使用随机投影和主成分分析的机器学习分类器对降维fMRI数据的比较

Nur Farahana Mohd Suhaimi, Z. Htike
{"title":"使用随机投影和主成分分析的机器学习分类器对降维fMRI数据的比较","authors":"Nur Farahana Mohd Suhaimi, Z. Htike","doi":"10.1109/ICOM47790.2019.8952005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine learning has opened up the opportunity for understanding how the brain works. In this paper, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data are analyzed with reduced dimension. We have carried out a performance comparison of random projection (RP) and principal component analysis (PCA) with different number of components of fMRI data. In addition to that, six different types of machine learning algorithm have been used. In particular, the Haxby dataset is chosen for our experiment. The dataset comprises 9 classes for object recognition. 10-fold cross validation step has been employed. We have discovered that RP outperforms PCA when the former is paired with logistic regression, Gaussian Naive Bayes and linear support vector machine. The best pair for this study was found to be PCA and k-nearest neighbors. Nevertheless, each algorithm was found to have its own strengths for fMRI classification approach.","PeriodicalId":415914,"journal":{"name":"2019 7th International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering (ICOM)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for dimensionally reduced fMRI data using Random Projection and Principal Component Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Nur Farahana Mohd Suhaimi, Z. Htike\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICOM47790.2019.8952005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Machine learning has opened up the opportunity for understanding how the brain works. In this paper, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data are analyzed with reduced dimension. We have carried out a performance comparison of random projection (RP) and principal component analysis (PCA) with different number of components of fMRI data. In addition to that, six different types of machine learning algorithm have been used. In particular, the Haxby dataset is chosen for our experiment. The dataset comprises 9 classes for object recognition. 10-fold cross validation step has been employed. We have discovered that RP outperforms PCA when the former is paired with logistic regression, Gaussian Naive Bayes and linear support vector machine. The best pair for this study was found to be PCA and k-nearest neighbors. Nevertheless, each algorithm was found to have its own strengths for fMRI classification approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":415914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 7th International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering (ICOM)\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 7th International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering (ICOM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOM47790.2019.8952005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 7th International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering (ICOM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOM47790.2019.8952005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

机器学习为理解大脑的工作原理提供了机会。本文对功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据进行降维分析。我们比较了随机投影法(RP)和主成分分析法(PCA)对不同分量数量的fMRI数据的性能。除此之外,还使用了六种不同类型的机器学习算法。特别地,我们的实验选择了Haxby数据集。该数据集包括9个用于目标识别的类。采用10倍交叉验证步骤。我们发现,当RP与逻辑回归、高斯朴素贝叶斯和线性支持向量机配对时,RP的性能优于PCA。发现PCA和k近邻是本研究的最佳组合。尽管如此,我们发现每种算法在fMRI分类方法上都有自己的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for dimensionally reduced fMRI data using Random Projection and Principal Component Analysis
Machine learning has opened up the opportunity for understanding how the brain works. In this paper, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data are analyzed with reduced dimension. We have carried out a performance comparison of random projection (RP) and principal component analysis (PCA) with different number of components of fMRI data. In addition to that, six different types of machine learning algorithm have been used. In particular, the Haxby dataset is chosen for our experiment. The dataset comprises 9 classes for object recognition. 10-fold cross validation step has been employed. We have discovered that RP outperforms PCA when the former is paired with logistic regression, Gaussian Naive Bayes and linear support vector machine. The best pair for this study was found to be PCA and k-nearest neighbors. Nevertheless, each algorithm was found to have its own strengths for fMRI classification approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信