国家援助与欧盟公共采购:更多的互动,更模糊的边界

A. Sanchez-Graells
{"title":"国家援助与欧盟公共采购:更多的互动,更模糊的边界","authors":"A. Sanchez-Graells","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3466288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter revisits the interaction between the EU rules on State aid and on public procurement. It probes the standard presumption that compliance with EU procurement rules excludes the existence of State aid because public tenders are apt to replicate market conditions and thus suppress any undue economic advantage. The chapter assesses the increasing number of points of interaction between both sets of rules that emerge from the novelties in the 2014 EU Public Procurement Package and the constant evolution of case law; and highlights some shortcomings of the standard presumption in relation to: the notion of State aid; RD ‘public house’ situations; negotiated procurement; abnormally low tenders; the procurement of services of general economic interest (SGEI); procurement itself as an SGEI; and procurement from ‘special organisations’. The chapter concludes that the boundaries of what constitutes State aid in the context of public procurement are fuzzier than ever. In doing so, the chapter offers a road-map for further research in this area of EU economic law, as well as identifying areas that could benefit from additional guidance from the European Commission, in particular on bench-marking.","PeriodicalId":132443,"journal":{"name":"European Economics: Political Economy & Public Economics eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State Aid and EU Public Procurement: More Interactions, Fuzzier Boundaries\",\"authors\":\"A. Sanchez-Graells\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3466288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter revisits the interaction between the EU rules on State aid and on public procurement. It probes the standard presumption that compliance with EU procurement rules excludes the existence of State aid because public tenders are apt to replicate market conditions and thus suppress any undue economic advantage. The chapter assesses the increasing number of points of interaction between both sets of rules that emerge from the novelties in the 2014 EU Public Procurement Package and the constant evolution of case law; and highlights some shortcomings of the standard presumption in relation to: the notion of State aid; RD ‘public house’ situations; negotiated procurement; abnormally low tenders; the procurement of services of general economic interest (SGEI); procurement itself as an SGEI; and procurement from ‘special organisations’. The chapter concludes that the boundaries of what constitutes State aid in the context of public procurement are fuzzier than ever. In doing so, the chapter offers a road-map for further research in this area of EU economic law, as well as identifying areas that could benefit from additional guidance from the European Commission, in particular on bench-marking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Economics: Political Economy & Public Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Economics: Political Economy & Public Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3466288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economics: Political Economy & Public Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3466288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本章回顾了欧盟国家援助规则和公共采购规则之间的相互作用。它探讨了标准假设,即遵守欧盟采购规则排除了国家援助的存在,因为公开招标容易复制市场条件,从而抑制了任何不适当的经济优势。本章评估了两套规则之间越来越多的互动点,这些规则来自2014年欧盟公共采购一揽子计划的新颖性和判例法的不断演变;并强调了标准推定在以下方面的一些缺陷:国家援助的概念;RD“酒馆”情况;谈判采购;异常低的投标;采购具有一般经济利益的服务;作为SGEI的采购本身;从“特殊组织”采购。本章的结论是,在公共采购方面,构成国家援助的界限比以往任何时候都更加模糊。在此过程中,本章为欧盟经济法这一领域的进一步研究提供了路线图,并确定了可以从欧盟委员会的额外指导中受益的领域,特别是在基准方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
State Aid and EU Public Procurement: More Interactions, Fuzzier Boundaries
This chapter revisits the interaction between the EU rules on State aid and on public procurement. It probes the standard presumption that compliance with EU procurement rules excludes the existence of State aid because public tenders are apt to replicate market conditions and thus suppress any undue economic advantage. The chapter assesses the increasing number of points of interaction between both sets of rules that emerge from the novelties in the 2014 EU Public Procurement Package and the constant evolution of case law; and highlights some shortcomings of the standard presumption in relation to: the notion of State aid; RD ‘public house’ situations; negotiated procurement; abnormally low tenders; the procurement of services of general economic interest (SGEI); procurement itself as an SGEI; and procurement from ‘special organisations’. The chapter concludes that the boundaries of what constitutes State aid in the context of public procurement are fuzzier than ever. In doing so, the chapter offers a road-map for further research in this area of EU economic law, as well as identifying areas that could benefit from additional guidance from the European Commission, in particular on bench-marking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信