对校园紧急事件的反应:文本挖掘分析

Calandra Lindstadt, Elizabeth M. Glowacki, Brett W. Robertson, Gary B. Wilcox, J. Bernhardt
{"title":"对校园紧急事件的反应:文本挖掘分析","authors":"Calandra Lindstadt, Elizabeth M. Glowacki, Brett W. Robertson, Gary B. Wilcox, J. Bernhardt","doi":"10.1080/17459435.2020.1755719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To observe students’ reactions to an emergency and how they use social media to communicate about it shortly after, this content analysis examines social media posts directly after a deadly stabbing that took place on The University of Texas at Austin campus in the Spring of 2017. A text-mining approach was used to analyze a total of 17,216 tweets and retweets posted within 48-hours after the attack. Approximately half of the tweets were news reports of the event, the remainder depicted unique reactions to the circumstances surrounding the stabbing. The most recurring topics to emerge were status updates on the situation, expressions of distrust for the mainstream media, theories about the motivation behind the attack, and inflammatory rumors of additional violent incidents nearby campus. The most influential Twitter profiles were operated by mainstream news outlets and included no official city or campus accounts. Now that individuals can access information online before officials even formulate a response, monitoring and leveraging social media sites like Twitter before and during an emergency can help identify and reduce the spread of misinformation. As social and mobile media continue to penetrate college campuses, we must examine how the dissemination of information shapes fact and fiction.","PeriodicalId":406864,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reactions to a campus emergency: A text-mining analysis\",\"authors\":\"Calandra Lindstadt, Elizabeth M. Glowacki, Brett W. Robertson, Gary B. Wilcox, J. Bernhardt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17459435.2020.1755719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To observe students’ reactions to an emergency and how they use social media to communicate about it shortly after, this content analysis examines social media posts directly after a deadly stabbing that took place on The University of Texas at Austin campus in the Spring of 2017. A text-mining approach was used to analyze a total of 17,216 tweets and retweets posted within 48-hours after the attack. Approximately half of the tweets were news reports of the event, the remainder depicted unique reactions to the circumstances surrounding the stabbing. The most recurring topics to emerge were status updates on the situation, expressions of distrust for the mainstream media, theories about the motivation behind the attack, and inflammatory rumors of additional violent incidents nearby campus. The most influential Twitter profiles were operated by mainstream news outlets and included no official city or campus accounts. Now that individuals can access information online before officials even formulate a response, monitoring and leveraging social media sites like Twitter before and during an emergency can help identify and reduce the spread of misinformation. As social and mobile media continue to penetrate college campuses, we must examine how the dissemination of information shapes fact and fiction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2020.1755719\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2020.1755719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

为了观察学生对紧急情况的反应,以及他们在紧急情况发生后不久如何使用社交媒体进行沟通,本内容分析调查了2017年春季德克萨斯大学奥斯汀校区发生致命刺伤事件后直接发布的社交媒体帖子。一种文本挖掘方法被用来分析攻击后48小时内发布的17,216条推文和转发。大约一半的推文是对事件的新闻报道,其余的描述了对刺杀事件的独特反应。最常出现的话题是对形势的更新,对主流媒体的不信任,对袭击背后动机的理论,以及校园附近发生其他暴力事件的煽动性谣言。最具影响力的推特账号由主流新闻媒体运营,不包括官方城市或校园账号。现在,个人甚至可以在官员制定应对措施之前就在网上获取信息,在紧急情况发生之前和发生期间监测和利用Twitter等社交媒体网站,可以帮助识别和减少错误信息的传播。随着社交媒体和移动媒体不断渗透大学校园,我们必须审视信息的传播是如何塑造事实和虚构的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reactions to a campus emergency: A text-mining analysis
To observe students’ reactions to an emergency and how they use social media to communicate about it shortly after, this content analysis examines social media posts directly after a deadly stabbing that took place on The University of Texas at Austin campus in the Spring of 2017. A text-mining approach was used to analyze a total of 17,216 tweets and retweets posted within 48-hours after the attack. Approximately half of the tweets were news reports of the event, the remainder depicted unique reactions to the circumstances surrounding the stabbing. The most recurring topics to emerge were status updates on the situation, expressions of distrust for the mainstream media, theories about the motivation behind the attack, and inflammatory rumors of additional violent incidents nearby campus. The most influential Twitter profiles were operated by mainstream news outlets and included no official city or campus accounts. Now that individuals can access information online before officials even formulate a response, monitoring and leveraging social media sites like Twitter before and during an emergency can help identify and reduce the spread of misinformation. As social and mobile media continue to penetrate college campuses, we must examine how the dissemination of information shapes fact and fiction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信