基于语料库的中国英语学习者书面输出中的虽错分析

Jingwen Chen
{"title":"基于语料库的中国英语学习者书面输出中的虽错分析","authors":"Jingwen Chen","doi":"10.22158/SELT.V5N3P429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subordinating conjunction although is frequently used in English and is considered easy for students to master by many Chinese English teachers. However, errors are often found in Chinese EFL learners although output during pedagogical practice. This paper aims to explore and analyze common errors of although in Chinese EFL learners writing. The study is a corpus-based analysis launched under the computer-aided error analysis framework which is a new practice developed from the error analysis hypothesis. Errors of although found in texts from the Chinese Learner English Corpus (CLEC) are extracted and analyzed. Qualitative and quantitative analyses are conducted in the study. According to the findings, there are four major types of although errors found in Chinese EFL learners writing but/yet addition, punctuation errors, although misuse, and omissions and blends. Factors such as interlingual difference between English and Mandarin Chinese, intralingual interference within the English language system, pedagogical neglect in English classrooms and different cognitive styles are potential causes of Chinese EFL learners although errors.","PeriodicalId":112359,"journal":{"name":"Studies in English Language and Teaching","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Corpus-Based Analysis of although Errors in Chinese EFL Learners’ Written Output\",\"authors\":\"Jingwen Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.22158/SELT.V5N3P429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The subordinating conjunction although is frequently used in English and is considered easy for students to master by many Chinese English teachers. However, errors are often found in Chinese EFL learners although output during pedagogical practice. This paper aims to explore and analyze common errors of although in Chinese EFL learners writing. The study is a corpus-based analysis launched under the computer-aided error analysis framework which is a new practice developed from the error analysis hypothesis. Errors of although found in texts from the Chinese Learner English Corpus (CLEC) are extracted and analyzed. Qualitative and quantitative analyses are conducted in the study. According to the findings, there are four major types of although errors found in Chinese EFL learners writing but/yet addition, punctuation errors, although misuse, and omissions and blends. Factors such as interlingual difference between English and Mandarin Chinese, intralingual interference within the English language system, pedagogical neglect in English classrooms and different cognitive styles are potential causes of Chinese EFL learners although errors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in English Language and Teaching\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in English Language and Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22158/SELT.V5N3P429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in English Language and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/SELT.V5N3P429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

从属连词虽然在英语中经常使用,但许多中国英语教师认为学生很容易掌握。然而,在教学实践中,中国的英语学习者虽然有输出,但也经常出现错误。本文旨在探讨和分析中国英语学习者写作中常见的“虽然”错误。本研究是在计算机辅助误差分析框架下展开的基于语料库的分析,是在误差分析假说的基础上发展起来的一种新的实践。对《中国学习英语语料库》文本中出现的“虽然”错误进行了提取和分析。在研究中进行了定性和定量分析。根据研究结果,中国英语学习者在写作中出现的“虽然”错误主要有四种类型:加法错误、标点错误、“虽然”误用、省略和混合。英语和普通话的语际差异、英语语言系统内的语内干扰、英语课堂上的教学忽视以及不同的认知风格等因素都是中国英语学习者产生错误的潜在原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Corpus-Based Analysis of although Errors in Chinese EFL Learners’ Written Output
The subordinating conjunction although is frequently used in English and is considered easy for students to master by many Chinese English teachers. However, errors are often found in Chinese EFL learners although output during pedagogical practice. This paper aims to explore and analyze common errors of although in Chinese EFL learners writing. The study is a corpus-based analysis launched under the computer-aided error analysis framework which is a new practice developed from the error analysis hypothesis. Errors of although found in texts from the Chinese Learner English Corpus (CLEC) are extracted and analyzed. Qualitative and quantitative analyses are conducted in the study. According to the findings, there are four major types of although errors found in Chinese EFL learners writing but/yet addition, punctuation errors, although misuse, and omissions and blends. Factors such as interlingual difference between English and Mandarin Chinese, intralingual interference within the English language system, pedagogical neglect in English classrooms and different cognitive styles are potential causes of Chinese EFL learners although errors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信