乌克兰有权获得医疗护理的人

Yurii Prytyka, T. Nikitina
{"title":"乌克兰有权获得医疗护理的人","authors":"Yurii Prytyka, T. Nikitina","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.158.263078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Topicality. The relevance of the problem considered in the article is caused by the absence of the definition of the legal status of the participants in the relationships between the medical institution and the patient, as well as the object of this relationship, and the content of the “medical error” concept. \nThe purpose of the article. The aim of the article is to examine the legal status of the participants to the said relations (the medical professional and the patient), to determine the object of such legal relations and to define what constitutes the so-called “medical error”. \nResearch methods. The article provides a general overview of the legislation regulating the provision of medical services. The main features that characterize the person as a patient under the contract for the provision of medical services are determined. The practice of national courts is analyzed in the article in order to identify common problems with the application of legislation on compensation for damage caused by a “medical error”. Apart from that, the author focuses on the legal status of the parties to the agreement on the provision of medical services. \nResults. The provision of medical care and services is aimed at the preservation of human life and health, which benefits not only the interests of the patient himself and his family members, but also in the long run the interests of the state and society as a whole. The relations between the medical institution and the patient are governed first and foremost by the norms of civil law, which means that legal disputes arising out of these relations (e.g. if the patient is harmed due to his physician’s failure to exercise due care) are considered as civil cases. The findings propose to determine the legal status of the healthcare professional and the patient, as well as to ensure the mandatory professional representation of patients in cases of “medical errors”.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"2357 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Right оf а Person to Medical Care іn Ukraine\",\"authors\":\"Yurii Prytyka, T. Nikitina\",\"doi\":\"10.21564/2414-990x.158.263078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Topicality. The relevance of the problem considered in the article is caused by the absence of the definition of the legal status of the participants in the relationships between the medical institution and the patient, as well as the object of this relationship, and the content of the “medical error” concept. \\nThe purpose of the article. The aim of the article is to examine the legal status of the participants to the said relations (the medical professional and the patient), to determine the object of such legal relations and to define what constitutes the so-called “medical error”. \\nResearch methods. The article provides a general overview of the legislation regulating the provision of medical services. The main features that characterize the person as a patient under the contract for the provision of medical services are determined. The practice of national courts is analyzed in the article in order to identify common problems with the application of legislation on compensation for damage caused by a “medical error”. Apart from that, the author focuses on the legal status of the parties to the agreement on the provision of medical services. \\nResults. The provision of medical care and services is aimed at the preservation of human life and health, which benefits not only the interests of the patient himself and his family members, but also in the long run the interests of the state and society as a whole. The relations between the medical institution and the patient are governed first and foremost by the norms of civil law, which means that legal disputes arising out of these relations (e.g. if the patient is harmed due to his physician’s failure to exercise due care) are considered as civil cases. The findings propose to determine the legal status of the healthcare professional and the patient, as well as to ensure the mandatory professional representation of patients in cases of “medical errors”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":417369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problems of Legality\",\"volume\":\"2357 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problems of Legality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.158.263078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Legality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.158.263078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

时事性。该条所考虑的问题之所以具有相关性,是因为没有界定医疗机构与患者之间关系的参与者的法律地位以及这种关系的对象,也没有界定"医疗差错"概念的内容。文章的目的。该条的目的是审查上述关系的参与者(医务人员和病人)的法律地位,确定这种法律关系的对象,并界定什么构成所谓的"医疗错误"。研究方法。该条概述了管理提供医疗服务的立法。根据提供医疗服务的合同,确定了作为病人的人的主要特征。本文分析了国家法院的做法,以确定适用"医疗差错"造成损害赔偿立法的共同问题。除此之外,提交人还着重讨论了关于提供医疗服务的协议各方的法律地位。结果。提供医疗保健和服务的目的是维护人的生命和健康,这不仅有利于病人本人及其家属的利益,而且从长远来看也有利于国家和整个社会的利益。医疗机构与患者之间的关系首先受民法规范的管辖,这意味着由这些关系引起的法律纠纷(例如,如果患者因医生未能行使应有的照顾而受到伤害)被视为民事案件。调查结果建议确定保健专业人员和患者的法律地位,并确保在发生"医疗差错"的情况下,患者必须有专业代表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Right оf а Person to Medical Care іn Ukraine
Topicality. The relevance of the problem considered in the article is caused by the absence of the definition of the legal status of the participants in the relationships between the medical institution and the patient, as well as the object of this relationship, and the content of the “medical error” concept. The purpose of the article. The aim of the article is to examine the legal status of the participants to the said relations (the medical professional and the patient), to determine the object of such legal relations and to define what constitutes the so-called “medical error”. Research methods. The article provides a general overview of the legislation regulating the provision of medical services. The main features that characterize the person as a patient under the contract for the provision of medical services are determined. The practice of national courts is analyzed in the article in order to identify common problems with the application of legislation on compensation for damage caused by a “medical error”. Apart from that, the author focuses on the legal status of the parties to the agreement on the provision of medical services. Results. The provision of medical care and services is aimed at the preservation of human life and health, which benefits not only the interests of the patient himself and his family members, but also in the long run the interests of the state and society as a whole. The relations between the medical institution and the patient are governed first and foremost by the norms of civil law, which means that legal disputes arising out of these relations (e.g. if the patient is harmed due to his physician’s failure to exercise due care) are considered as civil cases. The findings propose to determine the legal status of the healthcare professional and the patient, as well as to ensure the mandatory professional representation of patients in cases of “medical errors”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信