 (3). In 1985 the Garren-Edwards Bubble was introduced as the first food and drug administration (FDA)approved device, but the approval was withdrawn seven years later because of its accompanied complication (4). Analysis of its problems led to recommendations for noninvasive design. While numbers of further developed devices were used outside of the United States, mostly in Europe and South America, the FDA did not approve any new devices until 2015 (4). The device is intended to be used in patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 to 40 kg/m. (5). Since intra gastric balloon became available to bariatric surgeons in the United States, over 5000 patients have been done and the number of surgery is increasing. Currently there are three FDA approved balloons in the USA. Studies have suggested that fluid is superior to air for distending gastric balloons. Inflated balloons reduce the operative volume capacity of the stomach. While the typical gastric volume is about 900 mL, an inflated balloon may take up most of the space, about 700 (+/100) mL (6). Initial side effects of the balloon are common and may consist of nausea, vomiting, reflux, and stomach cramps. Other side effects or complications could be indigestion, bloating, flatulence, and diarrhea. Rare side effects include esophagitis, gastric ulcer formation, or gastric perforation (7). The device could become deflated and slip into the lower intestines. Migration of a balloon could lead to bowel obstruction and potentially perforation (8). Gastric balloons are generally considered to be safe and effective in the short run. There could be procedurerelated side effects due to endoscopy and anesthesia. Rarely, the endoscopic placement of a balloon could lead to death. According to The US FDA there are five reports of unanticipated deaths that occurred from 2016 to the present in patients who received a liquid-filled intragastric balloon to treat obesity. Four reports involve the orbera intragastric balloon system (Apollo Endosurgery) and one report involves the ReShape integrated dual balloon system (ReShape Medical). All five patients died within 1 month or less of balloon placement. Three patients died 1 to 3 days after the balloon was placed. Today’s safety alert has been sent to healthcare providers for close monitoring of patients with liquid-filled intragastric balloon systems used to treat obesity. Since then, both companies have revised their product labeling to address these risks, per FDA recommendation (9). Nowadays, the FDA continues to recommend that healthcare providers closely monitor patients treated with these devices for complications and report any adverse events related to intragastric balloon systems through
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信