{"title":"在国家安全黑洞附近投资","authors":"Ji Li","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2811968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multinational corporations dominate the global economy. Their aggressive business expansion has led to occasional conflicts with some sovereign governments’ core interests. The most irreconcilable one is probably between foreign direct investments by multinationals and the need of sovereign states to safeguard their national security. This article empirically explores the tension in its most manifested case, i.e. the reactions of China-based multinationals to the highly confidential national security review system of the United States, also known as the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) review. I find that, contrary to conventional wisdom, most Chinese investors know little about CFIUS and are content to remain ignorant. The majority of those who have some knowledge about it consider the process politicized and non-transparent. A minority reported to have abandoned contemplated investments in the United States due to concerns with CFIUS. Variations in the perception and the reactions of the China-based multinationals generally turn on their government ownership, sectoral sensitivity, and investment size. In addition, the recent landmark decision in Ralls v. CFIUS has a profound impact on the investors’ perception of the system, but has not altered their filing behavior. The findings make several important theoretical and policy contributions.","PeriodicalId":365224,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Investment (Topic)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investing Near the National Security Black Hole\",\"authors\":\"Ji Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2811968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multinational corporations dominate the global economy. Their aggressive business expansion has led to occasional conflicts with some sovereign governments’ core interests. The most irreconcilable one is probably between foreign direct investments by multinationals and the need of sovereign states to safeguard their national security. This article empirically explores the tension in its most manifested case, i.e. the reactions of China-based multinationals to the highly confidential national security review system of the United States, also known as the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) review. I find that, contrary to conventional wisdom, most Chinese investors know little about CFIUS and are content to remain ignorant. The majority of those who have some knowledge about it consider the process politicized and non-transparent. A minority reported to have abandoned contemplated investments in the United States due to concerns with CFIUS. Variations in the perception and the reactions of the China-based multinationals generally turn on their government ownership, sectoral sensitivity, and investment size. In addition, the recent landmark decision in Ralls v. CFIUS has a profound impact on the investors’ perception of the system, but has not altered their filing behavior. The findings make several important theoretical and policy contributions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Investment (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Investment (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2811968\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Investment (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2811968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
跨国公司主导着全球经济。它们积极的业务扩张导致偶尔与一些主权国家政府的核心利益发生冲突。最不可调和的可能是跨国公司的外国直接投资与主权国家维护国家安全的需要之间的矛盾。本文以最明显的案例,即中国跨国公司对美国高度保密的国家安全审查制度(也被称为美国外国投资委员会(CFIUS)审查)的反应,实证探讨了这种紧张关系。我发现,与传统观点相反,大多数中国投资者对CFIUS知之甚少,而且满足于保持无知。大多数对其有所了解的人认为这一过程政治化且不透明。据报道,少数公司出于对CFIUS的担忧而放弃了在美国的投资计划。在华跨国公司的看法和反应的不同,通常取决于它们的政府所有权、行业敏感性和投资规模。此外,最近在Ralls v. CFIUS中具有里程碑意义的判决对投资者对该制度的看法产生了深远的影响,但并未改变他们的申请行为。这些发现在理论和政策上做出了重要贡献。
Multinational corporations dominate the global economy. Their aggressive business expansion has led to occasional conflicts with some sovereign governments’ core interests. The most irreconcilable one is probably between foreign direct investments by multinationals and the need of sovereign states to safeguard their national security. This article empirically explores the tension in its most manifested case, i.e. the reactions of China-based multinationals to the highly confidential national security review system of the United States, also known as the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) review. I find that, contrary to conventional wisdom, most Chinese investors know little about CFIUS and are content to remain ignorant. The majority of those who have some knowledge about it consider the process politicized and non-transparent. A minority reported to have abandoned contemplated investments in the United States due to concerns with CFIUS. Variations in the perception and the reactions of the China-based multinationals generally turn on their government ownership, sectoral sensitivity, and investment size. In addition, the recent landmark decision in Ralls v. CFIUS has a profound impact on the investors’ perception of the system, but has not altered their filing behavior. The findings make several important theoretical and policy contributions.