世界银行对巴西教育公共政策的建议

E. Nez, B. Borssoi
{"title":"世界银行对巴西教育公共政策的建议","authors":"E. Nez, B. Borssoi","doi":"10.29327/210932.8.1-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“mercado” a palavra hoje pudicamente a proprie-dade privada dos meios de produção; a posse de ativos patrimoniais que comandam a apropriação sobre uma grande escala de riquezas criadas por outrem; economia ex-plicitamente orientada para os objetivos únicos de rentabilidade e de competitividade e nas quais somente as demandas monetárias solventes são reconhecidas. As fusões-aqui-sições dos últimos anos empurraram o processo de concentração a níveis que pareciam impossíveis até vinte anos atrás. Atrás do eufemismo do “mercado”, encontram-se for-mas cada vez mais concentradas de capital industrial e financeiro que detêm um poder econômico sempre maior, que inclui uma capacidade muito forte de “colocar em xeque o mercado”, “curto-circuitar” e cercar os mecanismos da troca “normal” (p. 7 – grifos do autor). ABSTRACT: Historically, higher education reforms in Latin America have been influenced by the World Bank, which follows hegemonic thinking, in addition to the diagnosis made by international organizations. Education is considered by these agencies as the driving force behind economic development and the fight against inequality. However, betting on education alone will not solve the social problem. This text aims to understand the current pro-posals of the World Bank that are present in the construction of public educational policies in developing countries like Brazil. Based on the qualitative approach, this text was constructed through bibliographic and documentary research. Preliminary analyzes of the documents signal that the BM is called upon to take a clear role in organizing the economy. Its action is becoming politicized, comprehensive and intrusive. There is much to be researched and analyzed about their practices and the impact on the restructuring of Brazilian social policies.","PeriodicalId":285093,"journal":{"name":"Muiraquitã - Revista de Letras e Humanidades","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RECOMENDAÇÕES DO BANCO MUNDIAL (BM) PARA AS POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS EDUCACIONAIS BRASILEIRAS\",\"authors\":\"E. Nez, B. Borssoi\",\"doi\":\"10.29327/210932.8.1-16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“mercado” a palavra hoje pudicamente a proprie-dade privada dos meios de produção; a posse de ativos patrimoniais que comandam a apropriação sobre uma grande escala de riquezas criadas por outrem; economia ex-plicitamente orientada para os objetivos únicos de rentabilidade e de competitividade e nas quais somente as demandas monetárias solventes são reconhecidas. As fusões-aqui-sições dos últimos anos empurraram o processo de concentração a níveis que pareciam impossíveis até vinte anos atrás. Atrás do eufemismo do “mercado”, encontram-se for-mas cada vez mais concentradas de capital industrial e financeiro que detêm um poder econômico sempre maior, que inclui uma capacidade muito forte de “colocar em xeque o mercado”, “curto-circuitar” e cercar os mecanismos da troca “normal” (p. 7 – grifos do autor). ABSTRACT: Historically, higher education reforms in Latin America have been influenced by the World Bank, which follows hegemonic thinking, in addition to the diagnosis made by international organizations. Education is considered by these agencies as the driving force behind economic development and the fight against inequality. However, betting on education alone will not solve the social problem. This text aims to understand the current pro-posals of the World Bank that are present in the construction of public educational policies in developing countries like Brazil. Based on the qualitative approach, this text was constructed through bibliographic and documentary research. Preliminary analyzes of the documents signal that the BM is called upon to take a clear role in organizing the economy. Its action is becoming politicized, comprehensive and intrusive. There is much to be researched and analyzed about their practices and the impact on the restructuring of Brazilian social policies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Muiraquitã - Revista de Letras e Humanidades\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Muiraquitã - Revista de Letras e Humanidades\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29327/210932.8.1-16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muiraquitã - Revista de Letras e Humanidades","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29327/210932.8.1-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“市场”这个词现在谨慎地指的是生产资料的私有制;拥有支配他人创造的大量财富的财产;一种明确地以盈利和竞争力为唯一目标,只承认有偿付能力的货币需求的经济。近年来的合并将合并过程推到了20年前似乎不可能的水平。委婉语背后的“市场”,都是-越来越集中的工业资本和金融所持更大的经济实力总是包括一个能力非常强的“给你”,“市场短期-circuitar”包围的交易机制,“正常的”(p . 7—狮鹫的观点)。摘要:从历史上看,拉丁美洲的高等教育改革受到世界银行的影响,世界银行遵循霸权思维,除了国际组织的诊断之外。这些机构认为教育是经济发展和消除不平等的推动力量。然而,单靠教育并不能解决社会问题。本文旨在了解目前世界银行在巴西等发展中国家制定公共教育政策方面的立场。本文以定性研究方法为基础,通过文献和纪录片研究构建。对文件的初步分析表明,世界银行被要求在组织经济方面发挥明确的作用。它的行动变得政治化、全面和侵入性。关于它们的做法及其对巴西社会政策改革的影响,还有许多研究和分析工作要做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RECOMENDAÇÕES DO BANCO MUNDIAL (BM) PARA AS POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS EDUCACIONAIS BRASILEIRAS
“mercado” a palavra hoje pudicamente a proprie-dade privada dos meios de produção; a posse de ativos patrimoniais que comandam a apropriação sobre uma grande escala de riquezas criadas por outrem; economia ex-plicitamente orientada para os objetivos únicos de rentabilidade e de competitividade e nas quais somente as demandas monetárias solventes são reconhecidas. As fusões-aqui-sições dos últimos anos empurraram o processo de concentração a níveis que pareciam impossíveis até vinte anos atrás. Atrás do eufemismo do “mercado”, encontram-se for-mas cada vez mais concentradas de capital industrial e financeiro que detêm um poder econômico sempre maior, que inclui uma capacidade muito forte de “colocar em xeque o mercado”, “curto-circuitar” e cercar os mecanismos da troca “normal” (p. 7 – grifos do autor). ABSTRACT: Historically, higher education reforms in Latin America have been influenced by the World Bank, which follows hegemonic thinking, in addition to the diagnosis made by international organizations. Education is considered by these agencies as the driving force behind economic development and the fight against inequality. However, betting on education alone will not solve the social problem. This text aims to understand the current pro-posals of the World Bank that are present in the construction of public educational policies in developing countries like Brazil. Based on the qualitative approach, this text was constructed through bibliographic and documentary research. Preliminary analyzes of the documents signal that the BM is called upon to take a clear role in organizing the economy. Its action is becoming politicized, comprehensive and intrusive. There is much to be researched and analyzed about their practices and the impact on the restructuring of Brazilian social policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信