金融改革对台湾银行业竞争与消费者福利之影响

Ching-I Huang, Ching-Hsiang Chuang
{"title":"金融改革对台湾银行业竞争与消费者福利之影响","authors":"Ching-I Huang, Ching-Hsiang Chuang","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1997814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the effects of the two waves of financial reforms implemented between 2002 and 2008 in the Taiwan banking industry. The first financial reform aimed to raise capital adequacy ratio and reduced non-performing loans. The second financial reform encouraged banks to merge. We investigate the impacts of the reforms on market competition and consumers’ welfare. Using a structural model for saving and borrowing demand in a differentiated market, we find that a bank’s capital adequacy rate has a positive impact on the utility of both savers and borrowers. Contrarily, the ratio of non-performing loans has no significant effect. During these reforms, market competition tended to decline while consumers’ welfare also dropped for both savers and borrowers. Nonetheless, when we use counterfactual experiments to isolate the direct effect of reform policies from other factors, we find the first reform actually had little effect on market competition while raised both savers’ and borrowers’ welfare. On the other hand, the second reform reduced market competition, increased savers’ welfare, but decrease borrowers’ welfare.","PeriodicalId":135286,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Regulation of Financial Markets (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impacts of Financial Reforms on Competition and Consumer Welfare in the Taiwan Banking Industry\",\"authors\":\"Ching-I Huang, Ching-Hsiang Chuang\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1997814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyzes the effects of the two waves of financial reforms implemented between 2002 and 2008 in the Taiwan banking industry. The first financial reform aimed to raise capital adequacy ratio and reduced non-performing loans. The second financial reform encouraged banks to merge. We investigate the impacts of the reforms on market competition and consumers’ welfare. Using a structural model for saving and borrowing demand in a differentiated market, we find that a bank’s capital adequacy rate has a positive impact on the utility of both savers and borrowers. Contrarily, the ratio of non-performing loans has no significant effect. During these reforms, market competition tended to decline while consumers’ welfare also dropped for both savers and borrowers. Nonetheless, when we use counterfactual experiments to isolate the direct effect of reform policies from other factors, we find the first reform actually had little effect on market competition while raised both savers’ and borrowers’ welfare. On the other hand, the second reform reduced market competition, increased savers’ welfare, but decrease borrowers’ welfare.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Regulation of Financial Markets (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Regulation of Financial Markets (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1997814\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Regulation of Financial Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1997814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了2002年至2008年两波金融改革对台湾银行业的影响。第一次金融改革旨在提高资本充足率,减少不良贷款。第二次金融改革鼓励银行合并。我们研究了改革对市场竞争和消费者福利的影响。利用差异化市场中储蓄和借贷需求的结构模型,我们发现银行的资本充足率对存款人和借款人的效用都有积极的影响。相反,不良贷款率没有显著影响。在这些改革中,市场竞争趋于减弱,同时消费者的福利也在下降,无论是对储蓄者还是借款人。然而,当我们使用反事实实验将改革政策的直接影响从其他因素中分离出来时,我们发现第一次改革实际上对市场竞争的影响很小,但同时提高了储蓄者和借款人的福利。另一方面,二次改革减少了市场竞争,增加了储户的福利,但降低了借款人的福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impacts of Financial Reforms on Competition and Consumer Welfare in the Taiwan Banking Industry
This paper analyzes the effects of the two waves of financial reforms implemented between 2002 and 2008 in the Taiwan banking industry. The first financial reform aimed to raise capital adequacy ratio and reduced non-performing loans. The second financial reform encouraged banks to merge. We investigate the impacts of the reforms on market competition and consumers’ welfare. Using a structural model for saving and borrowing demand in a differentiated market, we find that a bank’s capital adequacy rate has a positive impact on the utility of both savers and borrowers. Contrarily, the ratio of non-performing loans has no significant effect. During these reforms, market competition tended to decline while consumers’ welfare also dropped for both savers and borrowers. Nonetheless, when we use counterfactual experiments to isolate the direct effect of reform policies from other factors, we find the first reform actually had little effect on market competition while raised both savers’ and borrowers’ welfare. On the other hand, the second reform reduced market competition, increased savers’ welfare, but decrease borrowers’ welfare.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信