司法房地产拍卖制度修正的实证分析:与一般房地产交易的比较

Y. Ooka
{"title":"司法房地产拍卖制度修正的实证分析:与一般房地产交易的比较","authors":"Y. Ooka","doi":"10.5736/jares.31.4_119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper shows the effect of a series of system revisions of judicial real estate auction in the 2000s on three factors: bid acceptance ratio, number of bidders, and highest bid. Using multiyear data of auctions from multiple district courts, I estimate the improvement of the three factors by the revision.Furthermore, comparing real estate auction data with voluntary sale and general real estate trading data, I find that the selling price in auction was greatly lower than the price in voluntary sale even after the system revisions. Based on the empirical results, I suggest about necessity of further system revisions.","PeriodicalId":394495,"journal":{"name":"New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical Analysis on the System Revisions of Judicial Real Estate Auctions: Comparison with General Real Estate Trading\",\"authors\":\"Y. Ooka\",\"doi\":\"10.5736/jares.31.4_119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper shows the effect of a series of system revisions of judicial real estate auction in the 2000s on three factors: bid acceptance ratio, number of bidders, and highest bid. Using multiyear data of auctions from multiple district courts, I estimate the improvement of the three factors by the revision.Furthermore, comparing real estate auction data with voluntary sale and general real estate trading data, I find that the selling price in auction was greatly lower than the price in voluntary sale even after the system revisions. Based on the empirical results, I suggest about necessity of further system revisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5736/jares.31.4_119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5736/jares.31.4_119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了2000年代以来一系列司法房地产拍卖制度的修改对中标率、投标人数量和最高出价三个因素的影响。使用来自多个地区法院的多年拍卖数据,我估计修订后这三个因素的改善。此外,将房地产拍卖数据与自愿出售和一般房地产交易数据进行比较,我发现即使在制度修订后,拍卖中的销售价格也大大低于自愿出售的价格。在实证结果的基础上,提出了进一步制度修正的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empirical Analysis on the System Revisions of Judicial Real Estate Auctions: Comparison with General Real Estate Trading
This paper shows the effect of a series of system revisions of judicial real estate auction in the 2000s on three factors: bid acceptance ratio, number of bidders, and highest bid. Using multiyear data of auctions from multiple district courts, I estimate the improvement of the three factors by the revision.Furthermore, comparing real estate auction data with voluntary sale and general real estate trading data, I find that the selling price in auction was greatly lower than the price in voluntary sale even after the system revisions. Based on the empirical results, I suggest about necessity of further system revisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信