{"title":"两种不同农杆菌双组分系统的信号串扰","authors":"Minliang Guo, Yujuan Xu, Dawei Gao, Nan Xu","doi":"10.11159/ICBB19.110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extended Abstract Bacteria often use the so-called two-component system to transduce signal. A typical bacterial two-component system is comparatively simple and comprises two components, a sensor with histidine kinase activity and its cognate phosphorylatable response regulator [1, 2]. Most bacteria encode dozens of two-component signaling pathway [2]. Although both the histidine kinase sensor and response regulator in each two-component system are part of large, paralogous protein families that are highly similar at both sequence and structural levels, relatively little interaction between histidine kinase sensor and non-cognate response regulator was found, indicating that individual two-component signal transduction systems are highly specific, well insulated and rare cross-talk [3]. The high specificity of interaction between sensor and its cognate response regulator is accordant with the requirement for maintaining the faithful flow of signal through two-component system. Agrobacterium uses chemotaxis system to sense a large number of chemicals released by wounded host and VirA/VirG two-component system to induce the virulence gene expression [4, 5]. Chemotaxis signal transduction system is a special case of two-component system. Its histidine kinase CheA lacks transmembrane sensor domain and has three cognate response regulators, CheY1, CheY2 and CheB. Although the atypical two-component system, chemotaxis system is very different from the typical VirA/VirG two-component system, both of them are showed to be involved in Agrobacterium tumorigenesis [6]. Our previous study suggested that chemotaxis signaling and virulence induction signaling may have crosstalk in Agrobacterium [3]. Here, three lines of experimental evidences demonstrate the signaling cross-talk between these two two-component systems. 1) Chemotaxis signal-driving run pattern of Agrobacterium cheA-deletion mutant could be adjusted by the complementation of VirA. 2) Bacterial two hybrid assay showed that VirA interacts with CheY2 and CheA interacts with VirG. 3) In vitro pull-down experiment showed that VirA can pull-down CheY2.","PeriodicalId":265434,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on New Technologies","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Signal Crosstalk between Two Different Agrobacterium Two-Component Systems\",\"authors\":\"Minliang Guo, Yujuan Xu, Dawei Gao, Nan Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.11159/ICBB19.110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Extended Abstract Bacteria often use the so-called two-component system to transduce signal. A typical bacterial two-component system is comparatively simple and comprises two components, a sensor with histidine kinase activity and its cognate phosphorylatable response regulator [1, 2]. Most bacteria encode dozens of two-component signaling pathway [2]. Although both the histidine kinase sensor and response regulator in each two-component system are part of large, paralogous protein families that are highly similar at both sequence and structural levels, relatively little interaction between histidine kinase sensor and non-cognate response regulator was found, indicating that individual two-component signal transduction systems are highly specific, well insulated and rare cross-talk [3]. The high specificity of interaction between sensor and its cognate response regulator is accordant with the requirement for maintaining the faithful flow of signal through two-component system. Agrobacterium uses chemotaxis system to sense a large number of chemicals released by wounded host and VirA/VirG two-component system to induce the virulence gene expression [4, 5]. Chemotaxis signal transduction system is a special case of two-component system. Its histidine kinase CheA lacks transmembrane sensor domain and has three cognate response regulators, CheY1, CheY2 and CheB. Although the atypical two-component system, chemotaxis system is very different from the typical VirA/VirG two-component system, both of them are showed to be involved in Agrobacterium tumorigenesis [6]. Our previous study suggested that chemotaxis signaling and virulence induction signaling may have crosstalk in Agrobacterium [3]. Here, three lines of experimental evidences demonstrate the signaling cross-talk between these two two-component systems. 1) Chemotaxis signal-driving run pattern of Agrobacterium cheA-deletion mutant could be adjusted by the complementation of VirA. 2) Bacterial two hybrid assay showed that VirA interacts with CheY2 and CheA interacts with VirG. 3) In vitro pull-down experiment showed that VirA can pull-down CheY2.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on New Technologies\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on New Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11159/ICBB19.110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on New Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11159/ICBB19.110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Signal Crosstalk between Two Different Agrobacterium Two-Component Systems
Extended Abstract Bacteria often use the so-called two-component system to transduce signal. A typical bacterial two-component system is comparatively simple and comprises two components, a sensor with histidine kinase activity and its cognate phosphorylatable response regulator [1, 2]. Most bacteria encode dozens of two-component signaling pathway [2]. Although both the histidine kinase sensor and response regulator in each two-component system are part of large, paralogous protein families that are highly similar at both sequence and structural levels, relatively little interaction between histidine kinase sensor and non-cognate response regulator was found, indicating that individual two-component signal transduction systems are highly specific, well insulated and rare cross-talk [3]. The high specificity of interaction between sensor and its cognate response regulator is accordant with the requirement for maintaining the faithful flow of signal through two-component system. Agrobacterium uses chemotaxis system to sense a large number of chemicals released by wounded host and VirA/VirG two-component system to induce the virulence gene expression [4, 5]. Chemotaxis signal transduction system is a special case of two-component system. Its histidine kinase CheA lacks transmembrane sensor domain and has three cognate response regulators, CheY1, CheY2 and CheB. Although the atypical two-component system, chemotaxis system is very different from the typical VirA/VirG two-component system, both of them are showed to be involved in Agrobacterium tumorigenesis [6]. Our previous study suggested that chemotaxis signaling and virulence induction signaling may have crosstalk in Agrobacterium [3]. Here, three lines of experimental evidences demonstrate the signaling cross-talk between these two two-component systems. 1) Chemotaxis signal-driving run pattern of Agrobacterium cheA-deletion mutant could be adjusted by the complementation of VirA. 2) Bacterial two hybrid assay showed that VirA interacts with CheY2 and CheA interacts with VirG. 3) In vitro pull-down experiment showed that VirA can pull-down CheY2.