SPECT重构分块迭代算法的性能评价

Chi Liu, L. Volokh, Xide Zhao, Jingyan Xu, Taek-Soo Lee, B. Tsui
{"title":"SPECT重构分块迭代算法的性能评价","authors":"Chi Liu, L. Volokh, Xide Zhao, Jingyan Xu, Taek-Soo Lee, B. Tsui","doi":"10.1109/NSSMIC.2005.1596676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of four block-iterative algorithms, ordered-subsets expectation-maximization (OS-EM), rescaled block-iterative EM (RBI-EM), modified row-action maximum likelihood algorithm (RAMLA) and rescaled block-iterative maximum a posteriori EM (RBI-MAP-EM), for In-111 ProstaScint/spl reg/ SPECT image reconstruction. The 3D NCAT phantom with realistic In-111 ProstaScint/spl reg/ activity distribution was used in the study. Noise-free and noisy projections of the phantom obtained using a medium-energy general-purpose (MEGP) collimator were generated using Monte Carlo simulation methods. For each algorithm, the projection data were reconstructed with the compensations for attenuation, collimator-detector response and scatter. Image quality was evaluated in terms of FWHM of a profile through a small blood vessel, normalized mean square error (NMSE), ensemble normalized standard deviation (NSDE) of a uniform region of interest (ROI) in the reconstructed image measured from 30 noise realizations, and regional NSD (NSDR) of an ROI measure from 1 noise realization. The results indicated that, RBI-EM has superior performance than that of OS-EM when less than 4 views per subset were used and similar performance when 4 or more views per subset were used. Modified RAMLA provides similar image quality with a slower convergence rate than that of OS-EM. Using well-chosen parameters, RBI-MAP-EM provides increased noise smoothing with less loss in resolution and error. We conclude that when compared with OS-EM, the RBI-EM and modified RAMLA have the same performance at a slower convergence rate, while the RBI-MAP-EM has superior performance and can potentially improve image quality.","PeriodicalId":105619,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of block-iterative algorithms for SPECT reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"Chi Liu, L. Volokh, Xide Zhao, Jingyan Xu, Taek-Soo Lee, B. Tsui\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NSSMIC.2005.1596676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of four block-iterative algorithms, ordered-subsets expectation-maximization (OS-EM), rescaled block-iterative EM (RBI-EM), modified row-action maximum likelihood algorithm (RAMLA) and rescaled block-iterative maximum a posteriori EM (RBI-MAP-EM), for In-111 ProstaScint/spl reg/ SPECT image reconstruction. The 3D NCAT phantom with realistic In-111 ProstaScint/spl reg/ activity distribution was used in the study. Noise-free and noisy projections of the phantom obtained using a medium-energy general-purpose (MEGP) collimator were generated using Monte Carlo simulation methods. For each algorithm, the projection data were reconstructed with the compensations for attenuation, collimator-detector response and scatter. Image quality was evaluated in terms of FWHM of a profile through a small blood vessel, normalized mean square error (NMSE), ensemble normalized standard deviation (NSDE) of a uniform region of interest (ROI) in the reconstructed image measured from 30 noise realizations, and regional NSD (NSDR) of an ROI measure from 1 noise realization. The results indicated that, RBI-EM has superior performance than that of OS-EM when less than 4 views per subset were used and similar performance when 4 or more views per subset were used. Modified RAMLA provides similar image quality with a slower convergence rate than that of OS-EM. Using well-chosen parameters, RBI-MAP-EM provides increased noise smoothing with less loss in resolution and error. We conclude that when compared with OS-EM, the RBI-EM and modified RAMLA have the same performance at a slower convergence rate, while the RBI-MAP-EM has superior performance and can potentially improve image quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":105619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2005.1596676\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2005.1596676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是评估四种块迭代算法的性能,有序子集期望最大化(OS-EM),重新缩放的块迭代EM (RBI-EM),改进的行动作最大似然算法(RAMLA)和重新缩放的块迭代最大后置EM (RBI-MAP-EM),用于In-111 ProstaScint/spl reg/ SPECT图像重建。采用具有真实in -111 ProstaScint/spl reg/ activity分布的三维NCAT假体。采用蒙特卡罗仿真方法生成了利用中能量通用准直器(MEGP)获得的无噪声和有噪声幻像投影。对于每种算法,对投影数据进行了重构,并对衰减、准直-检测器响应和散射进行了补偿。图像质量的评估包括:通过小血管的轮廓的FWHM、30个噪声实现测量的重建图像中的均匀感兴趣区域(ROI)的归一化均方误差(NMSE)、集合归一化标准差(NSDE)以及1个噪声实现测量的ROI的区域NSD (NSDR)。结果表明,当每个子集使用少于4个视图时,RBI-EM的性能优于OS-EM;当每个子集使用4个或更多视图时,RBI-EM的性能与OS-EM相似。改进的RAMLA可以提供与OS-EM相似的图像质量,但收敛速度比OS-EM慢。使用精心选择的参数,RBI-MAP-EM在分辨率和误差损失较小的情况下提供了更好的噪声平滑。我们得出结论,与OS-EM相比,RBI-EM和改进的RAMLA具有相同的性能,但收敛速度较慢,而RBI-MAP-EM具有更好的性能,并且可以潜在地提高图像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance evaluation of block-iterative algorithms for SPECT reconstruction
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of four block-iterative algorithms, ordered-subsets expectation-maximization (OS-EM), rescaled block-iterative EM (RBI-EM), modified row-action maximum likelihood algorithm (RAMLA) and rescaled block-iterative maximum a posteriori EM (RBI-MAP-EM), for In-111 ProstaScint/spl reg/ SPECT image reconstruction. The 3D NCAT phantom with realistic In-111 ProstaScint/spl reg/ activity distribution was used in the study. Noise-free and noisy projections of the phantom obtained using a medium-energy general-purpose (MEGP) collimator were generated using Monte Carlo simulation methods. For each algorithm, the projection data were reconstructed with the compensations for attenuation, collimator-detector response and scatter. Image quality was evaluated in terms of FWHM of a profile through a small blood vessel, normalized mean square error (NMSE), ensemble normalized standard deviation (NSDE) of a uniform region of interest (ROI) in the reconstructed image measured from 30 noise realizations, and regional NSD (NSDR) of an ROI measure from 1 noise realization. The results indicated that, RBI-EM has superior performance than that of OS-EM when less than 4 views per subset were used and similar performance when 4 or more views per subset were used. Modified RAMLA provides similar image quality with a slower convergence rate than that of OS-EM. Using well-chosen parameters, RBI-MAP-EM provides increased noise smoothing with less loss in resolution and error. We conclude that when compared with OS-EM, the RBI-EM and modified RAMLA have the same performance at a slower convergence rate, while the RBI-MAP-EM has superior performance and can potentially improve image quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信