根据土地法，土地使用权的合法性作为土地使用权的证据

International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Pub Date : 2023-06-27 DOI:10.54443/ijerlas.v3i5.998

Sahati, Gunawan Djajaputra, Gunawan Sahati, Djajaputra

{"title":"根据土地法，土地使用权的合法性作为土地使用权的证据","authors":"Sahati, Gunawan Djajaputra, Gunawan Sahati, Djajaputra","doi":"10.54443/ijerlas.v3i5.998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grondkaart or block maps are documents that prove the ownership of assets which are wealth for an institution or company that must be maintained. There are several things that are still being debated regarding the position or legality of Grondkaart itself. One state company that still uses Grondkaart as proof of ownership of its land assets is PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) or PT. KAI. Land assets PT. KAI is a legacy of the Dutch railroad company which was subject to nationalization, the land often causes disputes due to evidence of land tenure in the form of Grondkaart which is not regulated in Law Number 5 of 1960 and Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997. The formulation of the problem in this article is (1) What is the position of Grondkaart as a basis for rights or evidence of land tenure according to Indonesian Agrarian Law? (2) How is the legal protection and legal certainty of Grondkaart as proof of land ownership by PT KAI so that it can provide a solution to land problems for the residents of Miji Mojokerto? The research method used in this article is the normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual and case approaches. The technique used in the analysis of legal material is to use grammatical interpretation and systematic interpretation. The results showed that Grondkaart's position was not regulated in Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Regulations and Government Regulation No. 10 of 1960 Jo. Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration, this has resulted in that Grondkaart is not a strong proof of ownership of railway land, but can be used as a basis for ownership or as the basis for PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) to register their land in order to obtain a strong Certificate of Land Rights. Grondkaart is proof of PT KAI's land ownership which if in the process of securing assets a dispute occurs it can be used as proof of ownership where rights have never been renewed.","PeriodicalId":386989,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GRONDKAART LEGALITY AS EVIDENCE OF LAND TENURE RIGHTS BY PT. KAI ACCORDING TO AGRARIAN LAW\",\"authors\":\"Sahati, Gunawan Djajaputra, Gunawan Sahati, Djajaputra\",\"doi\":\"10.54443/ijerlas.v3i5.998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Grondkaart or block maps are documents that prove the ownership of assets which are wealth for an institution or company that must be maintained. There are several things that are still being debated regarding the position or legality of Grondkaart itself. One state company that still uses Grondkaart as proof of ownership of its land assets is PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) or PT. KAI. Land assets PT. KAI is a legacy of the Dutch railroad company which was subject to nationalization, the land often causes disputes due to evidence of land tenure in the form of Grondkaart which is not regulated in Law Number 5 of 1960 and Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997. The formulation of the problem in this article is (1) What is the position of Grondkaart as a basis for rights or evidence of land tenure according to Indonesian Agrarian Law? (2) How is the legal protection and legal certainty of Grondkaart as proof of land ownership by PT KAI so that it can provide a solution to land problems for the residents of Miji Mojokerto? The research method used in this article is the normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual and case approaches. The technique used in the analysis of legal material is to use grammatical interpretation and systematic interpretation. The results showed that Grondkaart's position was not regulated in Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Regulations and Government Regulation No. 10 of 1960 Jo. Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration, this has resulted in that Grondkaart is not a strong proof of ownership of railway land, but can be used as a basis for ownership or as the basis for PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) to register their land in order to obtain a strong Certificate of Land Rights. Grondkaart is proof of PT KAI's land ownership which if in the process of securing assets a dispute occurs it can be used as proof of ownership where rights have never been renewed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":386989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54443/ijerlas.v3i5.998\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54443/ijerlas.v3i5.998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

Grondkaart或块图是证明资产所有权的文件，这些资产是机构或公司必须维护的财富。关于《Grondkaart》本身的地位或合法性，仍有一些问题有待讨论。印尼国有企业PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero)或PT. KAI仍在使用Grondkaart作为其土地资产所有权证明。土地资产PT. KAI是荷兰铁路公司的遗产，该公司被国有化，土地经常引起争议，因为土地所有权的证据以Grondkaart的形式存在，这在1960年第5号法律和1997年第24号政府法规中没有规定。本文中问题的表述是:(1)根据印度尼西亚土地法，Grondkaart作为土地所有权的权利基础或证据的地位是什么?(2) PT KAI对Grondkaart作为土地所有权证明的法律保护和法律确定性如何，从而为Miji Mojokerto居民提供解决土地问题的方案?本文采用的研究方法是规范法研究方法，包括成文法、概念法和案例法。在分析法律材料时使用的技术是使用语法解释和系统解释。结果表明，Grondkaart的地位没有在1960年《基本农业条例》第5号法和1960年《政府条例》第10号中得到规定。1997年关于土地登记的第24号政府条例，这导致Grondkaart不是铁路土地所有权的有力证明，但可以作为所有权的基础，也可以作为PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero)注册其土地的基础，以获得强有力的土地权利证书。Grondkaart是PT KAI土地所有权的证明，如果在确保资产的过程中发生争议，它可以用作从未更新权利的所有权证明。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

GRONDKAART LEGALITY AS EVIDENCE OF LAND TENURE RIGHTS BY PT. KAI ACCORDING TO AGRARIAN LAW

Grondkaart or block maps are documents that prove the ownership of assets which are wealth for an institution or company that must be maintained. There are several things that are still being debated regarding the position or legality of Grondkaart itself. One state company that still uses Grondkaart as proof of ownership of its land assets is PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) or PT. KAI. Land assets PT. KAI is a legacy of the Dutch railroad company which was subject to nationalization, the land often causes disputes due to evidence of land tenure in the form of Grondkaart which is not regulated in Law Number 5 of 1960 and Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997. The formulation of the problem in this article is (1) What is the position of Grondkaart as a basis for rights or evidence of land tenure according to Indonesian Agrarian Law? (2) How is the legal protection and legal certainty of Grondkaart as proof of land ownership by PT KAI so that it can provide a solution to land problems for the residents of Miji Mojokerto? The research method used in this article is the normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual and case approaches. The technique used in the analysis of legal material is to use grammatical interpretation and systematic interpretation. The results showed that Grondkaart's position was not regulated in Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Regulations and Government Regulation No. 10 of 1960 Jo. Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration, this has resulted in that Grondkaart is not a strong proof of ownership of railway land, but can be used as a basis for ownership or as the basis for PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) to register their land in order to obtain a strong Certificate of Land Rights. Grondkaart is proof of PT KAI's land ownership which if in the process of securing assets a dispute occurs it can be used as proof of ownership where rights have never been renewed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS)

自引率

0.00%

发文量