{"title":"企业财富与收入不平等","authors":"H. Khan, C. T. Shehzad, Atif Saeed Chaudry","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3718648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We show Patrimonial Capitalism at the meso-level; using a panel of 105,970 publicly listed firms from 83 countries for 2000–2019, we find a positive effect of corporate-capital/labor-income ratio on income inequality of the hosting country, arguably via the channel of classical corporate financing (Khan et al., 2020). This effect is robust against endogeneity of government expenditure and economic development, alternative measurement of income inequality, and sample restrictions to high-income economies, OECD-member countries, and the pre-global financial crisis period. The empirical evidence is pioneering in terms of its generalizability across economies, owing to the employment of a diverse panel of firms operating in countries from every region and income level, and addressing issues of temporal inconsistency, imputation, cross-country standardization, and underreporting prevalent in contemporary data on the personal distribution of income and wealth.","PeriodicalId":129815,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate Wealth and Income Inequality\",\"authors\":\"H. Khan, C. T. Shehzad, Atif Saeed Chaudry\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3718648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We show Patrimonial Capitalism at the meso-level; using a panel of 105,970 publicly listed firms from 83 countries for 2000–2019, we find a positive effect of corporate-capital/labor-income ratio on income inequality of the hosting country, arguably via the channel of classical corporate financing (Khan et al., 2020). This effect is robust against endogeneity of government expenditure and economic development, alternative measurement of income inequality, and sample restrictions to high-income economies, OECD-member countries, and the pre-global financial crisis period. The empirical evidence is pioneering in terms of its generalizability across economies, owing to the employment of a diverse panel of firms operating in countries from every region and income level, and addressing issues of temporal inconsistency, imputation, cross-country standardization, and underreporting prevalent in contemporary data on the personal distribution of income and wealth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3718648\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3718648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们在中观层面展示了世袭资本主义;通过对2000-2019年来自83个国家的105,970家上市公司的调查,我们发现企业资本/劳动收入比率对东道国的收入不平等有积极影响,可以说是通过经典的企业融资渠道(Khan et al., 2020)。这种效应在政府支出和经济发展的内生性、收入不平等的替代衡量标准以及高收入经济体、经合组织成员国和全球金融危机前时期的样本限制下都很强劲。由于采用了在各个地区和收入水平的国家开展业务的不同公司小组,并解决了关于个人收入和财富分配的当代数据中普遍存在的时间不一致、归因、跨国标准化和少报等问题,因此,经验证据在各经济体的普遍性方面具有开创性。
We show Patrimonial Capitalism at the meso-level; using a panel of 105,970 publicly listed firms from 83 countries for 2000–2019, we find a positive effect of corporate-capital/labor-income ratio on income inequality of the hosting country, arguably via the channel of classical corporate financing (Khan et al., 2020). This effect is robust against endogeneity of government expenditure and economic development, alternative measurement of income inequality, and sample restrictions to high-income economies, OECD-member countries, and the pre-global financial crisis period. The empirical evidence is pioneering in terms of its generalizability across economies, owing to the employment of a diverse panel of firms operating in countries from every region and income level, and addressing issues of temporal inconsistency, imputation, cross-country standardization, and underreporting prevalent in contemporary data on the personal distribution of income and wealth.