审计师运作效率对审计师竞争的影响

8B - Audit Pub Date : 2014-12-15 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2538936
Ping Zhang, Ling Chu
{"title":"审计师运作效率对审计师竞争的影响","authors":"Ping Zhang, Ling Chu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2538936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses a model extended from DeAngelo (1981) to examine audit market and audit pricing. When auditors have differential operational efficiencies, the audit market becomes delicate. On one hand, auditees would like to reduce audit fees by to purchasing audit services from the most efficient auditors. On the other hand, the competition in the market can be significantly reduced when there are few auditors in a market. The auditees can end up paying the highest fees despite the auditors are very efficient. This paper concludes that auditees can minimize auditing fees by maintaining an optimal number of auditors in the market, including some less efficient auditors. The large auditees would have to pay more for they have fewer choices in a market than small auditees. In order to maintain reasonable competition among auditors in a market, auditees pay the more efficient auditors higher fees.","PeriodicalId":429430,"journal":{"name":"8B - Audit","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Implication of Auditor Operational Efficiency for Auditor Competition\",\"authors\":\"Ping Zhang, Ling Chu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2538936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper uses a model extended from DeAngelo (1981) to examine audit market and audit pricing. When auditors have differential operational efficiencies, the audit market becomes delicate. On one hand, auditees would like to reduce audit fees by to purchasing audit services from the most efficient auditors. On the other hand, the competition in the market can be significantly reduced when there are few auditors in a market. The auditees can end up paying the highest fees despite the auditors are very efficient. This paper concludes that auditees can minimize auditing fees by maintaining an optimal number of auditors in the market, including some less efficient auditors. The large auditees would have to pay more for they have fewer choices in a market than small auditees. In order to maintain reasonable competition among auditors in a market, auditees pay the more efficient auditors higher fees.\",\"PeriodicalId\":429430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"8B - Audit\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"8B - Audit\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2538936\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"8B - Audit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2538936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文采用DeAngelo(1981)的扩展模型来考察审计市场和审计定价。当审计师的运营效率存在差异时,审计市场就会变得微妙。一方面,被审计单位希望通过向最有效率的审计人员购买审计服务来减少审计费用。另一方面,当一个市场上的审计师很少时,市场上的竞争就会大大减少。尽管审计人员非常高效,但被审计方最终可能支付最高的费用。本文的结论是,被审计单位可以通过保持市场上审计师的最优数量(包括一些效率较低的审计师)来最小化审计费用。大型审计机构将不得不支付更多的费用,因为它们在市场上的选择比小型审计机构少。为了保持审计师之间在市场上的合理竞争,被审计单位向效率更高的审计师支付更高的费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Implication of Auditor Operational Efficiency for Auditor Competition
This paper uses a model extended from DeAngelo (1981) to examine audit market and audit pricing. When auditors have differential operational efficiencies, the audit market becomes delicate. On one hand, auditees would like to reduce audit fees by to purchasing audit services from the most efficient auditors. On the other hand, the competition in the market can be significantly reduced when there are few auditors in a market. The auditees can end up paying the highest fees despite the auditors are very efficient. This paper concludes that auditees can minimize auditing fees by maintaining an optimal number of auditors in the market, including some less efficient auditors. The large auditees would have to pay more for they have fewer choices in a market than small auditees. In order to maintain reasonable competition among auditors in a market, auditees pay the more efficient auditors higher fees.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信