{"title":"IFC向Shapefile转型的路径评估——BIM与GIS的整合","authors":"Junxiang Zhu, Peng Wang, Xiangyu Wang","doi":"10.1109/GEOINFORMATICS.2018.8557099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building Information Modelling (BIM) could provide detailed 3D building models to Geographic Information Systems (GISs) for the emerging studies in smart cities/digital cities. During information exchange, Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) containing rich building information is the most used data format in BIM. However, GIS does not the capacity to directly consume the data in IFC due to data incompatibility between the two systems. Consequently, IFC files have to be transformed into a format that is accessible to GIS. Shapefile is one of them, given its popularity in geospatial science. This study tests the different formats and methods for transforming IFC to shapefile, assesses their performance, in order to offer a ranking, from which better decisions could be made when choosing an appropriate intermediate data format. The results show direct transformation from IFC to shapefile retained the most geometry and semantic information. If the direct transformation method does not work in some cases, 3DS, VRML, or SKP could be used as alternatives to retain most of the information, while DWG, DXF, KML, and KMZ should not be considered due to their poor performance in the test.","PeriodicalId":142380,"journal":{"name":"2018 26th International Conference on Geoinformatics","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Assessment of Paths for Transforming IFC to Shapefile for Integration of BIM and GIS\",\"authors\":\"Junxiang Zhu, Peng Wang, Xiangyu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/GEOINFORMATICS.2018.8557099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Building Information Modelling (BIM) could provide detailed 3D building models to Geographic Information Systems (GISs) for the emerging studies in smart cities/digital cities. During information exchange, Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) containing rich building information is the most used data format in BIM. However, GIS does not the capacity to directly consume the data in IFC due to data incompatibility between the two systems. Consequently, IFC files have to be transformed into a format that is accessible to GIS. Shapefile is one of them, given its popularity in geospatial science. This study tests the different formats and methods for transforming IFC to shapefile, assesses their performance, in order to offer a ranking, from which better decisions could be made when choosing an appropriate intermediate data format. The results show direct transformation from IFC to shapefile retained the most geometry and semantic information. If the direct transformation method does not work in some cases, 3DS, VRML, or SKP could be used as alternatives to retain most of the information, while DWG, DXF, KML, and KMZ should not be considered due to their poor performance in the test.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 26th International Conference on Geoinformatics\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 26th International Conference on Geoinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/GEOINFORMATICS.2018.8557099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 26th International Conference on Geoinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GEOINFORMATICS.2018.8557099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
建筑信息模型(BIM)可以为地理信息系统(gis)提供详细的三维建筑模型,用于智能城市/数字城市的新兴研究。在信息交换过程中,包含丰富建筑信息的IFC (Industry Foundation Classes)是BIM中使用最多的数据格式。然而,由于两个系统之间的数据不兼容,GIS不具备直接使用IFC数据的能力。因此,国际金融公司的文件必须转换成地理信息系统可以使用的格式。Shapefile就是其中之一,因为它在地理空间科学中很受欢迎。本研究测试了将IFC转换为shapefile的不同格式和方法,评估了它们的性能,以便提供一个排名,以便在选择适当的中间数据格式时做出更好的决策。结果表明,从IFC到shapefile的直接转换保留了最多的几何和语义信息。如果直接转换方法在某些情况下不起作用,可以使用3DS, VRML或SKP作为替代方法来保留大部分信息,而DWG, DXF, KML和KMZ由于在测试中的性能较差而不应考虑。
An Assessment of Paths for Transforming IFC to Shapefile for Integration of BIM and GIS
Building Information Modelling (BIM) could provide detailed 3D building models to Geographic Information Systems (GISs) for the emerging studies in smart cities/digital cities. During information exchange, Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) containing rich building information is the most used data format in BIM. However, GIS does not the capacity to directly consume the data in IFC due to data incompatibility between the two systems. Consequently, IFC files have to be transformed into a format that is accessible to GIS. Shapefile is one of them, given its popularity in geospatial science. This study tests the different formats and methods for transforming IFC to shapefile, assesses their performance, in order to offer a ranking, from which better decisions could be made when choosing an appropriate intermediate data format. The results show direct transformation from IFC to shapefile retained the most geometry and semantic information. If the direct transformation method does not work in some cases, 3DS, VRML, or SKP could be used as alternatives to retain most of the information, while DWG, DXF, KML, and KMZ should not be considered due to their poor performance in the test.