空气中铅颗粒大小对血铅的影响。

Dong-Uk Park, N. Paik
{"title":"空气中铅颗粒大小对血铅的影响。","authors":"Dong-Uk Park, N. Paik","doi":"10.1093/ANNHYG/MEF036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Worker exposure to airborne lead particles was evaluated for a total of 117 workers in 12 work-places of four different industrial types in Korea. The particle sizes were measured using 8-stage cascade impactors worn by the workers. Mass median aerodynamic diameters (MMAD) were determined by type of industry and percentage of lead particles as a fraction of airborne lead (PbA) concentration was determined by particle size. Blood lead (PbB) levels of workers who matched airborne lead samples were also examined. A Scheffé's pairwise comparison test showed that MMAD and the fractions of each of respirable particles and lead particles < or =1 microm relative to PbA varied greatly by the type of industry. The concentrations of lead particles < or =1 microm, which the Center for Policy Alternatives model assumes is relatively constant at 12.5 microg/m3, increased with increasing PbA concentration. In addition, a better correlation was detected between concentrations of particles < or =1 microm and concentrations of respirable lead particles (r = 0.82) than that between concentrations of small particles and PbA (r = 0.61). A simple linear regression indicated that PbB correlated better with respirable lead concentration (r2 = 0.35, P = 0.0001) than with PbA concentration and had a higher slope coefficient. Controlling for respirable lead concentration reduced the partial correlation coefficient between PbA concentration and PbB level from 0.56 to 0.20 (P = 0.053). The results indicate that the contribution of respirable lead particles to lead absorption would be greater than that of PbA. This study concludes that the measurement of PbA only may not properly reflect a worker's exposure to lead particles with diverse characteristics. For the evaluation of a worker's exposure to various types of lead particles, it is recommended that respirable lead particles as well as PbA be measured.","PeriodicalId":342592,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of occupational hygiene","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect on blood lead of airborne lead particles characterized by size.\",\"authors\":\"Dong-Uk Park, N. Paik\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ANNHYG/MEF036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Worker exposure to airborne lead particles was evaluated for a total of 117 workers in 12 work-places of four different industrial types in Korea. The particle sizes were measured using 8-stage cascade impactors worn by the workers. Mass median aerodynamic diameters (MMAD) were determined by type of industry and percentage of lead particles as a fraction of airborne lead (PbA) concentration was determined by particle size. Blood lead (PbB) levels of workers who matched airborne lead samples were also examined. A Scheffé's pairwise comparison test showed that MMAD and the fractions of each of respirable particles and lead particles < or =1 microm relative to PbA varied greatly by the type of industry. The concentrations of lead particles < or =1 microm, which the Center for Policy Alternatives model assumes is relatively constant at 12.5 microg/m3, increased with increasing PbA concentration. In addition, a better correlation was detected between concentrations of particles < or =1 microm and concentrations of respirable lead particles (r = 0.82) than that between concentrations of small particles and PbA (r = 0.61). A simple linear regression indicated that PbB correlated better with respirable lead concentration (r2 = 0.35, P = 0.0001) than with PbA concentration and had a higher slope coefficient. Controlling for respirable lead concentration reduced the partial correlation coefficient between PbA concentration and PbB level from 0.56 to 0.20 (P = 0.053). The results indicate that the contribution of respirable lead particles to lead absorption would be greater than that of PbA. This study concludes that the measurement of PbA only may not properly reflect a worker's exposure to lead particles with diverse characteristics. For the evaluation of a worker's exposure to various types of lead particles, it is recommended that respirable lead particles as well as PbA be measured.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Annals of occupational hygiene\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Annals of occupational hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ANNHYG/MEF036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of occupational hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ANNHYG/MEF036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

对韩国4个不同产业的12个工作场所的117名工人进行了空气中铅颗粒的暴露评估。颗粒大小是用工人佩戴的8级级级冲击器测量的。空气动力学质量中值直径(MMAD)由工业类型决定,铅颗粒占空气中铅(PbA)浓度的百分比由颗粒大小决定。与空气中铅样本相匹配的工人血铅(PbB)水平也被检查。scheff两两比较检验表明,MMAD、可吸入颗粒物和铅颗粒物相对于PbA <或=1微米的比例随工业类型的不同而有很大差异。政策选择中心模型假设<或=1微米的铅颗粒浓度相对稳定在12.5微克/立方米,随着PbA浓度的增加而增加。此外,<或=1微米颗粒浓度与可吸入铅颗粒浓度之间的相关性(r = 0.82)优于小颗粒浓度与PbA之间的相关性(r = 0.61)。简单线性回归表明,PbB与可吸入铅浓度的相关性较好(r2 = 0.35, P = 0.0001),且斜率系数较高。控制可吸入性铅浓度使PbA浓度与PbB水平的偏相关系数由0.56降至0.20 (P = 0.053)。结果表明,可吸入性铅颗粒对铅吸收的贡献大于PbA。本研究的结论是,仅测量PbA可能不能正确反映工人接触具有不同特征的铅颗粒的情况。为了评估工人接触各种类型的铅颗粒,建议测量可吸入的铅颗粒和PbA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect on blood lead of airborne lead particles characterized by size.
Worker exposure to airborne lead particles was evaluated for a total of 117 workers in 12 work-places of four different industrial types in Korea. The particle sizes were measured using 8-stage cascade impactors worn by the workers. Mass median aerodynamic diameters (MMAD) were determined by type of industry and percentage of lead particles as a fraction of airborne lead (PbA) concentration was determined by particle size. Blood lead (PbB) levels of workers who matched airborne lead samples were also examined. A Scheffé's pairwise comparison test showed that MMAD and the fractions of each of respirable particles and lead particles < or =1 microm relative to PbA varied greatly by the type of industry. The concentrations of lead particles < or =1 microm, which the Center for Policy Alternatives model assumes is relatively constant at 12.5 microg/m3, increased with increasing PbA concentration. In addition, a better correlation was detected between concentrations of particles < or =1 microm and concentrations of respirable lead particles (r = 0.82) than that between concentrations of small particles and PbA (r = 0.61). A simple linear regression indicated that PbB correlated better with respirable lead concentration (r2 = 0.35, P = 0.0001) than with PbA concentration and had a higher slope coefficient. Controlling for respirable lead concentration reduced the partial correlation coefficient between PbA concentration and PbB level from 0.56 to 0.20 (P = 0.053). The results indicate that the contribution of respirable lead particles to lead absorption would be greater than that of PbA. This study concludes that the measurement of PbA only may not properly reflect a worker's exposure to lead particles with diverse characteristics. For the evaluation of a worker's exposure to various types of lead particles, it is recommended that respirable lead particles as well as PbA be measured.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信