高管薪酬的经济、道德和动机标准:最新发展

L. Vitulano, S. J. Hannafey
{"title":"高管薪酬的经济、道德和动机标准:最新发展","authors":"L. Vitulano, S. J. Hannafey","doi":"10.2174/1874761200903020067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent economic developments have renewed societal debate about executive compensation practices in business organizations. This study explores economic, moral, and motivational criteria in decisions about how to best compensate executives in organizations. The essay devotes particular attention to new developments in this controversial debate. The authors propose that managerial work implies a kind of fiduciary trust necessary for the proper functioning of business activity and argue that executive compensation decisions and levels should be based on objective criteria.","PeriodicalId":352758,"journal":{"name":"The Open Ethics Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic, Moral, and Motivational Criteria of Executive Compensation: Recent Developments\",\"authors\":\"L. Vitulano, S. J. Hannafey\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874761200903020067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent economic developments have renewed societal debate about executive compensation practices in business organizations. This study explores economic, moral, and motivational criteria in decisions about how to best compensate executives in organizations. The essay devotes particular attention to new developments in this controversial debate. The authors propose that managerial work implies a kind of fiduciary trust necessary for the proper functioning of business activity and argue that executive compensation decisions and levels should be based on objective criteria.\",\"PeriodicalId\":352758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Ethics Journal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Ethics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874761200903020067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Ethics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874761200903020067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

最近的经济发展重新引发了关于商业组织高管薪酬做法的社会辩论。本研究探讨了经济、道德和激励标准在决定如何最好地补偿组织中的高管。这篇文章特别关注了这场有争议的辩论的新进展。作者提出,管理工作意味着一种商业活动正常运作所必需的受托信任,并认为高管薪酬决策和水平应基于客观标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic, Moral, and Motivational Criteria of Executive Compensation: Recent Developments
Recent economic developments have renewed societal debate about executive compensation practices in business organizations. This study explores economic, moral, and motivational criteria in decisions about how to best compensate executives in organizations. The essay devotes particular attention to new developments in this controversial debate. The authors propose that managerial work implies a kind of fiduciary trust necessary for the proper functioning of business activity and argue that executive compensation decisions and levels should be based on objective criteria.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信