爱尔兰结构性改革的政治:主导增长联盟、国内商业精英和内部贬值

Neil Dooley
{"title":"爱尔兰结构性改革的政治:主导增长联盟、国内商业精英和内部贬值","authors":"Neil Dooley","doi":"10.1177/10245294231194694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper broadens the scope of the Growth Model (GM) research agenda beyond the study of ‘core’ business elites by investigating the influence of (oft-neglected) non-core business actors and sectoral interests in determining growth strategies. To do so it looks at a crucial case in the GM debate: Ireland. Ireland’s robust recovery from the eurozone crisis has set it apart from the rest of the eurozone periphery. For GM scholarship, Ireland’s recovery has been driven by its long-established multinational/export sector, which is relatively indifferent to the effects of austerity and internal devaluation. Why, then, was internal devaluation a central plank of Ireland’s crisis response and Economic Adjustment Programme (EAP)? Drawing on 10 original interviews with Irish business elites and policy makers and documentary evidence, this paper shows that domestic, not multinational, business elites played a key role in framing conditionality related to competitiveness and labour market reform in the Irish EAP. This challenges the concept of ‘dominant growth coalitions’ and argues that an exclusive focus on ‘core’ business elites neglects the ability of other fractions of business power to determine growth strategies. Looking beyond ‘core’ business elites makes it possible to identify transformation behind more obvious patterns of continuity.","PeriodicalId":207354,"journal":{"name":"Competition & Change","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The politics of structural reform in Ireland: Dominant growth coalitions, domestic business elites, and internal devaluation\",\"authors\":\"Neil Dooley\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10245294231194694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper broadens the scope of the Growth Model (GM) research agenda beyond the study of ‘core’ business elites by investigating the influence of (oft-neglected) non-core business actors and sectoral interests in determining growth strategies. To do so it looks at a crucial case in the GM debate: Ireland. Ireland’s robust recovery from the eurozone crisis has set it apart from the rest of the eurozone periphery. For GM scholarship, Ireland’s recovery has been driven by its long-established multinational/export sector, which is relatively indifferent to the effects of austerity and internal devaluation. Why, then, was internal devaluation a central plank of Ireland’s crisis response and Economic Adjustment Programme (EAP)? Drawing on 10 original interviews with Irish business elites and policy makers and documentary evidence, this paper shows that domestic, not multinational, business elites played a key role in framing conditionality related to competitiveness and labour market reform in the Irish EAP. This challenges the concept of ‘dominant growth coalitions’ and argues that an exclusive focus on ‘core’ business elites neglects the ability of other fractions of business power to determine growth strategies. Looking beyond ‘core’ business elites makes it possible to identify transformation behind more obvious patterns of continuity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":207354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Competition & Change\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Competition & Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294231194694\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competition & Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294231194694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过调查(经常被忽视的)非核心商业行为者和部门利益在确定增长战略中的影响,拓宽了增长模型(GM)研究议程的范围,超出了对“核心”商业精英的研究。为了做到这一点,它着眼于通用汽车辩论中的一个关键案例:爱尔兰。爱尔兰从欧元区危机中强劲复苏,使其有别于欧元区其他外围国家。对于通用汽车学者来说,爱尔兰的复苏是由其历史悠久的跨国/出口部门推动的,该部门对紧缩政策和内部贬值的影响相对漠不关心。那么,为什么内部贬值是爱尔兰危机应对和经济调整计划(EAP)的核心内容呢?根据对爱尔兰商业精英和政策制定者的10次原始采访和文献证据,本文表明,在爱尔兰EAP中,国内(而非跨国)商业精英在制定与竞争力和劳动力市场改革相关的条件方面发挥了关键作用。这挑战了“主导增长联盟”的概念,并认为对“核心”商业精英的独家关注忽视了其他商业力量决定增长战略的能力。超越“核心”商业精英的视角,可以发现更明显的连续性模式背后的转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The politics of structural reform in Ireland: Dominant growth coalitions, domestic business elites, and internal devaluation
This paper broadens the scope of the Growth Model (GM) research agenda beyond the study of ‘core’ business elites by investigating the influence of (oft-neglected) non-core business actors and sectoral interests in determining growth strategies. To do so it looks at a crucial case in the GM debate: Ireland. Ireland’s robust recovery from the eurozone crisis has set it apart from the rest of the eurozone periphery. For GM scholarship, Ireland’s recovery has been driven by its long-established multinational/export sector, which is relatively indifferent to the effects of austerity and internal devaluation. Why, then, was internal devaluation a central plank of Ireland’s crisis response and Economic Adjustment Programme (EAP)? Drawing on 10 original interviews with Irish business elites and policy makers and documentary evidence, this paper shows that domestic, not multinational, business elites played a key role in framing conditionality related to competitiveness and labour market reform in the Irish EAP. This challenges the concept of ‘dominant growth coalitions’ and argues that an exclusive focus on ‘core’ business elites neglects the ability of other fractions of business power to determine growth strategies. Looking beyond ‘core’ business elites makes it possible to identify transformation behind more obvious patterns of continuity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信