{"title":"金融科技贷款机构在投资者之间公平分配贷款吗?市场借贷中的交换条件和监管审查","authors":"Liting Chiu, B. Wolfe, Woongsun Yoo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3281358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marketplace lending platforms select which investors will have the opportunity to fund loans. Platforms claim to fairly allocate loans between retail and institutional investors, but we provide evidence that contradicts this claim. Institutional investors are allocated loans with lower default rates after controlling for interest rates, consistent with a quid pro quo exchange for volume commitments. However, when regulators are most likely to monitor the platform, we find that institutional-investor favor wanes, and platforms redirect lower default rate loans to retail investors. The evidence suggests platforms adjust allocation behavior to avoid costly regulatory intervention.","PeriodicalId":123845,"journal":{"name":"Consumer Legal & Oversight eJournal","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do FinTech Lenders Fairly Allocate Loans Among Investors? Quid Pro Quo and Regulatory Scrutiny in Marketplace Lending\",\"authors\":\"Liting Chiu, B. Wolfe, Woongsun Yoo\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3281358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Marketplace lending platforms select which investors will have the opportunity to fund loans. Platforms claim to fairly allocate loans between retail and institutional investors, but we provide evidence that contradicts this claim. Institutional investors are allocated loans with lower default rates after controlling for interest rates, consistent with a quid pro quo exchange for volume commitments. However, when regulators are most likely to monitor the platform, we find that institutional-investor favor wanes, and platforms redirect lower default rate loans to retail investors. The evidence suggests platforms adjust allocation behavior to avoid costly regulatory intervention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Consumer Legal & Oversight eJournal\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Consumer Legal & Oversight eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3281358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consumer Legal & Oversight eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3281358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do FinTech Lenders Fairly Allocate Loans Among Investors? Quid Pro Quo and Regulatory Scrutiny in Marketplace Lending
Marketplace lending platforms select which investors will have the opportunity to fund loans. Platforms claim to fairly allocate loans between retail and institutional investors, but we provide evidence that contradicts this claim. Institutional investors are allocated loans with lower default rates after controlling for interest rates, consistent with a quid pro quo exchange for volume commitments. However, when regulators are most likely to monitor the platform, we find that institutional-investor favor wanes, and platforms redirect lower default rate loans to retail investors. The evidence suggests platforms adjust allocation behavior to avoid costly regulatory intervention.