益生菌、益生元和共生干预在糖尿病患者护理中的益处和风险

G. Adams
{"title":"益生菌、益生元和共生干预在糖尿病患者护理中的益处和风险","authors":"G. Adams","doi":"10.46715/IJDE2021.02.1000110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics are thought to affect the pathophysiology of diabetes mellitus including gut dysbiosis, intestinal barrier permeability and modulator of gut-brain axis and oxidative stress. This systematic review examined if their interventions resulted in improved clinical outcomes and were safe to administer. Methods: An electronic search was conducted in August 2020 of CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PUBMED databases as well as using Google Scholar using keyword searches combined in a formal search strategy. The studies extracted were then filtered through an inclusion and exclusion criteria and assessed for risk of bias. Results: Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria, with 20 studies involving participants with type 2 diabetes, 1 study a mixed cohort of type 1 and 2, and 3 involving prediabetes participants. Meta-analysis was not appropriate due to the heterogeneity in populations, methods and presented results. One trial was limited due to unclear risk of bias and was excluded. Four key themes were identified across the studies: improvements to glycaemic control; improvements in oxidative stress, inflammation and gut permeability; lipid profile, anthropometric parameters and blood pressure; and adverse events and tolerability. Conclusions: Probiotics improved glycaemic control, oxidative stress, inflammation and gut permeability and lipid profile in T2DM participants. There was no evidence of improvements to T1DM due to lack of studies and insufficient studies on pre-diabetes. Synbiotics are also promising but prebiotics have insufficient evidence.","PeriodicalId":341642,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Digital Evidence","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Benefits and Risks of Probiotic, Prebiotic and Symbiotic interventions in the Care of patients with Diabetes Mellitus\",\"authors\":\"G. Adams\",\"doi\":\"10.46715/IJDE2021.02.1000110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics are thought to affect the pathophysiology of diabetes mellitus including gut dysbiosis, intestinal barrier permeability and modulator of gut-brain axis and oxidative stress. This systematic review examined if their interventions resulted in improved clinical outcomes and were safe to administer. Methods: An electronic search was conducted in August 2020 of CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PUBMED databases as well as using Google Scholar using keyword searches combined in a formal search strategy. The studies extracted were then filtered through an inclusion and exclusion criteria and assessed for risk of bias. Results: Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria, with 20 studies involving participants with type 2 diabetes, 1 study a mixed cohort of type 1 and 2, and 3 involving prediabetes participants. Meta-analysis was not appropriate due to the heterogeneity in populations, methods and presented results. One trial was limited due to unclear risk of bias and was excluded. Four key themes were identified across the studies: improvements to glycaemic control; improvements in oxidative stress, inflammation and gut permeability; lipid profile, anthropometric parameters and blood pressure; and adverse events and tolerability. Conclusions: Probiotics improved glycaemic control, oxidative stress, inflammation and gut permeability and lipid profile in T2DM participants. There was no evidence of improvements to T1DM due to lack of studies and insufficient studies on pre-diabetes. Synbiotics are also promising but prebiotics have insufficient evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Digital Evidence\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Digital Evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46715/IJDE2021.02.1000110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Digital Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46715/IJDE2021.02.1000110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

益生菌、益生元和合成菌被认为影响糖尿病的病理生理,包括肠道生态失调、肠屏障通透性、肠脑轴调节剂和氧化应激。本系统综述检查了他们的干预措施是否改善了临床结果,是否安全。方法:于2020年8月对CINAHL、EMBASE、MEDLINE和PUBMED数据库以及Google Scholar进行电子检索,采用关键词搜索结合正式搜索策略进行检索。然后通过纳入和排除标准对提取的研究进行筛选,并评估偏倚风险。结果:24项研究符合纳入标准,其中20项研究涉及2型糖尿病患者,1项研究涉及1型和2型混合队列,3项研究涉及前驱糖尿病患者。由于人群、方法和结果的异质性,meta分析不合适。一项试验因不明确的偏倚风险而受到限制并被排除。研究确定了四个关键主题:改善血糖控制;改善氧化应激、炎症和肠道通透性;血脂、人体测量参数和血压;不良反应和耐受性。结论:益生菌可改善T2DM患者的血糖控制、氧化应激、炎症、肠道通透性和脂质状况。由于缺乏对糖尿病前期的研究和研究不足,没有证据表明T1DM有改善。合成菌也很有前景,但益生元证据不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Benefits and Risks of Probiotic, Prebiotic and Symbiotic interventions in the Care of patients with Diabetes Mellitus
Introduction: Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics are thought to affect the pathophysiology of diabetes mellitus including gut dysbiosis, intestinal barrier permeability and modulator of gut-brain axis and oxidative stress. This systematic review examined if their interventions resulted in improved clinical outcomes and were safe to administer. Methods: An electronic search was conducted in August 2020 of CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PUBMED databases as well as using Google Scholar using keyword searches combined in a formal search strategy. The studies extracted were then filtered through an inclusion and exclusion criteria and assessed for risk of bias. Results: Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria, with 20 studies involving participants with type 2 diabetes, 1 study a mixed cohort of type 1 and 2, and 3 involving prediabetes participants. Meta-analysis was not appropriate due to the heterogeneity in populations, methods and presented results. One trial was limited due to unclear risk of bias and was excluded. Four key themes were identified across the studies: improvements to glycaemic control; improvements in oxidative stress, inflammation and gut permeability; lipid profile, anthropometric parameters and blood pressure; and adverse events and tolerability. Conclusions: Probiotics improved glycaemic control, oxidative stress, inflammation and gut permeability and lipid profile in T2DM participants. There was no evidence of improvements to T1DM due to lack of studies and insufficient studies on pre-diabetes. Synbiotics are also promising but prebiotics have insufficient evidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信