小鼠树突棘形态计量学的类型特异性分析

E. Ceyhan, L. Fong, T. Tasky, M. Hurdal, M. Beg, M. Martone, J. Ratnanather
{"title":"小鼠树突棘形态计量学的类型特异性分析","authors":"E. Ceyhan, L. Fong, T. Tasky, M. Hurdal, M. Beg, M. Martone, J. Ratnanather","doi":"10.1109/ISPA.2007.4383655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we analyze the morphometric measures of dendrite spines of mice derived from electron tomography images for different spine types based on pre-assigned categories. The morphometric measures we consider include the metric distance, volume, surface area, and length of dendrite spines of mice. The question of interest is how these morphometric measures differ by condition of mice; and how the metric distance relates to volume, surface area, length, and condition of mice. The large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping algorithm is the tool we use to obtain the metric distances that quantize the morphometry of binary images of dendrite spines with respect to a template spine. We demonstrate that for the values not adjusted for scale metric distances and other morphometric measures are significantly different between the conditions. The morphometric measures (rather than the mice condition) explain almost all the variation in metric distances. Since size (or scale) dominates the other variables in variation, we adjust metric distances and other morphometric measures for scale. We demonstrate that the scaled metric distances and other scaled morphometric variables still differ for condition, and scaled metric distances depend most significantly on scaled morphometric measures. The methodology used is also valid for morphometric measures of other organs or tissues and metric distances other than LDDMM.","PeriodicalId":112420,"journal":{"name":"2007 5th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Type-Specific Analysis of Morphometry of Dendrite Spines of Mice\",\"authors\":\"E. Ceyhan, L. Fong, T. Tasky, M. Hurdal, M. Beg, M. Martone, J. Ratnanather\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISPA.2007.4383655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we analyze the morphometric measures of dendrite spines of mice derived from electron tomography images for different spine types based on pre-assigned categories. The morphometric measures we consider include the metric distance, volume, surface area, and length of dendrite spines of mice. The question of interest is how these morphometric measures differ by condition of mice; and how the metric distance relates to volume, surface area, length, and condition of mice. The large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping algorithm is the tool we use to obtain the metric distances that quantize the morphometry of binary images of dendrite spines with respect to a template spine. We demonstrate that for the values not adjusted for scale metric distances and other morphometric measures are significantly different between the conditions. The morphometric measures (rather than the mice condition) explain almost all the variation in metric distances. Since size (or scale) dominates the other variables in variation, we adjust metric distances and other morphometric measures for scale. We demonstrate that the scaled metric distances and other scaled morphometric variables still differ for condition, and scaled metric distances depend most significantly on scaled morphometric measures. The methodology used is also valid for morphometric measures of other organs or tissues and metric distances other than LDDMM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 5th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 5th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPA.2007.4383655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 5th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPA.2007.4383655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在这篇文章中,我们分析了基于预分配分类的不同脊柱类型的电子断层成像小鼠树突棘的形态计量学测量。我们考虑的形态计量测量包括小鼠树突棘的公制距离、体积、表面积和长度。令人感兴趣的问题是,这些形态测量方法如何因小鼠的情况而异;以及公制距离与小鼠的体积、表面积、长度和身体状况的关系。大变形微分同构度量映射算法是我们用来获得树突棘相对于模板棘的二值图像形态计量量化的度量距离的工具。我们证明,对于未调整尺度的值,度量距离和其他形态测量在条件之间显着不同。形态计量测量(而不是小鼠条件)几乎解释了公制距离的所有变化。由于大小(或尺度)在变化中占主导地位,我们调整公制距离和其他形态测量尺度。我们证明了尺度度量距离和其他尺度形态度量变量在条件下仍然是不同的,并且尺度度量距离最显著地依赖于尺度形态度量。所使用的方法也适用于其他器官或组织的形态计量测量和LDDMM以外的度量距离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Type-Specific Analysis of Morphometry of Dendrite Spines of Mice
In this article, we analyze the morphometric measures of dendrite spines of mice derived from electron tomography images for different spine types based on pre-assigned categories. The morphometric measures we consider include the metric distance, volume, surface area, and length of dendrite spines of mice. The question of interest is how these morphometric measures differ by condition of mice; and how the metric distance relates to volume, surface area, length, and condition of mice. The large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping algorithm is the tool we use to obtain the metric distances that quantize the morphometry of binary images of dendrite spines with respect to a template spine. We demonstrate that for the values not adjusted for scale metric distances and other morphometric measures are significantly different between the conditions. The morphometric measures (rather than the mice condition) explain almost all the variation in metric distances. Since size (or scale) dominates the other variables in variation, we adjust metric distances and other morphometric measures for scale. We demonstrate that the scaled metric distances and other scaled morphometric variables still differ for condition, and scaled metric distances depend most significantly on scaled morphometric measures. The methodology used is also valid for morphometric measures of other organs or tissues and metric distances other than LDDMM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信