在叙述者中,保守者伊本·哈德的许多话是对其近似修饰的著作与开放巴里的著作作比较比较。

Ziyad Salim Al-Abbadi
{"title":"在叙述者中,保守者伊本·哈德的许多话是对其近似修饰的著作与开放巴里的著作作比较比较。","authors":"Ziyad Salim Al-Abbadi","doi":"10.33102/jmqs.v14i2.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no doubt that Ibn Hajar is one of the notable scholars of Islam. He mastered the various field of knowledge. Thus, his reputation was well known by public and students. Among the sciences that he was outstanding in is the science of narrators. Whereby his commentary on most of the narrators of Prophet’s traditions was being found. But it has been observed that some of his commentaries on some of the narrators were contradicted in his several books. Some of them were judged as weak in a book and as trustworthy in the other. Therefore, this study tries to solve the problem by clarifying the contradiction by comparing to the other scholar’s commentaries on the narrators. A comparative study between his book Taqrib Tahdhib and Fath al-Bari thus be conducted to solve with the problem.","PeriodicalId":276672,"journal":{"name":"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah","volume":"218 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"تعدد أقوال الحافظ ابن حجر في الراوي دراسة مقارنة بين كتابيه تقريب التهذيب وفتح الباري\",\"authors\":\"Ziyad Salim Al-Abbadi\",\"doi\":\"10.33102/jmqs.v14i2.127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is no doubt that Ibn Hajar is one of the notable scholars of Islam. He mastered the various field of knowledge. Thus, his reputation was well known by public and students. Among the sciences that he was outstanding in is the science of narrators. Whereby his commentary on most of the narrators of Prophet’s traditions was being found. But it has been observed that some of his commentaries on some of the narrators were contradicted in his several books. Some of them were judged as weak in a book and as trustworthy in the other. Therefore, this study tries to solve the problem by clarifying the contradiction by comparing to the other scholar’s commentaries on the narrators. A comparative study between his book Taqrib Tahdhib and Fath al-Bari thus be conducted to solve with the problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":276672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah\",\"volume\":\"218 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v14i2.127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v14i2.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

毫无疑问,伊本·哈贾尔是伊斯兰教著名的学者之一。他精通各个领域的知识。因此,他的名声为公众和学生所熟知。在他所擅长的科学中,有一门是叙述者科学。由此,他对先知传统的大多数叙述者的评论被发现。但有人观察到,他对一些叙述者的一些评论在他的几本书中是相互矛盾的。他们中的一些人在一本书中被认为软弱,而在另一本书中被认为值得信赖。因此,本研究试图通过对比其他学者对叙述者的评论来澄清矛盾,从而解决问题。因此,对他的《Taqrib Tahdhib》和《Fath al-Bari》进行比较研究,以解决这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
تعدد أقوال الحافظ ابن حجر في الراوي دراسة مقارنة بين كتابيه تقريب التهذيب وفتح الباري
There is no doubt that Ibn Hajar is one of the notable scholars of Islam. He mastered the various field of knowledge. Thus, his reputation was well known by public and students. Among the sciences that he was outstanding in is the science of narrators. Whereby his commentary on most of the narrators of Prophet’s traditions was being found. But it has been observed that some of his commentaries on some of the narrators were contradicted in his several books. Some of them were judged as weak in a book and as trustworthy in the other. Therefore, this study tries to solve the problem by clarifying the contradiction by comparing to the other scholar’s commentaries on the narrators. A comparative study between his book Taqrib Tahdhib and Fath al-Bari thus be conducted to solve with the problem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信